dEjournals Home Page
Competitio
Online ready Current Most Read Archives Search
Register Login

Competitio

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2013)
Papers

Oktatási jelzés és szűrés a munkaerőpiacon – az empirikus vizsgálatok tanulságai

Published:
2013-12-16
DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2013/2/3
Author
Andras Istvan Kun
View
PDF (Hungarian)
Keywords
jelzés szűrés információs aszimmetria munkaerőpiac oktatás
How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Kun, A. I. (2013). Oktatási jelzés és szűrés a munkaerőpiacon – az empirikus vizsgálatok tanulságai. Competitio, 12(2), 39-60. https://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2013/2/3
Abstract

Az oktatás jelző/szűrő hipotézise szerint az oktatási intézmények munkaerő-piaci funkciója nem csupán a tanulóik, hallgatóik munkavégző képességének (termelékenységének) növelése lehet, de mérhetik és jelezhetik is azt a munkaadók felé. A közgazdaságtan empirikus irodalmában az 1970-es évek óta
születnek újabb és újabb kísérletek ezen információs funkció igazolására, mérésére, mindeddig érdemi eredmény nélkül. Jelen tanulmány az oktatás, képzés munkaerő-piaci jelző/szűrő modelljeit és ezek empirikus irodalmát elemzi, mely során arra keresi a választ milyen okok állhatnak a tesztelési kísérletek
sorozatos kudarcai mögött. Legfőbb megállapítása szerint a méréseknek vissza kell térniük az elméleti modellekhez, mert túlzottan elszakadtak azoktól és az oktatás vállalati hasznosulásának vizsgálatára kell koncentrálniuk.

Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: I21, J21

References
  1. Akerlof, G. A. (1970): The Market for „Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 84., no. 3., 488-500.
  2. Alba-Ramírez, A. – Segundo, M. J. S. (1995): Returns to Education in Spain. Economics of Education Review, vol. 14., no. 2., 155-166.
  3. Albrecht, J. W. (1981): Procedure for testing the signalling hypothesis. Journal of Public Economics, vol. 15., no. 1., 123-132.
  4. Albrecht, J. W. – Ours, J. C. van (2006): Using Employer Hiring Behavior to Test the Educational Signaling Hypothesis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 108., no. 3., 361-372.
  5. Alós-Ferrer, C. – Prat, J. (2012): Job market signaling and employer learning. Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 147., no. 5., 1787-1817.
  6. Altonji, J. G. – Pierret, C. R. (1996): Employer learning and the signaling value of education. Working paper 5438., National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
  7. Altonji, J. G. – Pierret, C. R. (2001): Employer Learning and Statistical Discrimination. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 116., no. 1., 313-350.
  8. Arabsheibani, G. (1989): The wiles test revisited. Economics Letters, vol. 29., no. 4., 361-364.
  9. Arabsheibani, G. R. – Rees, H. (1998): On the Weak vs. Strong Version of the Screening Hypothesis: A Re-Examination of the P-Test for the U.K. Economics of Education Review, vol. 17., no. 2., 189-192.
  10. Arkes, J. (1999): What Do Educational Credentials Signal and Why Do Employers Value Credentials? Economics of Education Review, vol. 18., no. 1., 133-141.
  11. Arrow, K. J. (1973): Higher Education as a Filter. Journal of Public Economics, vol. 2., no. 3., 193-216.
  12. Ashenfelter, O. – Mooney, J. D. (1968): Graduate education, ability, and earnings. Review of Economics & Statistics, vol. 50., no. 1., 78-86.
  13. Becker, G. S. (1964): Human Capital. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.
  14. Bedard, Kelly (2001): Human Capital Versus Signaling: University Access and High School Dropouts. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 109., no. 4., 749-775.
  15. Bitzan, J. D. (2009): Do sheepskin effects help explain racial earnings differences? Economics of Education Review, vol. 28., no. 6., 759–766.
  16. Boissiere, M. – Knight, J. B. – Sabot, R. H. (1985): Earnings, Schooling, Ability, and Cognitive Skills. The American Economic Review, vol. 75., no. 5., 1016-1030.
  17. Bol, T. – van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2011): Signals and closure by degrees: The education effect across 15 European countries. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, vol. 29., no. 1., 119-132.
  18. Brown, S. – Sessions, J. G, (1998). Education, Employment Status and Earnings: A Comparative Test of the Strong Screening Hypothesis, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, vol. 45., no. 5, 586-591.
  19. Brown, S. – Sessions, J. G. (1999): Education and employment status: a test of the strong screening hypothesis in Italy. Economics of Education Review, vol. 18., no. 4., 397-404.
  20. Brown, S. – Sessions, J. G. (2004): Signalling and screening. In: Geraint, Johnes – Johnes, Jill (eds.): International Handbook ont he Education of Economics. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham – Northampton,58-100.
  21. Chamberlain, G. – Griliches, Z. (1975): Unobservables with a Variance-Components Structure: Ability, Schooling, and the Economic Success of Brothers. International Economic Review, vol. 16., no. 2., 422-449.
  22. Chatterji, M. – Seaman, P. T. – Singell, Larry D. Jr. (2003): A test of sinalling hypothesis. Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 55. no. 2., 191-215.
  23. Chevalier, A. – Harmon, C. – Walker, I. – Zhu, Y. (2004): Does Education Raise Productivity, or Just Reflect it? Economic Journal, vol. 114., no. 499., F499-F517.
  24. Cohn, E. – Kiker, B. F. – Oliveira, M. M. De (1987): Further evidence on the screening hypothesis. Economics Letters, vol. 25., no. 3., 289-294.
  25. Clark, A. (2000): Signalling and Screening in a Transition Economy. Three Empirical Models Applied to Russia. Discussion Paper No. 2000/3, Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation, Riccarton, Edinburgh.
  26. Crespo, A. – Cortez, M. (2005): The Sheepskin Effects Evolution from 1982 to 2002 in Brazil: The roles of labor supply and demand changes. Conference paper, XXXIII Encontro Nacional De Economia, Anpec, www.anpec.org.br/encontro2005/artigos/A05A167.pdf, letöltés dátuma: 2008. 02. 28.
  27. Dolton, P. J. (1985): Signalling and screening in the graduate labour market. Hull economic research papers – No.134., University of Hull, Hull.
