Articles

Vegetative parameters of sweet cherry (Cerasus avium L.) cultivars in two training systems

Published:
July 29, 2019
Authors
View
Keywords
License

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Csihon, Á., Dremák, P., Vámos, P., Bicskei, D. K. ., & Holb, I. J. . (2019). Vegetative parameters of sweet cherry (Cerasus avium L.) cultivars in two training systems. International Journal of Horticultural Science, 25(1-2), 42-45. https://doi.org/10.31421/IJHS/25/1-2./2913
Abstract

Hungarian sweet cherry production has been changed recently. Thanks to the favourable selling prices many new plantations were established in the last years. In the new orchards mainly spindle canopy are trained, although many type of crown forms are used all over the world. In our study slender spindle and bush canopy were evaluated with three cultivars (‘Petrus’, ‘Vera’, ‘Carmen’) grafted on Prunus mahaleb rootstock. Vigor of the 3-4 years old trees showed spectacular differences. The highest vigor with Spanish bush was found for cv. ‘Vera’, but on slender spindle canopy the thickness values were medium. Meanwhile cv. ‘Petrus’ showed the highest trunk thickness with spindle canopy, but the lowest with Spanish bush. On spindle canopy cv. ‘Carmen’ presented the highest ramification ability, but its 2-3 years old twigs started to bald very early, which can be considered an unfavorable phenomenon. Bush canopy still can be described with strong vegetative growth on 3-4 years old trees, as vigor of spindle trees are more moderate.

References
  1. Balmer, M., Blanke, M. M. (2005): Developments in high density cherries in Germany. Acta Horticulturae 667: 273-277. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.667.40
  2. Bicskei D, K., Gonda, I. (2014). Comparative analisis of different canopy forms of sweet cherry cultivars. Acta Agraria Debreceniensis (56): 19-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34101/actaagrar/56/1926
  3. Bujdosó, G. (2006): Cseresznyetermesztés Spanyolországban. Kertgazdaság. 38(4): 109-114.
  4. Csihon, Á. (2015): Új almafajták növekedési, terméshozási és gyümölcsminőségi tulajdonságainak vizsgálata. Doktori értekezés. DE MÉK. 173. pp.
  5. Csihon, Á., Holb, I., Gonda, I. (2015): Growing characteristics of apple cultivars and canopies. International Journal of Horticultural Science 21(1-2): 7-10. https://doi.org/10.31421/IJHS/21/1-2./1150
  6. Gonda, I., Király, K., Holb, I. (2007): Examination of growth of cherry cultivars adapted to intensive production. Acta Horticulturae 732: 429–434. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.732.64
  7. Hrotkó K. (2003): A cseresznye és a meggy művelési rendszerei. In: Cseresznye és meggy. Edited: Hrotkó K. Mezőgazda Kiadó. Budapest. 152-169.
  8. Hrotkó, K., Magyar, L., Simon, G., Gyeviki, M. (2007): Development in intensive orchard systems of cherries in Hungary. International Journal of Horticultural Science, 13(3): 76-86. https://doi.org/10.31421/IJHS/13/3/751
  9. Negrón, C., Lemus, G., Valenzuela, J. (2001): Comparison among Solaxe and Spanish bush training systems for Rainier and Van sweet cherries in the Chilean central zone growing area. Acta Horticulturae 667. 373-378.
  10. Soltész, M., Szabó, Z., Nyéki, J. (2000): Training systems of fruit trees in Hungary. International Journal of Horticultural Science, 6(1): 123-127. https://doi.org/10.31421/IJHS/6/1/82.
  11. Tomcsányi, P. (1973): Piacos kertészet. Mezőgazdasági Kiadó, Budapest. 632. pp.
  12. Vaszily, B., Gonda, I. (2010): Training and maintaining spindle crowns in cherry production. International Journal of Horticultural Science, 16(3): 51-53. https://doi.org/10.31421/IJHS/16/3/896
  13. Whiting, M.D., Lang, G., Ophardt, D., (2005): Rootstock and training system affect sweet cherry growth, yield, and fruit quality. HortScience 40: 582–586. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.40.3.582
  14. Zahn, F. G. (1996): Close planting in relation to low orchard height. Horticultural Science, 28(1-2): 58-66.