Tanulmányok

Economic Freedom and the Process of Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis Based on a New Measure

Megjelent:
2010-06-14
Szerzők
Megtekintés
Kulcsszavak
Hogyan hivatkozzuk
Kiválasztott formátum: APA
Kapas, J., & Czegledi, P. (2010). Economic Freedom and the Process of Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis Based on a New Measure. Competitio, 9(1), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2010/1/1
Absztrakt

This paper, relying on a conceptualization of economic freedom in terms of kinds of government actions, develops a new measure of economic freedom. However, this is not art for art’s sake; instead, it allows us to provide an explanation for how particular institutions of economic freedom enhance economic development, a view upon which scholars agree. We develop two concepts related to economic freedom, namely the freedom-compatible and freedom-non-compatible institutions and use them as tools in an analysis of the process of economic growth, especially the relationship between economic freedom and long-run income. The major argument is that freedom-compatible institutions are primary determinants of income, while freedom-non-compatible institutions depend upon them and are partly the outcomes of the growth process itself, a fact which is explained by the Misesian theory of interventionism. Our regression analyses support our theoretical insights.

JEL Classification: B53, H10, O10

Hivatkozások
  1. Acemoglu, D. (2005): Constitutions, Politics, and Economics: A Review Essay on Persson and Tabellini’s ‘The Economic Effects of Constitutions’. Journal of Economic Literature 43. 4: 1025–1048.
  2. Bardhan, P. (1997): Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues. Journal of Economic Literature 35. 3: 1320-1346.
  3. Bardhan, P. (2006): The Economist’s Approach to the Problem of Corruption. World Development 34. 2: 341–348.
  4. Barro, R. J. – Lee, J. W. (2001): International Data on Educational Attainment: Updates and Implications. Oxford Economic Papers 53. 3: 541–63.
  5. Barro, R. J., – Sala-i-Martin, X. (2003): Economic Growth. Second Edition. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  6. Beck, T. – Clarke, G. – Groff, A. – Keefer, Ph. – Walsh, P. (2001): New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions. World Bank Economic Review 15. 1: 165-176.
  7. Blake, M. (2001): Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 30. 3: 257-296.
  8. Block, W. (2006): Paul Craig Roberts on Empirical Measures of Economic Freedom: A Rejoinder. International Journal of Social Economics 33. 7: 481–490.
  9. Botero, J. C. – Djankov, S. – La Porta, R. – Lopez-de-Silanez, F. – Shleifer, A. (2004): The Regulation of Labor. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119. 4: 1339–1382.
  10. Czeglédi, P. – Kapás, J. (2009): Economic Freedom and Development. An Austrian Economics Perspective. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
  11. De Haan, J. – Sturm, J. E. (2000): On the Relationship Between Economic Freedom and Economic Growth. European Journal of Political Economy 16. 2: 215–241.
  12. Djankov, S. – La Porta, R. – Lopez-de-Silanez, F. – Shleifer, A. (2002): The Regulation of Entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117. 1: 1–37.
  13. Djankov, S. – La Porta, R. – Lopez-de-Silanes, F. – Shleifer, A. (2003): Courts. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118. 2: 453–517.
  14. Djankov, S. – McLiesh, C. – Ramalho, R. (2006): Regulation and Growth. Economics Letters 92. 3: 395–401.
  15. Easton, S. T. – Walker, M. A. (1997): Income, Growth, and Economic Freedom. American Economic Review 87. 2. Papers and Proceedings, pp. 328–332.
  16. Fallon, Jr, R. H. (1997): The Rule of Law as a Concept in Constitutional Discourse. Columbia Law Review 97. 1:1-56.
  17. Feld, L. P. – Voigt, S. (2003): Economic Growth and Judicial Independence: Cross Country Evidence Using a New Set of Indicators. European Journal of Political Economy 19. 3: 497–527.
  18. Freedom House. (2007): Freedom in the World Country Ratings. Freedom House, Washington, D. C. http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=15
  19. Friedman, M. (1962): Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  20. Gwartney, J. D. – Holcombe, R. G. – Lawson, R. A. (2004): Economic Freedom, Institutional Quality, and Cross-Country Differences in Income and Growth. Cato Journal 24. 3: 205–233.
  21. Gwartney, J. D. – Holcombe, R. G. – Lawson, R. A. (2006): Institutions and the Impact of Investment on Growth. Kyklos 59. 2: 255–273.
  22. Gwartney, J. D. – Lawson, R. (2009): Economic Freedom of the World. 2009 Annual Report. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.
  23. Gwartney, J. D. – Lawson, R. (2008): Economic Freedom of the World. 2008 Annual Report. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.
  24. Hayek, F. A. (1944 [1971]): The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge.
