Papers

Market institutions precede market beliefs: a test with cross-country regressions

Published:
2017-06-12
Author
View
Keywords
How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Czeglédi, P. (2017). Market institutions precede market beliefs: a test with cross-country regressions. Competitio, 16(1.), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2017/1/1
Abstract

The paper examines the literature on culture, economic growth and institutions to derive hypotheses about the relationships between market beliefs, institutions, and productivity. It then tests these hypotheses with cross-country regressions. First, it points out that each of the four cause-and-effect hypotheses of the possible relationships have an economic literature, in that market beliefs are seen as parts of culture. Second, the paper tests these hypotheses by making use of the fact that they consider different variables as exogenous ones. Measures of market beliefs are the coefficients of the country-dummies in the regressions run with individual data from the World Values Survey. The tests support the two hypotheses which hold that it is institutions, not market beliefs, that are exogenous.

Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) codes: L26, O43, P16

References
  1. Alesina, A. – Devleeschauwer, A. – Easterly, W. – Kurlat, S. – Wacziarg, R. (2003): Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 8, No. 2:155–194.
  2. Alesina, A. – Giuliano, P. (2015): Culture and Institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 53, No. 4:898–944.
  3. Arruñada, B. (2010): Protestants and Catholics: Similar Work Ethic, Different Social Ethic. Economic Journal, Vol. 120, No. 547:890–918.
  4. Ács Zoltán – Szerb László – Autio, E. (2014): Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2014. The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute, Washington D.C., USA.
  5. Barro, R. J. (2003): Religion adherence Data. http://scholar.harvard.edu/barro/publications/religion-adherence-data, Letöltve: 2016. 08. 12.
  6. Barro, R. J. (2015): Convergence and Modernization. Economic Journal, Vol. 125, No. 585:911–942.
  7. Bjørnskov, C. – Paldam, M. (2012): The Spirits of Capitalism and Socialism. A Cross-country Study of Ideology. Public Choice, Vol. 150, Iss. 3-4:469–498.
  8. Caplan, B. (2007): The Myth of the Rational Voter. Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  9. Christoffersen, H. – Paldam, M. (2006): Privatization in Denmark. 1980–2002. In Köthenburger, M. – Sinn, H.-W. – Whalley, J. (eds.): Privatization Experiences in the European Union. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.:117–14
  10. Cebula, R. J. – Hall, J. C. – Mixon, F. G. Jr. – Payne, J. E. (eds.) (2015): Economic Behavior, Economic Freedom, and Entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
  11. Coyne, C. J. – Sobel, R. S. – Dove, J. A. (2010): The Non-productive Entrepreneurial Process. Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 23, No. 4:333–346.
  12. Czeglédi Pál (2017): Productivity, Institutions, and Market Beliefs: Three Entrepreneurial Interpretations. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Vol. 6, Iss. 2. forthcoming.
  13. Dekker, E. (2016): The Viennese Students of Civilization: The Meaning and Context of Austrian Economics Reconsidered. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  14. Facchini, F. (2002): Complex Individualism and Legitimacy of Absolute Property Rights. European Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 13, Iss. 1:35–46.
  15. Feenstra, R. C. – Inklaar, R. – Timmer, M. P. (2015): The Next Generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review, Vol. 105, No. 10:3150–3182.
  16. Friedman, M. – Friedman, R. (1998/1980): Választhatsz szabadon. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, MET Publishing Corporation, Florida, USA.
  17. Gallup, J. L. – Mellinger, A. D. – Sachs, J. D. (2001): Geography Datasets, General Measures of Geography. http://www.cid.harvard.edu/ciddata/geographydata.htm, Letöltve: 2017. 08. 12.
  18. Guiso, L. – Sapienza, P. – Zingales, L. (2003): People’s Opium? Religion and Economic Attitudes. Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 50, Iss. 1:225–282.
  19. Guiso, L. – Sapienza, P. – Zingales, L. (2006): Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 20, No. 2:23–48.
  20. Gwartney, J. – Lawson, R. – Hall, J. (2015): Economic Freedom of the World 2013 Annual Report. The Fraser Institute, Vancouver, Canada.
  21. Hansson, G. (2009): What Determines Rule of Law? An Empirical Investigation of Rival Models. Kyklos, Vol. 62, Iss. 3:371–393.
  22. Hayek, F. A. (1992): Végzetes önhittség: A szocializmus tévedései. Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest.
  23. Hayek, F. A. (1995/1967): Értelmiségiek és a szocializmus. In: Hayek, F. A. (1995): Piac és szabadság. Válogatott tanulmányok. KJK, Budapest:221–238.
  24. Heilbroner, R. L. (1999/1953): The Worldly Philosophers: The Lives, Times, and Ideas of the Great Economic Thinkers, Revised Seventh Edition, Kindle Edition, Touchstone, New York.
  25. Higgs, R. (2012/1987): Crisis and Leviathan. Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, The Independent Institute, Oakland, CA.
