Keresés
Keresési eredmények
-
Az orosz tőkeexport és az eklektikus paradigma jövője: Mi változik a 2008–2009. évi válság után?
31-54Megtekintések száma:201This article explores the future of Russian outward foreign direct investment in the aftermath of the crisis of 2008–2009. As it is too early to analyse the full impact of the crisis, it develops hypotheses about the degree of slowdown in the foreign expansion of Russian transnational corporations. It uses an extension of the eclectic paradigm to home country advantages (competitive environment, business environment, development strategy, State involvement) applied to a comparison of the Russian Federation with other economies in transition as an analytical tool. Systematic differences between transnationals from the Russian Federation (global firms, based on natural resources, aiming for vertical integration of assets) and from new European Union member countries (regional firms, based on downstream activities or services, aiming for horizontal integration) allow us to formulate more solid conclusions about the future of the Russian firms facing lower export prices, lower market capitalizations and higher debts. In turn, this article argue that a comparison with the large emerging economies of Brazil, China and India, under the acronym of BRIC can be less useful in the current context, as these economies are significantly less affected by the crisis of 2008–2009 than the Russian Federation; hence they can not expect a slowdown in their outward foreign direct investment similar to that of Russian transnationals.
JEL: F23; F21; O52; P29
-
Political Economy of Fiscal Reform in Central and Eastern Europe
66-75Megtekintések száma:100The reform of public finances has been at the centre of the post-socialist transition of Central and Eastern Europe since the early 1990s. At various stages of the transition, the reform process encompassed the entire gamut of public finances: the national budget, sub-national finances, extrabudgetary operations, and state-owned financial and non-financial enterprises. For the most part, fiscal reform was a non-linear stop-and-go process – often characterised by backtracking as well – and was uneven across countries. Moreover, unlike most reform experience in the rest of the world, fiscal reform in this region took place against the backdrop of a radical break, as sovereign countries emerged from a colonial past following the collapse of the Soviet Union. An important milestone was reached in 2004–2007, when all ten countries covered in this article became members of the European Union. The purpose of this article is to discuss fiscal reform in Central and Eastern Europe from the perspective of political economy. Following an overview of basic reform trends, the article focuses on the principal drivers and impediments to reform in the region. To conclude, the ingredients of successful reform are examined. The article does not provide an exhaustive inventory of reform measures, nor does it offer a survey of broad political economy issues prior to or during the transition period. Country references are intended to serve as stylised illustrations of main points, rather than as a comprehensive documentation of reform episodes.
Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) classifications: H1, H3, P2, P52.
-
Varieties of development paths in post communist countries with special regard to the transition in Hungary
5-25Megtekintések száma:175Transition in Central and Eastern Europe was carried out in various ways. However, the different countries’ current economic structure, institutions and main economic performance measures are rather similar. The question asked is whether these countries follow a specific kind of development model? What seems likely is that they differ substantially from CIS countries in many aspects. But they also seem to differ from existing models of capitalism more than they do from each-other. Based on this information, the varieties of capitalism literature assumes that such a model does indeed exist. However, no comprehensive positive description of the model has so far been provided. This paper tries to define the main elements of the CEE capitalist models. These are small open economies, with close integration into the world economy through foreign investments, a relatively limited and declining role of state redistribution, the problems of dual economic structure and insufficient job creation, a relatively large shadow economy and “business capture”-type cronyism. Further research is required to properly describe the elements and interactions among them.
Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) classifications: D72, E65, P31
-
Politikai költségvetési ciklusok: fiskális ciklushatások az állami kiadásokban Lengyelországban
47-62Megtekintések száma:143A tanulmány a fiskális ciklusok jelenlétét vizsgálja az államháztartási egyenlegek alakulásában Lengyelországban, 1989 és 2011 között. Összességében a legutóbbi kutatások eredményei azt mutatják, hogy a politikai költségvetési ciklusok (PBC) jelensége inkább a kevés demokratikus tapasztalattal rendelkező új demokráciákra jellemző, mint amilyenek például a posztszocialista tranzíciós országok. Mindazonáltal,
a ciklusok idővel eltűnnek, ahogy a választópolgárok kiismerik a demokratikus intézmények működését és a politikai manipulációt. Ezt az elméletet azonban Lengyelország mintáját vizsgálva nem tudtuk
empirikusan megerősíteni – sem a teljes államháztartási egyenlegben, sem az állami kiadásokban. Bár az 1997-es és a 2001-es választási mintában azonosítottunk fiskális ciklushatásokat a nyugdíjak és közszféra bérei terén, ezek átmeneti jellegűek voltak, s pozitív szavazatvásárlási hatásukat sokszor egyéb tényezők, intézkedések mérsékelték. Összességében a lengyel költségvetési egyenleg ciklikus mozgását – különösen a kilencvenes években – jellemzően nem a PBC okozta.Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kódok: D72, E62, H3
-
Institutional diversity and economic performance
Megtekintések száma:102Definition and role of institutions. Institutions are diverse: examples from OECD countries. Does institutional diversity matter for comparative economic performance? The problem of measurement. Do institutions tend to converge or diversify further? What are the driving forces? What did we learn from institution building in transition economies? Need for a better understanding of interactions between institutions and policies. The OECD work and
experience. Conclusion: the need for a vision.