dEjournals Home Page
Teaching Mathematics and Computer Science
Home Current Archives Search
Register Login

Teaching Mathematics and Computer Science

Vol. 22 No. 1 (2024)
Articles

Fostering Engineering freshmen’s shifts of attention by using Matlab LiveScript for solving mathematical tasks

Published:
2024-07-12
DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.5485/TMCS.2024.13299
Authors
Giovannina Albano,
Agnese Ilaria Telloni
View
PDF
Keywords
mathematics education shifts of attention University Transition Matlab
License

Copyright (c) 2024 Agnese Ilaria Telloni, Giovannina Albano

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Albano, G., & Telloni, A. I. (2024). Fostering Engineering freshmen’s shifts of attention by using Matlab LiveScript for solving mathematical tasks. Teaching Mathematics and Computer Science, 22(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5485/TMCS.2024.13299
Abstract

We designed an experimental path including a summative assessment phase, where engineering freshmen are involved in solving mathematical tasks by using Matlab LiveScripts. We analyzed the students’ answers to a questionnaire about their perceived impact of the use of Matlab on their way to solve mathematical tasks. The main result is that students show shifts of attention from computations to other aspects of problem solving, moving from an operational to a structural view of mathematics.

Subject Classification: 97U70, 97H60

References
  1. Albano, G., Donatiello, A., & Telloni, A. I. (2023). Towards relational thinking by Matlab LiveScript in linear algebra. In P. Drijvers, Cs. Csapodi, H. Palmér, K. Gosztonyi, & E. Kónya (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME13)
  2. (pp. 2251–2258). Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics and ERME.
  3. Buchberger, B. (1990). Should students learn integration rules? ACM SIGSAM Bulletin. 24 (1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/382276.1095228
  4. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
  5. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19 (5), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176100
  6. Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2010). ’Me and maths’: Towards a definition of attitude grounded on students’ narratives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13 (1), 27–48.
  7. Harel, G., Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2006). Advanced mathematical thinking. Some PME perspectives. In Á. Gutiérrez, & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 147–172). Sense Publishers.
  8. Jaworski, B., Robinson, C., Matthews, J., & Croft, A. C. (2012). Issues in teaching mathematics to engineering students to promote conceptual understanding: A study of the use of GeoGebra and inquiry-based tasks. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 19 (4), 147–152.
  9. Kent, P., Bakker, A., Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2005a). Techno-mathematical literacies in the workplace. MSOR Connections, 5 (1), 5–7.
  10. Mason, J. (1998). Enabling teachers to be real teachers: Necessary levels of awareness and structure of attention. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1 (3), 243–267.
  11. Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1–36.
  12. Sfard A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge University Press.
Most read articles by the same author(s)