dEjournals Home Page
Competitio
Online ready Current Most Read Archives Search
Register Login

Competitio

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2012)
Papers

Deep vs. Shallow Integration. The Case of NAFTA and Mercosur

Published:
2012-06-18
DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2012/1/5
Authors
Diana Balkay,
Laszlo Erdey
View
PDF (Hungarian)
Keywords
intra-industry trade regional integrations Mercosur NAFTA
How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Balkay, D., & Erdey, L. (2012). Deep vs. Shallow Integration. The Case of NAFTA and Mercosur. Competitio, 11(1), 68-82. https://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2012/1/5
Abstract

Integration processes began in the 1960s and have become increasingly intense, bringing with them a growing share of intra-industry trade flows in international trade. According to the Smooth Adjustment Hypothesis (SAH), trade between similar industries or products results in lower adjustment costs in the factor markets. Due to the liberalizing effect of trade integrations trade flows intensify, causing an increase in intra-industry trade flows and consequently a decrease in adjustment costs at the same time. The alteration of trade patterns can be caused by changes both in quantity and in quality. Analyzing these effects separately allows us to better understand the trade policy practices of the chosen countries and to provide the decision makers with information.
In this paper we analyze NAFTA and Mercosur, two integrations which differ both in factor endowments and in depth of integration (deep vs. shallow). We used SITC Rev. 1 AG3 (industrial level) and HS92 AG6 (product level) bilateral trade data from the UN COMTRADE database to analyze the evolution of intra-industry trade flows.

Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) classifications: F13, F14, F15

References
  1. Alesina, A. – Barro, R. J. – Tenreyro, S. (2002): Optimal Currency Areas. NBER Working Paper 9072.
  2. Baier, S. L. – Bergstrand, J. H. (2007): Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade? Journal of International Economics, Vol. 71:172–195.
  3. Behar, A. – Crivillé, L. C. i (2011): Does It Matter Who You Sign With? Comparing the Impacts of North-South and South-South Trade Agreements on Bilateral Trade. Policy Research Working Paper 5626, The World Bank, április.
  4. Brülhart, M. (1994): Marginal intra-industry trade: measurement and relevance for the pattern of industrial adjustment. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 130, 3:600–613.
  5. Brülhart, M. – Thorpe, M.(2000): Intra-industry trade and adjustment in Malaysia: puzzling evidence. Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 7, 729-733
  6. Duran, J.– Mulder, N.– Onodera, O. (2008): Trade Liberalisation and Economic Performance: Latin America versus East Asia 1970-2006. OECD Trade Policy Working Papers No.70, OECD Publishing.
  7. CEPAL (2001): Latin America and the Caribbean in the World Economy, 1999-2000. LC/G.2085-P, július, Santiago de Chile.
  8. Comtrade (2011): UN Comtrade Database, DESA/UNSD.
  9. Erdey László (2004): Az ágazaton belüli kereskedelem hatása az alkalmazkodási költségekre és a konjuktúraciklusok szinkronizációjára. Competitio, 3. évf., 3:61–82.
  10. Erdey László (2005): Hagyományos módszerek és új kihívások az ágazaton belüli kereskedelem mérésében. Statisztikai Szemle, 83. évf., 3:258–283.
  11. Erlat, G. – Erlat, H. (2006): Intraindustry Trade and Labour Market Adjustment in Turkey. Another Piece of Puzzling Evidence? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 42, 5:5–27.
  12. Evans, D. – Gasiorek, M. – Ghoneim, A. – Haynes-Prempeh, M. – Holmes, P. – Iacovone, L. – Jackson, K. – Iwanow, T. – Robinson, S. – Rollo, J. (2006): Assessing Regional Trade Agreements with Developing Countries: Shallow and Deep Integration, Trade, Productivity, and Economic Performance. University of
  13. Sussex, DFID Project No. 04 5881.
  14. Faustino, H. C. (2010): Intra-Industry Trade and Labour Market Adjustment in the Automobile Industry. International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol 2, 4:3–6.
  15. Fertő Imre. (2009): Labour Market Adjustment and Intra-Industry Trade: The effects of Association on the Hungarian Food Industry. Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 60, 3:668–681.
  16. Fertő Imre – Soós Károly Attila (2010): Marginal intra-industry trade and adjustment costs in the first phase of transition. A Hungarian-Poilsh comparison. Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 37, 5:495–504.
  17. Fontagné, L. – Freudenberg, M. (1997): Intra-Industry Trade Methodological Issues Reconsidered. CEPII document de travail, WP97-01. sz., Centre d’Etudes Prospectives et d’Informations Internationales, Párizs.
  18. Fontagné, L. – Freudenberg, M. – Gaulier, G. (2006): A Systematic Decomposition of World Trade into Horizontal and Vertical IIT. Review of World Economics, Vol. 142, 3:459–475.
  19. Frankel, J. – Stein. E. – Wei, S.-J. (1995): Trading blocs and the Americas: the natural, the unnatural, and the super-natural. Journal of Developmental Economics, Vol. 47, 1:61–95.
  20. Ghoneim, A. F. – Gonzalez, J. L. – Parra, M. M. – Péridy, N. (2011): Shallow versus Deep Integration between Mediterranean Countries and the WU within the Mediterranean Region. CASE Network Reports, No. 96.
  21. Grubel, H. G. – Lloyd, P. J. (1975): Intra-Industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products. Macmillan Press, London.
  22. Hoekman, B. (1998): Free Trade and Deep Integration. Antidumping and Antitrust in Regional Agreements. World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 1950.
  23. Hoekman, B. – Konan, D. E. (1999): Deep Integration, Nondiscrimination, and Euro-Mediterranean Free Trade. World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 2130.
  24. Hufbauer, G. C. – Chilas, J. (1974): Specialization by Industrial Countries: Extent and Consequences. Megjelent: Giersch, H. (szerk.): The International Division of Labour: Problems and Perspectives. Tubingen: J.C.B. Mohr:3–38.
  25. Lawrence, R. Z. (1996): Regionalism, Multilateralism, and Deeper Integration. The Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.
  26. Leitão, N. C. (2011): Intra-industry Trade, Knowledge and Adjustment Costs. Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 11, 14:2652–2656.
  27. Thorpe, M. – Leitão, N. C. (2012): Marginal Intra-Industry Trade and Adjustment Costs: The Australian Experience. Economic Papers, Vol. 31, 1:123–131.
  28. Lipson, C. (1982): The Transformation of Trade: the Sources and Effects of Regime Change. International Organisation, 36. évf. 2: 417-455.
  29. Marvel, H. P.– Ray, E. J. (1987): Intraindustry Trade: Sources and Effects on Protection. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 95, 6:1278–1291.
  30. NAFTA Secretariat (2012), http://www.nafta-sec-alena.org Letöltve: 2012.04.16.
  31. Shelburne, R. C. (1993): Changing trade patterns and the intra-industry trade index: A note. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 129, 4:829–833.
  32. Stiglitz, J. E. (1987): The causes and consequences of the dependence of quality on price. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 25, 1:1–48.
  33. World Bank (2012), http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL Letöltve: 2012.04.16.
  34. WTO (2011): International Trade Statistics 2011. WTO Publications, Genf.
  35. Zahniser, S. – Roe, A. (2011): NAFTA at 17: Full Implementation Leads to Increased Trade and Integration. WRS.11-01, USDA, Economic Research Service, március.
Most read articles by the same author(s)