Search

Search Results

• CHILD CONCEPTION AND CHILDHOOD NARRATIVES IN THE LIGHT OF CRITICAL PEDAGOGY, CHILDHOOD SOCIOLOGY AND NARRATIVE PSYCHOLOGY

  41-52

  Renátó Támba

  Views:

  460

  In my thesis I attempt to define the basic concepts of the historical research of child conception and child perception, I try to emphasize the significance of narratives of childhood, and I point to the connection between the child conception, child perception, and the narratives. In the Hungarian pedagogical press, there aren’t yet carefully developed definitions, theoretical approaches regarding the researches of child conception and child perception, and that’s why we have to review that subject.  My study contains three main parts. In the first chapter I review the connections between the everyday pedagogical attitudes or perspectives and the child ideologies, then I analyze the relationship between the development-based pedagogy and the everyday pedagogical discourses, but I attempt to define the contemplative pedagogical attitude too. In chapter II I outline the concepts of child conception (child image) and child perception, and I point the relation between these concepts and the narratives of childhood. The last chapter is a summary with practical aspects, but I don’t show the paradigms of childhood history. In my theoretical overview, I try to answer that question: what kind of resources, components we can find in the different pedagogical views, and how to do these works under our researches. In my view, the child ideologies determine the pedagogical discourses of the different ages, and instead of the totalizing child conception of development-bases pedagogy we try to find new paradigms, e. g. the narrative psychology, the critical pedagogy and the new childhood-sociology, therefore these paradigms are more efficient for the child-rearing practices and our researches. Namely, we can’t vocalize the children’s perspective by the comparison to the adult gauge, therefore we prefer the contemplative, narrative methods, which leave open the frame of interpretation (reference).

• SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2015. Vol. 1. (3.)

  1-90

  Treatment Special

  Views:

  525

  Special Treatment, 2015. Vol. 1. (3.) - full text

• Special Treatment Interdisciplinary Journal, 2025.11(3)

  1-217

  Editoral Board of Special Treatment

  Views:

  268

  Journal of Special Treatment, 2025. Vol.11(2)-full text

• SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2020. Vol. 6. (4.) - FULL TEXT

  1-111

  Treatment Special

  Views:

  653

  Special Treatment, 2020. Vol. 6. (4.) - full text

• SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2022. Vol. 8. (3.)

  1-157

  Treatment Special

  Views:

  908

  Journal of Special Treatment, 2022. Vol. 8. (3.) - full text

• SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2018. Vol. 3. (1.)

  1-111

  Treatment Special

  Views:

  485

  Special Treatment, 2017. Vol. 3. (1.) - full text

• Special Treatment, 2024. Vol.10.(1)

  1-136

  Editorial Board of Special Treatment Journal

  Views:

  283

  Journal of Special Treatment, 2024.Vol.10.(1) - full text

• SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2019. Vol. 5. (2.)

  1-93

  Treatment Special

  Views:

  660

  Special Treatment, 2019. Vol. 5. (2.) - full text

• SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2015. Vol. 1. (2.)

  1-103

  Treatment Special

  Views:

  414

  Special Treatment, 2015. Vol. 1. (2.) - full text

• Special Treatment, 2025.11.(SI)

  1-231

  Editorial office of Special Treatment Journal

  Views:

  290

  Journal of Special Treatment, 2025.11.(SI) - full text

• SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2018. Vol. 4. (1.)

  1-91

  Treatment Special

  Views:

  495

  Special Treatment, 2018. Vol. 4. (1.) - full text

• SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2022. Vol. 8. (2.)

  1-167

  Special Treatment

  Views:

  534

  Journal of Special Treatment, 2022. Vol. 8. (2.) - full text

• Special Treatment Interdisciplinary Journal, 2026.12(2)

  1-137

  Special Treatment Journal

  Views:

  77

  Special Treatment Interdisciplinary Journal, 2026.12(2)-full text

• SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2017. Vol. 3. (2.)

  1-122

  Treatment Special

  Views:

  516

  Special Treatment, 2017. Vol. 3. (2.) - full text

• SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2023. Vol. 9. (4.)

  1-162

  Editoral Board of Special Treatment Journal

  Views:

  319

  Journal of Special Treatment, 2023. Vol. 9. (4.) - full text

• SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2019. Vol. 5. (4.)

  1-87

  Treatment Special

  Views:

  521

  Special Treatment, 2019. Vol. 5. (4.) - full text

• SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2016. Vol. 2. (1.)

  1-112

  Treatment Special

  Views:

  515

  Special Treatment, 2016. Vol. 2. (1.) - full text

• Special Treatment, 2025.11.(1.).

  1-131

  Editorial office of Special Treatment Journal

  Views:

  306

  Journal of Special Treatment, 2025.11.(1.) - full text

• SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2020. Vol. 6. (3.)

  1-119

  Treatment Special

  Views:

  709

  Special Treatment, 2020. Vol. 6. (3.) - full text

• SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2022. Vol. 8. (1.)

  1-140

  Journal of Special Treatment

  Views:

  438

  Journal of Special Treatment, 2022. Vol. 8. (1.) - full text

• Social Vulnerability in Post-Conflict Maluku, Indonesia: A Sociological Perspective

  79-89

  Nur Aida Kubangun

  Views:

  133

  The Maluku region constitutes one of Indonesia’s post-conflict areas that continues to experience long-term social consequences. The conflict not only resulted in physical destruction but also generated enduring social vulnerability manifested in fragmented social relations, weakened intergroup trust, and limited access to social and educational resources. This article aims to analysed the dynamics of post-conflict social vulnerability in Maluku from a sociological perspective, emphasizing how local communities interpret, experience, and respond to these conditions in their everyday social lives. The study employs a qualitative approach with a case study design, drawing on in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentation of community-based social and customary practices. Data were analysed through thematic and narrative approaches to capture the interconnections between conflict memory, social structure, and community-based recovery mechanisms. The findings indicate that post-conflict social vulnerability in Maluku is structural, relational, and historical in nature; however, it does not entirely incapacitate the community’s social capacity. Customary institutions and community relations play a significant role in rebuilding social cohesion, facilitating social inclusion, and transmitting intergenerational peace values. These findings underscore that post-conflict recovery does not rely solely on formal state interventions, but also on the strength of local social and cultural practices and historical consciousness. This study contributes to the development of post-conflict sociology and the sociology of social inclusion by highlighting the importance of community-based approaches in understanding and managing social vulnerability.

• SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2017. Vol. 3. (3.)

  1-113

  Treatment Special

  Views:

  436

  Special Treatment, 2017. Vol. 3. (3.) - full text

• SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2023. Vol. 9. (3.)

  1-168

  Treatment Journal Special

  Views:

  244

  Journal of Special Treatment, 2023. Vol. 9. (3.) - full text

• SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2019. Vol. 5. (3.)

  1-120

  Treatment Special

  Views:

  530

  Special Treatment, 2019. Vol. 5. (3.) - full text

   

• SPECIAL TREATMENT, 2018. Vol. 2. (2.)

  1-110

  Treatment Special

  Views:

  490

  Special Treatment, 2016. Vol. 2. (2.) - full text