Search

Published After
Published Before

Search Results

  • „Ratio Generationis” – Aspects for responsible generational research
    104-126
    Views:
    94

    Huge amount of literature has been published in recent years on topic of generation research
    but of varying quality. There is a significant interest in the topic, although an increasing amount
    of contradictory and methodologically questionable results have come to light. People develop
    prejudices and beliefs based on popular media, which could be counterbalanced by scientific
    works, but there is a noticable amount of thorough criticism against them. It is still a question,
    whether generation is the proper response to certain phenomena or we have just „generated” it
    and most charachteristics are rather related to age or life span? Cautious research is complicated
    and lengthy, therefore many either choose to perform superficial research or to go so in-depth
    that does not allow answering problems and return to just individual differences. Some conclude
    by refusing the generational approach altogether. In these circumstances a kind of „responsible”
    generational research is to be suggested, which turns from dead ends to the scientific way and
    finally tries to find „ration in generations” keeping in mind all the criticism of the approach.
    I summerize cosiderations in my work to find this right direction.

  • Factors that influence matechoice among college women
    136-158
    Views:
    70

    The centre of the study is the influential factors of female students in higher education. As a
    research question, does the institution of marriage continue to be a prominent place among
    female students in higher education as a planned relationship? And, does a person with
    a higher education level of education develop a relationship with a higher educated person,
    therefore achieving homogeneity of relationship? Thereby the choice of coupling is presented in
    addition to the examination of marriage, cohabitation and postponement mechanism, beyond
    the factors influencing partner selection, which are analyzed in a qualitative research of tenpersons. Factors include age, place of residence, origin and religion, separation from parenting,
    educational attainment, material capital and labor market situation, planned duration of the
    relationship and effects of the information age.

  • Community resilience and social support relationships – An analytical approach and research results based on long-term series analysis of communities affected by the red sludge disaster
    6-31
    Views:
    67

    vOne of the most serious consequences of disasters is the disruption or even the loss of social
    support relationships. Hence, this paper analyses the social support relationships in the
    framework of community resilience based on face-to-face interviews with direct (180 people)
    and indirect (180 people) victims of the red sludge disaster, using data for 2013 and 2020.
    (Hungary, Devecser district).
    The focus was analysed according to four types of social support relationship: reciprocal,
    donor to recipient and incomplete/disintegrated. At the time of the disaster, we identified a high
    level of support activity and a strong reciprocal-donor type of aid model. In contrast, in 2013, we
    found an incomplete/disintegrated - reciprocal model with low support activity, and in 2020, a
    reciprocal- incomplete/disintegrated model with medium activity.
    Based on a detailed statistical analysis of different social support types among the red
    sludge disaster’s victims the paper explores and presents the social support activities and
    their various patterns with respect to their roles in the resilience of communities. The different
    patterns of social supports relationships that emerged in each period examined varied widely,
    though – with different intensity – they were primarily influenced by the fact how people were
    affected by disaster’s damages (directly and indirectly). Nevertheless, by 2020, other factors,
    such as residence, age, and economic activity had already an equally strong impact on different
    types of social support relationships as the affectedness by the disaster of 2010. We found that
    communities responded to the red sludge disaster in 2010 and to the Covid-19 epidemic in 2020
    in a reactive way by activating their social support relationship.