Search
Search Results
-
THE PEDAGOGICAL EXPERIMENT OF MONTESSORI-CONDUCTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE 2000-2003
11-23Views:339The researchers call Montessori's pedagogy developer or development pedagogy. In the past decade, in Hungary, it appeared as a development pedagogy in the pedagogical practice. The conductive education is a special, complex pedagogical method [6] because it takes into consideration special educational needs in planning and implementation. We can view Mária Montessori's method as a development pedagogical method because it's suitable for children with special educational needs. Her pedagogical work began with children with intellectual disabilities. The Montessori development method has not yet occurred in conductive education. With our research, we wanted to broaden the use of the Montessori method in the practice of special education and development pedagogy. We wanted to confirm the similarity and difference of the holistic approach of the two doctor-pedagogues. It's explicable with Pető's holistic approach, why didn't entrust the development of perception, speech, motion, and communication difficulties to people working in different places and time. We introduced the Montessori conductive educational practice experimentally in the semesters of 2000-2003 and 2007-2008, in accordance with the student's college education. The purpose of the program was to demonstrate the practical application of the elements of the two methods and their coordinated operation.
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT JOURNAL, 2024. Vol. 10.(SI)
1-183Views:89Journal of Special Treatment, 2024. Vol.10.(Special Issue) - full text
-
Special Treatment, 2024. Vol.10.(1)
1-136Views:97Journal of Special Treatment, 2024.Vol.10.(1) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2023. Vol. 9. (2.)
1-162Views:207Journal of Special Treatment, 2023. Vol. 9. (2.) - full text
-
THE IMPORTANCE OF PLAY - THE USE OF GAMES BY SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS TEACHER AND MAJORITY TEACHERS IN LESSONS
7-26Views:1131Nowadays, the priority task of pedagogy is to develop skills and basic competencies, because these are necessary for a successful teaching-learning process. In contrast to the traditional frontal education, which the learners treat as a passive recipient. The current education places more and more emphasis on exploration, action-based learning, and knowledge acquisition based on one's own experiences, which can be based on play and playful activity. Gameplays a key role in the development of skills and personality, so in this research, we examine the role of game in the teaching of typical and learning disabilities children. During the study, we used an online questionnaire, which was sent to special educational needs teachers and the majority of teachers working in schools in Hajdú-Bihar and Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg counties (N = 102 people). The distribution of the answers was even for each grade and school type, so we were able to form groups of 25 and 26 people. Our results reflect a different teaching method because special educational needs teachers use games much more often in their work and spend much more time on them compared to the majority of teachers. Special educational needs teachers attribute much more developmental effects to the game, so they use it more often in upper grades as well. The majority of teachers are dominated by info-communication tools, while special educational need teachers use several self-made tools. In terms of methods, teachers consider differentiation to be paramount, followed by an illustration and cooperative learning, while playing came in fourth place.
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2018. Vol. 3. (1.)
1-111Views:129Special Treatment, 2017. Vol. 3. (1.) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2018. Vol. 4. (3.)
1-121Views:254Special Treatment, 2018. Vol. 4. (3.) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2022. Vol. 8. (3.)
1-157Views:278Journal of Special Treatment, 2022. Vol. 8. (3.) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2015. Vol. 1. (3.)
1-90Views:192Special Treatment, 2015. Vol. 1. (3.) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2017. Vol. 3. (3.)
1-113Views:120Special Treatment, 2017. Vol. 3. (3.) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2022. Vol. 8. (1.)
1-140Views:226Journal of Special Treatment, 2022. Vol. 8. (1.) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2017. Vol. 3. (4.)
1-95Views:152Special Treatment, 2017. Vol. 3. (4.) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2019. Vol. 5. (4.)
1-87Views:165Special Treatment, 2019. Vol. 5. (4.) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2020. Vol. 6. (3.)
1-119Views:290Special Treatment, 2020. Vol. 6. (3.) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2019. Vol. 5. (1.)
1-91Views:158Special Treatment, 2019. Vol. 5. (1.) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2018. Vol. 2. (2.)
1-110Views:130Special Treatment, 2016. Vol. 2. (2.) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2020. Vol. 6. (1.)
1-112Views:279SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2020. Vol. 6. (1.) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2015. Vol. 1. (4.)
1-105Views:190Special Treatment, 2015. Vol. 1. (4.) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2023. Vol. 9. (4.)
1-162Views:105Journal of Special Treatment, 2023. Vol. 9. (4.) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2016. Vol. 2. (4.)
1-114Views:144Special Treatment, 2016. Vol. 2. (4.) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2015. Vol. 1. (2.)
1-103Views:130Special Treatment, 2015. Vol. 1. (2.) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2021. Vol. 7. (4.)
1-118Views:254Special Treatment, 2021. Vol. 7. (4.) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2020. Vol. 6. (4.) - FULL TEXT
1-111Views:254Special Treatment, 2020. Vol. 6. (4.) - full text
-
SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2017. Vol. 3. (2.)
1-122Views:148Special Treatment, 2017. Vol. 3. (2.) - full text
-
Special Treatment, 2024. Vol.10.(2)
1-107Views:62Journal of Special Treatment, 2024.Vol.10.(2) - full text