  28. Denny, K. J. – Harmon, C. P. (2001): Testing for Sheepskin Effects in Earnings Equations: Evidence for Five Countries. Applied Economics Letters. vol. 8., no. 9., 635-637.
  29. El-Hamidi, F. (2006): General or Vocational Schooling? Evidence on School Choice, Returns, and ‘Sheepskin’ Effects from Egypt 1998. Journal of Policy Reform. vol. 9., no. 2., 157-176.
  30. Ferrer, A. – Riddell, W. C. (2008): Education, Credentials, and Immigrant Earnings. The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d’Economique, vol. 41., no. 1., 186-216.
  31. Frazis, H. (1993): Selection bias and the degree effect. The Journal of Human Resources, vol. 28., no. 3., 538–554.
  32. Frazis, H. (2002): Human capital, signaling, and the pattern of returns to education. Oxford Economic Letters, vol. 54., no. 2., 298-320.
  33. Fredland, J. E. – Little, R. D. (1981): Self-Employed Workers: Returns to Education and Training. Economics of Education Review, vol. 1., no. 3., 315-337.
  34. Garen, J. (1984): The Returns to Schooling: A Selectivity Bias Approach with a Continuous Choice Variable. Econometrica, vol. 52., no. 5., 1199-1218.
  35. Gibson, J. (2000): Time or paper? A Direct Test for Sheepskin Effects in the Returns to Education. Working paper, www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/Departments/staff/johng/PDF_Files/WorkingPapers/OBESSheepskin.pdf, letöltés dátuma: 2009.01.23.
  36. Gömöri András (2001): Információ és interakció. Typotex Kiadó, Budapest.
  37. Groot, W. – Oosterbeek, H. (1994): Earnings Effects of Different Components of Schooling; Human Capital Versus Screening. The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 76., no. 2., 317-321.
  38. Grubb, W. N. (1993): Further Tests of Screening on Education and Observed Ability. Economics of Education Review, vol. 12., no. 2., 125-136.
  39. Gulasson, E. T. (1999): The Stability Pattern of Sheepskin Effects and Its Implications for the Human Capital Theory--Screening Hypothesis Debate. Eastern Economic Journal, vol. 25., no. 2., 141-150.
  40. Habermalz, S. (2006): More Detail on the Pattern of Returns to Educational Signals. Southern Economic Journal, vol. 73., no. 1., 125-135.
  41. Hämäläinen, U. – Uusitalo, R. (2006): Sorting Out The Sorting vs. Human Capital Debate. Conference paper, Cost Conference, London, www.tinbergen.nl/cost/london/uusitalo.pdf, letöltés dátuma: 2008.05.25.
  42. Hartog, J. (1983): To graduate or not: Does it matter? Economics Letters, vol. 12., no. 2., 193-199.
  43. Heywood, J. S. – Wei, X. (2004): Education and Signaling: Evidence from a Highly Competitive Labor Market. Education Economics, vol. 12., no. 1., 1-16.
  44. Hussey, A. (2012): Human Capital Augmentation versus the Signaling Value of MBA Education. Economics of Education Review, vol. 31., no. 4., 442-451.
  45. Hungerford, T. – Solon, G. (1987): Sheepskin Effects in the Returns to Education. The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 69., no. 1., 175-177.
  46. Jeager, D. A. – Page, M. E. (1996): Degrees Matter: New Evidence on Sheepskin Effects in the Returns to Education. Review of Economics & Statistics. vol. 78., no. 4., 733-740.
  47. Johnes, G. (1998): Human capital versus sorting: New data and a new test. Applied Economics Letters, vol. 5., no. 10., 665-667.
  48. Katz, E. – Ziderman, A. (1980): On education, screening and human capital. Economics Letters, vol. 6., no. 1., 81-88.
  49. Lambropoulos, H. S. (1992): Further Evidence on the Weak and Strong Versions of the Screening Hypothesis in Greece. Economics of Education Review, vol. 11., no. 1., 661-665.
  50. Lang, K. – Kropp, D. (1986): Human Capital versus Sorting: The Effect of Compulsory Attendance Law. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 101., no. 3., 609-624.
  51. Layard, R. – Psacharopoulos, G. (1974): The Screening Hypothesis and the Returns to Education. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 82., no. 5., 985-998.
  52. Lazear, E. P. (1977): Academic Achievement and Job Performance: Note. The American Economic Review, vol. 67., no. 2., 252-254.
  53. Lee, Y. L. – Miller, O. W. (2004): Screening and Human Capital in the Australian Labour Market of the 1990s. Australian Economic Papers, vol. 43., no. 2., 117-135.
  54. Liu, S.Y. – Buka, S.L. – Kubzansky, L.D. – Kawachi, I. – Gilman, S.E. – Loucks, E.B. (2013): Sheepskin effects of education in the 10-year Framingham risk of coronary heart disease. Social science & medicine (1982), vol. 80., no. 1., 31-36.
  55. López-Bazo, E, – Moreno, R. (2008): Does human capital stimulate investment in physical capital?: Evidence from a cost system framework. Economic Modelling, vol. 25., no. 6., November, 1295-1305.
  56. McGuinness, S. (2002): Graduate over-education as a sheepskin effect: evidence from Northern Ireland. Working Paper Series No. 70., Northern Ireland Economic Research Centre, Belfast.
  57. Miller, P. W. – Mulvey, C. – Martin, N. (2004): A test of the sorting model of education in Australia. Economics of Education Review, vol. 23., no. 5., 473-482.
  58. Miller, Paul W. – Volker, Paul A. (1984): The screening hypothesis: an application of the Wiles test., Economic Inquiry, vol. 22., 121-127.
  59. Oosterbeek, H. (1992): Study duration and earning. Economic Letters, vol. 40., no. 2., 223-228.
  60. Oosterbeek, H. (1993): Evidence on Screening: A Comment. Economics of Education Review, vol. 12., no. 1., 89-90.
  61. Park, J. H. (1999): Estimation of sheepskin effects using the old and new measures of educational attainment in the Current Population Survey. Economic Letters, vol. 62., no. 2., 237-240.
  62. Polónyi István (2002): Az oktatás gazdaságtana. Osiris Kiadó, Budapest.
  63. Psacharopoulos, George (1979): On the weak versus the strong version of the screening hypothesis. Economics Letters, vol. 4., no. 2., 181-185.
  64. Riley, J. G. (1975): Competitive signalling. Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 10., no. 2., 174-186.
  65. Riley, J. G. (1976): Information, screening and human capital. The American Economic Review, vol. 66., no. 2., 254-260.
  66. Riley, J. G. (1979): Testing the Educational Screening Hypothesis. The Journal of Political Economy, vol. 87., no. 5., pt. 2., 227-252.
  67. Riley, J. G. (2001): Silver Signals: Twenty-Five Years of Screening and Signaling. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 39., no. 2., 432-478.
  68. Ryan, C. A. (2001): Education: tests of whether it enhances productivity or merely conveys information on individual productivity in the labour market. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Melbourne Department of Economics, Melbourne.
  69. Schultz, T. W. (1961): Investment in Human Capital. The American Economic Review. vol. 51., no. 1., 1-17.
  70. Shah, A. (1985) Does education act as a screening device for certain British occupations?, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 37. no. 1., 118-134.
  71. Silles, M. (2008): Sheepskin Effects in the Returns to Education. Applied Economics Letters. vol. 15., no. 3., 217-219.
  72. Spence, M. A. (1973): Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 87., no. 3., 355-374.
  73. Spence, M. A. (1974): Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  74. Spence. M. A. (1981): Signaling, Screening and Information. In: Rosen, S. (ed.): Studies in Labor Markets, University of Chicago Press, Chicago-London, 21-64.
  75. Spence, M. A. (2002): Signaling in Retrospect and the Informational Structure of Markets. The American Economic Review, vol. 92., no. 3., 434-459.
  76. Stiglitz J. E. (1975): The Theory of ”Screening,” Education, and the Distribution of Income. The American Economic Review, vol. 65., no. 3., 283-300.
  77. Taubman, P. J. – Wales, T. J. (1973): Higher Education, Mental Ability, and Screening. The Journal of Political Economy, vol. 81., no. 1., 28-55.
  78. Tucker, I. B. (1985): Use of the decomposition technique to test the educational screening hypothesis. Economics of Education Review, vol. 4., no. 4., 321-326.
  79. Tucker, I. B. (1986): Evidence on the weak and the strong versions of the screening hypothesis in the United States. Economics Letters, vol. 21., no. 4., 391-394.
  80. Van der Meer, P. H. (2011): Educational credentials and external effects: A test for the Netherlands. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, vol. 29., no. 1., 107-118.
  81. Varian, H. R. (2005): Mikroökonómia középfokon. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
  82. Varga Júlia (1998): Oktatás-gazdaságtan. Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány, Budapest.
  83. Weiss, A. (1995): Human Capital vs. Signalling Explanations of Wages. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 9., no. 4., 133-154.
  84. Wiles, P. (1974): The Correlation between education and earnings: The External-Test-Not-Content hypothesis (ETNC). Higher Education, vol. 3., no. 1., 43-58.
  85. Willis, R. J. – Rosen, S. (1979): Education and Self-Selection. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 87., no. 5., S7-S36.
  86. Wolpin, K. I. (1977): Education and Screening. American Economic Review, vol. 67., no. 5., 949-958.
  87. Ziderman, A. (1992): Evidence on Screening: P Tests for Israel. Economics of Education Review, vol. 11., no. 1., 67-69.
Most read articles by the same author(s)