Search

Search Results

• Comparative survey on pupils' beliefs of mathematics teaching in Finland and Ukraine

  13-33

  Erkki Pehkonen

  Sergey Rakov

  Views:

  6

  The focus of this comparative survey was the following research question: What are the differences and similarities in pupils' beliefs in mathematics between Finland and Ukraine? Data were gathered with the help of a questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 32 structured statements about mathematics teaching for which the pupils were asked to rate their beliefs on a 5-step scale. The Finnish sample comprised 255 pupils, and the Ukrainian sample 200 pupils. Our data has been gathered with a non-probabilistic convenience sampling.
  The main results of our survey are, as follows: Generally, pupils' beliefs of mathematics teaching and learning in Finland and Ukraine are rather far from similar. An investigation of the differences between pupils' answers across the two countries also showed beliefs that are characteristic for each country. For pupils in Finland, the characteristic beliefs seem to be, as follows: the value of strict discipline, working in small groups, and the idea that all understand. For pupils in Ukraine, the most characteristic might be the following beliefs: the use of learning games, the emphases of mathematical concepts, and teachers' explanations.

• Capturing how students' abilities and teaching experiences affect teachers' beliefs about mathematics teaching and learning

  195-212

  Safrudiannur

  Benjamin Rott

  Views:

  113

  We developed an instrument to investigate the effect of students' abilities and teaching experiences on teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning of mathematics. In this pilot study, we used the instrument to measure the beliefs of 43 Indonesian math teachers and five additional teachers. Then, for further investigation, we interviewed those five additional teachers. Results from the 43 teachers' responses to the instrument show that in contrast to teachers with less than five years of teaching, teachers with more than five years elicit significantly different beliefs about mathematics teaching and learning in different contexts related to students' abilities. Teachers' reports in the further investigation indicate that teaching experiences with high and low ability students in teaching mathematics could be a possible explanation of this contrast.

  Subject Classification: C20

• Problemorientierung im Mathematikunterricht – ein Gesichtspunkt der Qualitätssteigerung

  251-291

  Günter Graumann

  Erkki Pehkonen

  Views:

  2

  The aim of this article is to give a synopsis of problem orientation in mathematics education and to stimulate the discussion of the development and research about problem-orientated mathematics teaching. At the beginning we present historical viewpoints of problem orientation and their connection with recent theories of cognition (constructivism). Secondly we give characterizations of concepts that stand in the context of problem-orientation and discuss different forms of working with open problems in mathematics teaching. Arguments for more problem orientation in mathematics education will be discussed afterwards. Since experience shows that the implementation of open problems in classroom produces barriers, we then discuss mathematical beliefs and their role in mathematical learning and teaching. A list of literature at the end is not only for references but also can be used to further research.
  Zusammenfassung. Ziel des Beitrags ist es, eine Synopsis in Bezug auf Problemorientierung im Mathematikunterricht zu geben und die Diskussion bezüglich Entwicklung und Forschung eines problemorientierten Mathematikunterrichts zu stimulieren. Als Erstes werden historische Gesichtspunkte von Problemorientierung und deren Verkn üpfung mit neueren Erkenntnistheorien (Konstruktivismus) vorgestellt. Zweitens werden Erläuterungen zu Begriffen, die im Kontext von Problemorientierung stehen, gegeben und verschiedene Ausprägungen der Behandlung offener Probleme im Mathematikunterricht diskutiert. Argumente für eine stärkere Berücksichtigung von Problemorientierung im Mathematikunterricht werden danach erörtert. Auf Barrieren bei der Implementierung von offenen Problemen im Unterricht, die durch mathematische Beliefs (Vorstellungen, Überzeugungen) geprägt sind, wird zum Schluss eingegangen. Die abschließend aufgeführte Literaturliste dient nicht nur dem Beleg der Zitate, sondern kann auch zu weiterer Vertiefung genutzt werden.

• Mathematics teachers' reasons to use (or not) intentional errors

  263-282

  Riikka Palkki

  Peter Hästö

  Views:

  12

  Mathematics teachers can make use of both spontaneously arising and intentionally planted errors. Open questions about both types of errors were answered by 23 Finnish middle-school teachers. Their reasons to use or not to use errors were analyzed qualitatively. Seven categories were found: Activation and discussion, Analyzing skills, Correcting misconceptions, Learning to live with errors, (Mis)remembering errors, (Mis)understanding error and Time. Compared to earlier results, the teachers placed substantially less emphasis on affective issues, whereas the answers yielded new distinctions in cognitive dimensions. In particular, teachers' inclination to see errors as distractions could be divided into two aspects: students misunderstanding an error in the first place or student forgetting that an error was erroneous. Furthermore, the content analysis revealed generally positive beliefs towards using errors but some reservations about using intentional errors. Teachers viewed intentional errors mainly positively as possibilities for discussion, analysis and learning to live with mistakes.

• On two long lasting delusions in the history of equations

  147-158

  Lajos Klukovits

  Views:

  11

  Almost everybody was thought, that the 9th century Moshlem mathematician al-Khwarismi was the inventor of two powerful methods – called by him as al-jabr and al-muqabala – in solving quadratic equations. The second belief is that between Leonardo's Liber abaci and Luca Pacioli's Summa... happened nothing interesting in algebra. We will show that both beliefs are false by giving examples from the antiquity and analyzing Mediaeval Italian manuscripits.

• On the legacy of G. Pólya: some new (old) aspects of mathematical problem solving and relations to teaching

  169-189

  Bernd Zimmermann

  Views:

  12

  In this article are given some new aspects of mathematical problem solving. A framework is presented by three main resources: (1) Pólya's studies about mathematical heuristics are augmented by information drawn from a study of the history of mathematical problem solving. (2) Connections are presented between mathematical problem solving and mathematical beliefs. (3) Experience with a special program for mathematical talented students is sketched. On this background a new textbook-series has been developed and some teaching examples are taken from this context. An outlook is given on some new research on teaching of problem solving, including possible relations to modern brain research.

• Ist eine schnelle tiefgehende (und nachhaltige) Änderung in der Vorstellung von Mathematiklehrern möglich? - Reflexion der Erfahrungen eines Fortbildungskurses im Bereich der mathematischen Modellierung

  1-20

  Gabriella Ambrus

  Ödön Vancsó

  Views:

  6

  Based on the material which was worked out within the project LEMA (2006-2009) pilot-teacher training courses were organized in the six partner countries, so in Hungary as well in the subject: Practice of Modelling tasks in the classroom. According to the tests which were filled out by the participants the conclusion was formulated that they achieved some changes in their pedagogical knowledge and in their estimation concerning their self-efficacy, but they didn't have shown any changes in their beliefs of mathematics and mathematics education. However according to their experience as project partners and leaders of the Hungarian course the authors have the idea that despite of the international results there are changes in this subject in the case of the Hungarian participants. This way can formulated the question:
  Which changes can be observed in the case of the participants concerning belief towards mathematics and mathematics education after the course and how long-lasting these changes are?
  The question is examined on the example of two teachers who were participants of the course.