Editors

We are strongly committed to promoting the highest ethical publication practices and expect all corresponding authors to uphold the high standards of publication ethics set out by the Commission on Publication Ethics (COPE). Any cases of ethical misconduct will be dealt with following the COPE guidelines.

Editors
● hold full authority to reject/accept an article;
● preserve the anonymity of reviewers to authors and vice versa preserve the anonymity of authors to reviewers;
● have no conflict of interest concerning articles they reject/accept.

All submissions are subject to peer review and editorial control of length and style.
If the Editors judge that the manuscript meets the aims and scope of the journal Teaching Mathematics and Computer Science, it is sent to two Reviewers after a plagiarism check. If the opinions of the two Reviewers differ significantly, the Editors will also seek the opinion of a third Reviewer. After the manuscript has been reviewed, a decision is sent to the Corresponding Author, along with recommendations made by the referees. All manuscripts are reviewed as rapidly as possible, but the review process usually takes 3-5 months.

The Editorial Team is committed to a strict policy against plagiarism and false data. To this purpose, the Editor checks the originality of the manuscript using a plagiarism checker before starting the review process.
Whenever it is recognized that a published paper contains a significant inaccuracy, such as rearranging the authorship order, adding important information to the text, changing some data, or replacing an entry in the reference list, it will be corrected by submitting a correction notice.

Suppose it turns out that an already published article was unsuitable for publication for some well-based ethical reason. In that case, it will be retracted in an identifiable way to readers and indexing systems.