  26. Hirschmann, A. O. (1982): Rival Interpretations of Market Society: Civilizing, Destructive, or Feeble? Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 20, No. 4:1463–1484.
  27. Holcombe, R. G. (2002): Political Entrepreneurship and the Democratic Allocation of Economic Resources. Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 15, Iss. 2-3:143–159
  28. Kapás Judit (2016): A kultúra szerepre a gazdasági növekedésben: összefoglalás, kritika és továbblépési utak. Competitio, 15 évf., 2.. sz.:22–44.
  29. Keynes, J. M. (1965/1936): A foglalkoztatás, a kamat és a pénz általános elmélete. Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvkiadó, Budapest.
  30. Kirzner, I. M. (1973): Competition and Entrepreneurship. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  31. Kirzner, I. M. (1997): Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 35, No. 1:60–85.
  32. Kirzner, I. M. (1999): Creativity and/or Alertness: A Reconsideration of the Schumpeterian Entrepreneur. Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 11, Iss. 1:5–17.
  33. Koster, F. (2010): Welfare state attitudes and economic integration in the European Union, 1992–2002: a multilevel investigation across 24 countries. Policy and Politics, Vol. 38, No. 2:177–195.
  34. La Porta, R. – Lopez-de-Silanes, F. – Shleifer, A. (2008): The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 46, No. 2:285–332.
  35. Langlois, R. N. (2016): Institutions for Getting Out of the Way. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 12, No. 1:53–61.
  36. Leighton, W. A. – López, E. J. (2013): Madmen, Intellectuals, and Academic Scribbles: The Economic Engine of Political Change, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
  37. Levine, R. (2005): Law, Endowments and Property Rights. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 19, No. 3:61–88.
  38. Maoz, Z. – Henderson, A. A. (2013): The World Religion Dataset, 1945–2010: Logic, Estimates, and Trends. International Interactions, Vol. 39, Iss. 3:265–291. http://www.thearda.com/Archive/Files/Descriptions/WRDNATL.asp, Letöltve: 2016. 08. 12.
  39. McCloskey, D. N. (2006): Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  40. McCloskey, D. N. (2010): Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  41. McCloskey, D. N. (2016a): Bourgeois Equality: How Ideas, Not Capital or Institutions, Enriched the Modern World. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  42. McCloskey, D. N. (2016b): Max U versus Humanomics: a critique of neoinstitutionalism. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 12, Iss. 1:1–27.
  43. Migheli, M. (2010): Supporting the Free and Competitive Market in China and India: Differences and Evolution over Time, Economic Systems, Vol. 34, Iss. 1:73–-90.
  44. Migheli, M. (2016): Behind the Wall: What Remains of the “Communist Legacy” in Contemporary Europe. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 127, Iss. 2:671–690.
  45. Mijiyawa, A. G. (2013): Determinants of Property Rights Institutions: Survey of Literature and New Evidence. Economics of Governance, Vol. 14, Iss. 2:127–183.
  46. Minarik, P. (2014): Religion and economic attitudes in post-communist transition. Post-Communist Economies, Vol. 26, Iss. 1:67–88.
  47. Mises, L. von (1985/1927): Liberalism In the Classical Tradition. Cobden Press, San Francisco, California; The Foundation for Economic Education, Inc., Irvington-on-Hudson, New York; Institute for Humane Studies, Inc., Fairfax, Virginia.
  48. Mises, L. von (2008/1956): The Anti-capitalistic Mentality. The Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, Alabama.
  49. Mokyr, J. (2013): Cultural Entrepreneurs and the Origins of Modern Economic Growth. Scandinavian Economic History Review, Vol. 61, Iss. 1:1–33.
  50. Mokyr, J. (2017): A Culture of Growth: Origins of the Modern Economy. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
  51. North, D. C. (2010/1990): Intézmények, intézményi változás és gazdasági teljesítmény. Helikon Kiadó, Budapest.
  52. Schumpeter, J. A. (1980/1912): A gazdasági fejlődés elmélete. Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvkiadó, Budapest.
  53. Schumpeter, J. A. (2010/1943): Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Routledge, New York, NY.
  54. Világbank (2016): Worldwide Governance Indicators. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home, Letöltve: 2016. 02. 20).
  55. Voigt, S. (2016): How to Measure Informal Institutions. Working Paper available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2748214 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2748214.
  56. Weber, M. (1995/1905): A protestáns etika és a kapitalizmus szelleme. Cserépfalvi Könyvkiadó, Budapest.
  57. World Values Survey (1981–2014): Longitudinal Aggregate v.20150418.
  58. World Values Survey Association (www.worldvaluessurvey.org). Aggregate File Producer: JDSystems, Madrid Spain. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWVL.jsp, Letöltve: 2015. 11. 28.
  59. World Values Survey (2005): WV5 Questionnaire, Root Version. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV5.jsp, Letöltve: 2016. 02. 20.
  60. Zanden, J. L. van (2009) The Long Road to the Industrial Revolution. The European Economy in a Global Perspective, 1000–1800. Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands.