Search
Search Results
-
Error analysis in teaching combinatorics: the development of prospective teachers’ confidence and problem-solving skills
103-125Views:0This study investigates the pedagogical potential of error analysis in the teaching of combinatorics within mathematics teacher education. Building on previous research that highlights the role of incorrectly worked sample solutions in cognitive, metacognitive, and affective learning processes, we conducted a mixed-methods study with prospective mathematics teachers at Eötvös Loránd University. Quantitative results from Likert-scale questionnaires (n = 26) indicate that regular analysis of incorrectly worked solutions substantially enhanced participants’ self-confidence, strengthened their problem-solving skills, and positively shaped their attitudes toward future teaching practice. Complementary qualitative data, analyzed through grounded theory, revealed five interrelated categories – self-reflection and confidence, discernment, deeper understanding, methodological surplus, and combinatorial surplus – that together explain the mechanisms through which error analysis supports professional growth. The findings suggest that systematic analysis of conceptual errors not only improves problem-solving competence but also fosters self-confidence, self-reflection, and teaching-related attitudes. By comparing our emergent model of error-analysis thinking with Schoenfeld’s problem-solving framework, we argue that “discernment” constitutes a distinctive and central dimension of error-based learning. The study contributes both theoretically, by refining models of mathematical problem solving, and practically, by offering concrete recommendations for integrating error analysis into mathematics teacher education curricula.
Subject Classification: 97C30, 97K20, 97D40, 97C70, 97C99
-
Mathematics teachers' reasons to use (or not) intentional errors
263-282Views:332Mathematics teachers can make use of both spontaneously arising and intentionally planted errors. Open questions about both types of errors were answered by 23 Finnish middle-school teachers. Their reasons to use or not to use errors were analyzed qualitatively. Seven categories were found: Activation and discussion, Analyzing skills, Correcting misconceptions, Learning to live with errors, (Mis)remembering errors, (Mis)understanding error and Time. Compared to earlier results, the teachers placed substantially less emphasis on affective issues, whereas the answers yielded new distinctions in cognitive dimensions. In particular, teachers' inclination to see errors as distractions could be divided into two aspects: students misunderstanding an error in the first place or student forgetting that an error was erroneous. Furthermore, the content analysis revealed generally positive beliefs towards using errors but some reservations about using intentional errors. Teachers viewed intentional errors mainly positively as possibilities for discussion, analysis and learning to live with mistakes. -
Transition from arithmetic to algebra in primary school education
225-248Views:266The main aim of this paper is to report a study that explores the thinking strategies and the most frequent errors of Hungarian grade 5-8 students in solving some problems involving arithmetical first-degree equations. The present study also aims at identifying the main arithmetical strategies attempted to solve a problem that can be solved algebraically. The analysis focuses on the shifts from arithmetic computations to algebraic thinking and procedures. Our second aim was to identify the main difficulties which students face when they have to deal with mathematical word problems. The errors made by students were categorized by stages in the problem solving process. The students' written works were analyzed seeking for patterns and regularities concerning both of the methods used by the students and the errors which occured in the problem solving process. In this paper, three prominent error types and their causes are discussed.
