dEjournals Nyitóoldal
Competitio
Online megjelent Aktuális Legtöbbet olvasott Archívum Keresés
Regisztráció Bejelentkezés

Competitio

Évf. 3 szám 1 (2004)
Tanulmányok

Roadmap for the adoption of the euro in Hungary: dangers and opportunities

Megjelent:
August 27, 2020
DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2004/1/9
Szerző
Jankovics László
Megtekintés
en
How To Cite
Kiválasztott formátum: APA
Jankovics, L. (2020). Roadmap for the adoption of the euro in Hungary: dangers and opportunities. Competitio, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2004/1/9
Absztrakt

In April 2003, the EU Accession Agreement was officially signed for the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and the Slovak Republic. These countries are destined to become EU members in May 2004. As part of the “acquis communautaire”, participation in the new version of the exchange rate mechanism (ERM II), and subsequently in the European Monetary Union (EMU) is obligatory for all new EU members (no opt-out clause is available). Therefore, the question today for the accession countries is no longer whether or not to enter the eurozone but rather the time horizon when the entry should happen.

Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) code: E42, E58, F33.

Hivatkozások
  1. BACKÉ, PETER – WÓJCIK, CEZARY [2002]: Unilateral Euroization: a Suitable Road towards Joining the Euro Area for Central and Eastern European EU Accession Countries? In: Sepp, Urmas – Randveer Martti (eds): Alternative Regimes in Entry to EMU. Bank of Estonia, Talinn
  2. BARABÁS GYULA (ED) [2003]: Coping with the Speculative Attack against the Forint’s Band. National Bank of Hungary, Background studies, No. 3. Budapest
  3. BRATKOWSKI, ANDRZEJ – ROSTOWSKI, JACEK [2000]: The EU Attitude to Unilateral Euroisation: Misunderstandings, Real Concerns, and Ill-designed Admission Criteria.
  4. In Brzeski, Andrzej – Winiecki, Jan (eds): A Liberating Economic Journey: Post-Communist Transition, The Cromwell Press for CRCE
  5. BEGG, DAVID – EICHENGREEN, BARRY – HALPERN LÁSZLÓ – VON HAGEN, JÜRGEN – WYPLOSZ, CHARLES [2001]: Sustainable Regimes of Capital Movements in Accession Countries. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London
  6. BENCZES ISTVÁN [2003]: A Stabilitási és Növekedési Paktum kritikai értékelése. (Critical Assessment of the Stability and Growth Pact). Európai Tükör, No. 4-5. pp. 59-78.
  7. BOKROS LAJOS [2000]: Visegrad Twins’ Diverging Path to Relative Prosperity. Comparing the Transition Experience of the Czech Republic and Hungary. Paper presented at the Conference of the Czech National Bank, Prague, September 22
  8. BUITER, WILLEM H. – GRAFE, CLEMENS [2001]: Central Banking and the Choice of Currency Regime in Accession Countries, Société Universitaire Européenne de Recherhes Financières (SUERF) Studies, No. 11. Wien
  9. CORICELLI, FABRIZIO [2002]: Excange Rate Policy during Transition to the European Monetary Union: The Option of Euroization. Economics of Transition, Vol. 10. No. 2. pp. 405-417.
  10. CSAJBÓK ATTILA-CSERMELY ÁGNES (EDS) [2002]: Adopting the Euro in Hungary: Expected Costs, Benefits and Timing. National Bank of Hungary, Occasional Papers 24.
  11. CSABA LÁSZLÓ [2002]: Pótlólagos felvételi követelmény-e az euróérettség? (The Euro – a New Entry Barrier?) Külgazdaság, No. 2. (February) pp. 32-46.
  12. CSABA LÁSZLÓ [2003]: A Non-Stability and Anti-Growth Pact for Europe? Paper presented at the conference of „From here and from There: New and Old Members’ Perception on EU Enlargement”. Groningen, September 25-27.
  13. GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY [2003]: Pre-Accession Economic Programme of Hungary 2003. Budapest
  14. GROS, DANIEL [2000]: How Fit are the Candidates for EMU? The World Economy, Vol. 23. No. 10. pp. 1367-1378.
  15. HORVATH, JULIUS [2003]: Optimal Currency Area Theory: A Selective Review. BOFIT Discussion Papers, No. 15.
  16. JANKOVICS LÁSZLÓ [2002]: The Bumpy Road to EMU – Similarities and Discrepancies in the Accession Countries. Paper presented at the ICEG EC International Conference on „Exchange Rate Strategies During EU Enlargement”. Budapest, November 27-30.
  17. JONAS, JIRI – MISHKIN, FREDERIC S. [2003]: Inflation Targeting in Transition Countries: Experience and Prospects. NBER Working paper 9667
  18. KOPINT DATORG [2003]: Economic Trends in Transition Economies. Vol. 12. No. 2. Budapest
  19. KOPITS GYÖRGY [2002]: Central European EU Accession and Latin American Integration: Mutual Lessons in Macroeconomic Policy Design. Oesterreichische Nationalbank, Working Paper 75.
  20. KOPITS GYÖRGY-SZÉKELY P. ISTVÁN [2003]: Fiscal Policy Challenges of EU Accession for the Baltics and Central Europe. In: Tumpel-Gugerell, Gertrude – Mooslechner, Peter (eds): Structural Challenges for Europe, Edward Elgar (forthcoming)
  21. MCKINNON, R. I. [1963]: Optimum Currency Areas. The American Economic Review, Vol. 53. pp. 717-725.
  22. MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS [2003]: Treaty of Accession. Official website (http://www.kulugyminiszterium.hu)
  23. MLADEK, JAN [2003]: Csehország és az euró. (The Czech Republic and the euro.) Európai Szemle, No. 1-2. pp. 79-84.
  24. MUNDELL, ROBERT [1961]: A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas. The American Economic Review, Vol 51. pp. 657-664.
  25. NBH [2002]: Monetary Policy in Hungary. National Bank of Hungary, Budapest
  26. NEMÉNYI JUDIT [2003]: Az euró bevezetésének feltételei Magyarországon. (The conditions of the introduction of the euro in Hungary). Közgazdasági Szemle, No. 6. (June) pp. 479-504.
  27. NUTI, D. MARIO [2002]: Costs and benefits of unilateral euroization in central and eastern Europe. Economics of Transition, Vol 10. No. 2. pp. 419-444.
  28. OBLATH GÁBOR [2003]: Az euró haza bevezetése: Belül biztonságosabb. (Introducing the euro in Hungary: It is Safer Inside) Figyelő, Vol. 47. No. 18. pp. 24-28.
  29. POLGÁR ÉVA KATALIN [2003]: Az Európai Monetáris Rendszer és az ERM-2. (The European Monetary System and the ERM-2). Közgazdasági Szemle, No. 4. (April) pp. 479-504.
Ugyanannak a szerző(k)nek a legtöbbet olvasott cikkei