Search
Search Results
-
DECODING THE BLOCKCHAIN PRODUCTIVITY PARADOX IN SMES: A QUALITATIVE INVESTIGATION OF COGNITIVE BARRIERS AND INSTITUTIONAL PRESSURES
Views:0While blockchain technology (BCT) has emerged as a disruptive force capable of redefining trust and transparency in global supply chains, its adoption among Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) remains critically low, resulting in a severe digital productivity paradox. Existing literature predominantly attributes this technological lag to financial constraints and complex technical requirements. This study challenges the traditional cost-centric paradigm by exploring the underlying cognitive, organizational, and institutional factors driving SME decision-making. Utilizing a qualitative, exploratory research design, 22 semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with strategic decision-makers across five SME sectors in Hungary. The theoretical framework synthesized the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), and Institutional Theory. An innovative "negative proof" thought experiment—assuming 100% external funding—was applied to rigorously isolate cognitive barriers from financial constraints. The findings reveal that the primary barrier to adoption is a fundamental cognitive gap: the lack of technological awareness, profound fears regarding transparency (e.g., GDPR conflicts, trade secrets), and exceptionally low perceived business usefulness. Furthermore, SME innovation strategies regarding decentralized networks are structurally reactive. Adoption intentions are almost exclusively driven by coercive institutional isomorphism—specifically, the mandates of dominant multinational partners and regulatory compliance—rather than internal innovativeness. These insights emphasize that BCT must be treated as a socio-technical system, necessitating proactive mentoring from large corporate integrators and targeted regulatory frameworks to bridge the technological divide.
-
SOCIO‑ECONOMIC DRIVERS AND INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES OF TOBACCO CONTRACT FARMING PARTICIPATION IN SVOSVE COMMUNAL AREA, ZIMBABWE
Views:0Tobacco remains Zimbabwe's Leading agricultural export crop, increasingly produced under contract farming arrangements. While contract farming offers inputs, technical assistance and assured markets, concerns persist that benefits are skewed towards merchancts rather than smallholder farmers. This study investigates the determinants of smallholder participation in tobacco contract farming in ward 22, Svosve communal area, Marondera District, Mashonaland East Province. Guided by the New Institutional Economics(NIE) theory, which emphasises the role of institutions in reducing transaction cost under market imperfections, a mixed methods approach was employed. Quantitative data were from 246 communal tobacco farmers using qestionnaires, while qualitative insights were gathered from 10 key informant interviews with agricultural business advisory officers(ABAO), tobacco merchants and farmer leaders. Multistage sampling was used select 5 villages;Mere 1, Mere 2, Mere 3, Neshamba and Bonda. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression in SPSS version 25. The statistics revealed that contracted farmers had higher education levels(10 years), larger landholding(mean 2.1 hacters) and greater access to irrigation(65%) than their counterparts. The regression model was statistically significant (F = 24.73, p < 0.001) with a strong explanatory power (R² = 0.68; Adjusted R² = 0.65). Results showed that landholding size (β = 0.62) and years in contract farming (β = 0.45) were the strongest positive predictors of participation, followed by irrigation access (β = 0.38), household income (β = 0.31), and education level (β = 0.29). In contrast, multiple income sources (β = -0.27) and years in general agriculture (β = -0.27) negatively influenced participation, indicating that diversified and highly experienced farmers were less inclined to join contracts. The discussion highlighted that resource endowments and institutional support drive participation, while lack of collateral and financial literacy hinder broader inclusion. The study concludes that contract farming remains a viable pathway for smallholder integration into value chains but requires reforms to ensure equitable benefits. Policy implications emphasize collateral support, farmer training, and resource provision particularly land development and irrigation infrastructure to enhance participation and productivity among smallholder farmers.
-
Use of coordination spheres in food economics
69-71Views:311The coordination plays central role in the economics. The conventional economic theory looks at the market and enterprise (or hierarchy) as two different, separated manner of coordination of economic goods and services. However the modern organization theory, price theory and institutional economics show that different types (not only market and enterprise, but also several types of hybrid forms) of coordination (or governance structure) necessarily live together in the current economic system. Based on my previous research on the field of regional clusters in the food industry I came to the conclusion that the cluster is one of the spheres where economic coordination can occur.At the same time I pointed out that the ways of coordination can be ordered on an ordinary scale according to its normative or positive nature. I’ve also found that the choice between the coordination spheres (market, enterprise or cluster) is not arbitrary, but instead depends on the interest’s dimension which is represented by the exchange of goods and services in question.
-
Is there a kink in the happiness literature?
131-139Views:826One of the early key empirical findings of the happiness literature is that at higher levels of per capita real income there appears to be diminishing returns to income at least with regards to marginal changes in ‘happiness’ measured by various survey instruments. Although these results have been recently challenged, these earlier findings and the results of many contemporary studies suggest that an inelastic relationship exists between real per capita income and happiness after a relatively low threshold of per capita income is reached. Appling some of the results of prospect theory I argue that even if it were true that the marginal effect of income on happiness is zero, a reduction in income would probably reduce the level of happiness, yielding a kink in the ‘happiness curve’. Also, applying a target income approach to the happiness literature, one can argue that pursuing higher target income, in itself, is a means of increasing life satisfaction. These two theoretical instruments yield results consistent with some of the most recent empirical finding based on Gallup Poll Survey data. In addition, applying insights from the capabilities approach, I argue, that increasing income is a means of purchasing the capabilities to increase individual levels of happiness through the production of public goods, such as health care and education. A given marginal increase in income need not generate any increase in happiness if this income increase is highly unequally distributed in a population or is not used to purchase goods and services that contribute to increases in the level of happiness.
Keywords
