dEjournals Home Page
Economica
Opening page Current First online
Archives Search
Register Login

Economica

Vol. 13 No. 1-2 (2022)
Articles

GONDOLATOK FENNTARTHATÓSÁGI SZÁMVITELRŐL ÉS TÁRSADALMI FENNTARTHATÓSÁGRÓL

Published:
2022-06-30
DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.47282/economica/2022/13/1-2/11084
Authors
Norbert György Gácsér,
Károly Szóka
View
pdf (Hungarian)
Keywords
Equal Opportunities Matthew principle Social Sustainability Sustainability Accounting
How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Gácsér, N. G., & Szóka, K. (2022). GONDOLATOK FENNTARTHATÓSÁGI SZÁMVITELRŐL ÉS TÁRSADALMI FENNTARTHATÓSÁGRÓL. Economica, 13(1-2). https://doi.org/10.47282/economica/2022/13/1-2/11084
Abstract

The political prominence of sustainability and the scientific prominence of sustainability accounting go back nearly 40 years. While initially providing sustainable operations (at the corporate, state, and global levels) was just an opportunity, nowadays more and more binding laws are issued both from individual nations and communities of nations, forcing citizens and business organizations to take action in this direction. This article goes one step back and seeks to illustrate some contradictions, problems and limitations inherent in basic contexts. After the general presentation of the topic, the focus of this study shifts to the aspect of social sustainability, and within it to the question of equality.

References
  1. Agudelo, M.A.; Johannsdottir, L.; Davidsdottir, B. (2019): A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, 4, pp. 1-23.
  2. Arneson, R. (2008): Equality of Opportunity. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2015 Edition), [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/equal-opportunity/ [Megtekintés: 18-May-2022].
  3. Barry, B. (1989): Theories of justice. London, Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
  4. Boyer, R.; Peterson, N.; Arora, P.; Caldwell, K. (2016): Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward. SUSTAINABILITY, 8(9), p. 878.
  5. Brundtland Bizottság (1988): Közös jövőnk. A Brundtland-jelentés. Mezőgazdasági Könyvkiadó. Budapest.
  6. Burawoy, M (1998): The Extended Case Method. SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY 16(1), pp. 4–33.
  7. Dempsey, N.; Bramley, G.; Power, S.; Brown, C. (2011): The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development: Defining Urban Social Sustainability. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 19, pp. 289–300.
  8. Deutsch, M. (1975): Equity, equality and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 31, pp. 137–149.
  9. Eizenberg E.; Jabareen Y. (2017): Social Sustainability: A New Conceptual Framework. SUSTAINABILITY 2017, 9, 68.
  10. Elkington, J. (1999): Enter the tripple bottom line. Springer.
  11. Fernández-Villaverde J.; Mandelman F.; Yu Y.; Zanetti F. (2021): THE “Matthew effect” and market concentration: search complementarities and monopsony power. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of ATLANTA WORKING PAPER SERIES 2021-4.
  12. Filho, W. L. (2020): Discover Sustainability: a new Journal for the Rapid Dissemination of Sustainability Research. DISCOVER SUSTAINABILITY 1(1):1. DOI:10.1007/s43621-020-00001-y
  13. Getzner, M. (1999): Weak and strong sustainability indicators and regional environmental resources. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND HEALTH, 10(3), pp. 170–177.
  14. Gladwell, M. (2008): Outliers: The Story of Success (1 ed.). Little, Brown and Company. ISBN 978-0-316-01792-3.
  15. Gomberg, P. (2007): How To Make Opportunity Equal: Race And Contributive Justice. Blackwell.
  16. Gray, R. (1994): Corporate Reporting for Sustainable Development: Accounting for Sustainability in 2000AD. ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES. 3 (1): pp. 17–45.
  17. Green S. J. D. (1989): Competitive Equality of Opportunity: A defense. Ethics 100., pp. 5-32.
  18. Gyulai, I. (2013): Fenntartható fejlődés és fenntartható növekedés. STATISZTIKAI SZEMLE, 91. évf. 8-9. szám.
  19. Hale, J.; Legun, K.; Campbell, H.; Carolan, M. (2019): Social sustainability indicators as performance. Geoforum.
  20. Hasna, A. M. (2007): Contemporary Society, Technology and Sustainability. The International Journal of Technology, KNOWLEDGE AND SOCIETY. Vol. 5. Issue 1. pp 13–20.
  21. Lamberton, G. (2005): Sustainability accounting — a brief history and conceptual framework. ACCOUNTING FORUM 29 (2005) pp. 7–26. Elsevier.
  22. Littig, B.; Grießler, E. (2005): Social sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. 2005, 8, pp. 65–79.
  23. McGuinn, J.; Fries-Tersch, E.; Jones M.; Crepaldi, C.; Masso, M.; Kadarik, I.; Samek, L. M.; Drufuca, S.; Gancheva, M.; Geny. B. (2020): Social Sustainability Concepts and Benchmarks. Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, Directorate-General for Internal Policies. PE 648.782.
  24. Missimer, M.; Mesquiata P. L. (2015): Social Sustainability within the Framework for Strategic Sustainable Development; Blekinge Institute of Technology: Kalrskrona.
  25. Merton, R. K. (1968): The Matthew Effect in Science. SCIENCE. 159 (3810): 56–63.
  26. Petera, P.; Wagner, J. (2015): Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and its Reflections in the Literature. EUROPEAN FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING JOURNAL, 2015, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 13-32.
  27. Sander, R. W. van Hees (2014): Sustainable Development in the EU: Redefining and Operationalizing the Concept. UTRECHT LAW REVIEW. Volume 10, Issue 2.
  28. Scoones, I. (2016): The Politics of Sustainability and Development. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES 41(1), pp. 293–319.
  29. Szóka, K.; Gácsér, N. G. (2021): Sustainability accounting - historical development and future perspectives of the discipline. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 14(1), 1–4. http://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1475.
  30. Szóka, K. (2022): Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in the Post-COVID Times. In 6th FEB International Scientific Conference (pp. 145–154). http://doi.org/10.18690/um.epf.5.2022.14.
  31. Taiwo M. O.; Samsudin S.; Daud D. Z.; Ataguba O.J.; Atamamen F. O. (2020): Review Of The Current Concepts, Dimensions, Elements And Indicators Of Social Sustainability And Social Development. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR & CLINICAL MEDICINE. Volume 7, Issue 8.
  32. Tang, M.; Liao, H.; Wan, Z.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Rosen, M. A. (2018): Ten Years of Sustainability (2009 to 2018): A Bibliometric Overview. SUSTAINABILITY 2018, 10, 1655.
  33. Vallance, S.; Perkins, H. C.; Dixon, J. E. (2011):‘What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. GEOFORUM, 42(3), pp. 342–348.
  34. Wade, R. H. (2001): The rising inequality of world income distribution. Finance & Development, 2001 December. IMF
  35. Wade, R. H. (2004): On the causes of increasing world poverty and inequality, or why the Matthew effect prevails. NEW POLITICAL ECONOMY, Vol. 9., 2004 Issue 2., pp. 163-188.
  36. Weiss, C. H. (1979): The Many Meanings of Research Utilization. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 39(5), pp. 426–431.
  37. Woodcraft, S.; Bacon, N.; Hackett, T.; Caistor-Arendar, L.; Hall, F. (2012): Design for Social Sustainability: A framework for creating thriving new communities. Social Life: London, UK.
Most read articles by the same author(s)