  25. Hayek, F. A. (1960): The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  26. Hayek, F. A. (1973): Law, Legislation, and Liberty. Volume I. Rules and Order. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  27. Hayo, B. – Voigt, S. (2007a): Explaining De Facto Judicial Independence. International Review of Law and Economics 27. 3: 269–290.
  28. Heckelman J. C. – Stroup M. D. (2000): Which Economic Freedoms Contribute to Growth? Kyklos 53. 4:527-544.
  29. Heckelman, J. C. – Stroup, M. D (2002): Which Economic Freedoms Contribute to Growth? Reply. Kyklos 55. 3:417-420.
  30. Heitger, B. (2004): Property Rights and the Wealth of Nations: A Cross-Country Study. Cato Journal 23. 3: 381–402.
  31. Heston, A. –– Summers, R. – Aten, B. (2006): Penn World Table Version 6.2. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania.
  32. Hodgson, G. M. – Jiang, S. (2007): The Economics of Corruption and the Corruption of Economics: An Institutionalist Perspective. Journal of Economic Issues 41. 4: 1043–1061.
  33. Holmes, K. R. – Feulner, E. J. – O’Grady, M. A. (2008): 2008 Index of Economic Freedom. Washington, D. C. and New York: Heritage Foundation and The Wall Street Journal.
  34. Hume, D. (1739): A Treatise on Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects. Reprinted from the Original Edition in three volumes, and edited,
  35. with an analytical index, by L.A. Selby-Bigge, M.A. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1896. Available: http://oll.libertyfund.org/index.php?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=342&layout=html. Accessed May 15, 2009.
  36. Ikeda, S. (1997): Dynamics of the Mixed Economy: Toward a Theory of Interventionism. London: Routledge.
  37. Kane, T. – Holmes, K. R. – O’Grady, M. A. (2007) 2007 Index of Economic Freedom. Washington, D. C. and New York: Heritage Foundation and The Wall Street Journal.
  38. Kaufmann, D. – Kraay, A. – Mastruzzi, M. (2003): Governance Matters III: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996–2002. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3106. Washington, D. C.: The World Bank.
  39. Kaufmann, D. – Kraay, A. – Mastruzzi, M. (2006): Measuring Governance Using Cross-Country Panel Perceptions Data. In: Rose-Ackerman, S. (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 52–104.
  40. Kaufmann, D. – Kraay, A. – Mastruzzi, M. (2007): Governance Matters VI: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996-2006. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4280. Washington, D. C.: The World Bank.
  41. Khan, M. H. (2006): Determinants of Corruption in Developing Countries: The Limits of Conventional Economic Analysis. In: Rose-Ackerman, S. (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 216–244.
  42. La Porta, R. – Lopez-de-Silanes, F. – Shleifer, A. (2008): The Economic Consequences of Legal Origin. Journal of Economic Literature 46. 2: 285-332.
  43. Locke, J. (1690): An Essay Concerning the True Original Extent and End of Civil Government. In: Locke, J., Two Treatises of Government. A New Edition, Corrected in Ten Volumes, Volume V. London: Thomas
  44. Tegg. 1823. Available: http://socserv2.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/locke/government.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2009.
  45. Maddala, G. S. (1992): Introduction to Econometrics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  46. Mankiw, N. G. – Romer, D. – Weil, D. N. (1992): A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107. 2: 407–437.
  47. McCloskey, D. N. (1999): Learning to Love Globalization. Eastern Economic Journal 25. 1: 117-121.
  48. Mises, L. (1929 [1996]): A Critique of Interventionism. New York: Foundation for Economic Education, Irvington-on-Hudson.
  49. Mises, L. (1940 [1998]): Interventionism: An Economic Analysis. New York: Foundation for Economic Education, Irvington-on-Hudson.
  50. Mises, L. (1949): Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Third Revised Edition. Chicago: Contemporary Books, Inc. 1963.
  51. Mulligan, C. – Shleifer, A. (2005): The Extent of the Market and the Supply of Regulation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120. 4: 1445–1473.
  52. Paldam, M. – Gundlach, E. (2008): Two Views on Institutions and Development: The Grand Transition vs. the Primacy of Institutions. Kyklos 61. 1: 65–100.
  53. Rose-Ackerman, S. (2006): Introduction and Overview. In: Rose-Ackerman, S. (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. xiv–xxxviii.
  54. Shleifer, A. – Vishny, R. W. (1993): Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108. 3: 599–617.
  55. Smith, A. (1776): An Inquiry into the Nature And Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: The Adam Smith Institute. Electronic Edition, 2001. Available: http://www.adamsmith.org/smith/won-index.htm. Accessed May 15, 2009.
  56. Sturm, J. E. – De Haan, J. (2001): How Robust Is the Relationship Between Economic Freedom and Growth. Applied Economics 33. 7: 839–844.
  57. Svensson, J. (2005): Eight Questions about Corruption. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19. 3: 19–42.
  58. Weingast, B. R. (1995): The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 11. 1: 1–31.
  59. World Bank (2006): Doing Business 2007. How to Reform. Washington, D. C.