dEjournals Home Page
Competitio
Online ready Current Most Read Archives Search
Register Login

Competitio

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2011)
Papers

A munkaerő-piaci intézmények hatásai a foglalkoztatásra szektorális megközelítésben

Published:
2020-08-31
DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2011/2/2
Author
Domician Mate
View
PDF (Hungarian)
Keywords
employment sectoral approach labor intstitutions
How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Mate, D. (2020). A munkaerő-piaci intézmények hatásai a foglalkoztatásra szektorális megközelítésben. Competitio, 10(2), 27-41. https://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2011/2/2
Abstract

Recently, there have been serious debates attempting to explain the role of institutions and their interactions as they might influence the impact of economic growth on employment. However, essentially no clear theoretical consensus has yet emerged and several unanswered problems remain. From this point of view, one interesting question is how institutions matter, and also what kind of characteristics they should have in economies. In our estimations ws followed a sectoral approach to identify the main features of institutions. In order to demonstrate short and lon run economic processes we use an error-correction method to analyze how certain intitutions and their interactions determine employment growth in different market-and non-market oriented branches. All in all, we demonstrate that unions, minimum wages and unemployment benefits have influenced employment in different ways.

JEL classification: J21, J45, E02.

References
  1. AOKI, M. [2007]: Endogenizing Institutions and Institutional Change. Journal of Institutional Economics Vol. 3.No. 1. pp. 1–31.
  2. ARPAIA, A. – MOURRE, G. [2005]: Labour Market Institutions and Labour Market Performance: A Survey of the Literature, OECD Economic Papers. No. 238.
  3. BELOT, M. – van Ours, J. C. [2004]: Does the Recent Success of Some OECD Countries in Lowering Their Unemployment Rates Lie in the Clever Design of their Labour Market Reforms?, Oxford Economic Papers,Vol. 56. No. 4. pp. 621–642.
  4. BERTOLA, G. [2004]: A Pure Theory of Job Security and Labour Income Risk, Review of Economic Studies,Vol. 71., pp 43–61.
  5. BLANCHARD, O. [2005]: European Unemployment: the Evolution of Facts and Ideas, Economic Policy, Vol.21. No. 45. pp. 5–59.
  6. BLANCHARD, O. – WOLFERS, J. [2000]: The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of the European Unemployment: The Aggregate Evidence, NBER Working Papers 7282.
  7. BOERI, T. – van OURS, J. [2008]: The Economics of Imperfect Labor Markets, Princeton Press. New Yersey.
  8. BOETTKE, P. J. – COYNE, C. J. – LEESON, P. T. [2008]: Institutional Stickiness and the New Development Economics. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol 67. No 2. pp. 331–358.
  9. BOOTH, A. L. [1995]: Economics of Trade Unions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  10. BORLAND, J. – GREGORY, R. [1999]: Recent Developments in Public Sector Labor Markets, in Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol 3c., Chap 48. pp. 3573–3660. Elsevier.
  11. CAHUC, P. – ZYLBERBERG, A. [2010]: Labor Economics, Cambridge MIT Press, London.
  12. DiNARDO, J. – FORTIN, N. M. – LEMIEUX, T. [1995]: Labor Market Institutions and the Distribution of Wages, 1973-1992: A Semiparametric Approach, Econometrica, Vol. 64. pp. 1001-1044.
  13. DOLADO, J. – KRAMARZ, F. – MACHIN, S. – MANNING. A. – MARGOLIS, D. – TEULINGS, C. [1996]:The Economic Impact of Minimum Wages in Europe, Economic Policy, October. pp. 319-372.
  14. DUNLOP, J. T. [1944]: Wage Determination under Trade Unions, MacMillen.
  15. EBBINGHAUS, B. – VISSER. J [2000]: Trade Unions in Western Europe since 1945. Palgrave-Macmillan.
  16. EC [2011]: EU (KLEMS) Growth and Productivity Accounts Database, Utoljára letöltve: 2011.06.01http://www.euklems.net/
  17. ELMESKOV, J. – MARTIN, J. P. – SCARPETTA, S. [1998]: Key lessons for Labour Market Reforms: Evidence from OECD Experiences, Swedish Economic Policy Review, Vol. 5.
  18. FITOUSSI, J. P. – JESTAZ, D. – PHELPS, D. – ZOEGA, E. S. [2000]: Roots of the Recent Recoveries: Labor Reforms or Private-Sector Forces?, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 1. pp. 237–312.
  19. KAITZ, H. [1970]: Experience of the Past: The National Minimum in Youth Unemployment and Minimum Wages, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bulletin I657, pp. 30–54.
  20. LAYARD, D. R. – NICKELL, S. [1999]: Labor Market Institutions and Economic Performance. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3. pp. 3029–3081.
  21. LAYARD, D. R. – NICKELL, S. [1990]: Is Unemployment Lower if Unions Bargain over Employment?, TheQuarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 105. No. 3. pp. 773–787.
  22. –––––––––––––––––––––––––– [1999]: Labor Market Institutions and Economic Performance. Handbook ofLabor Economics, Vol. 3. pp. 3029–3081.
  23. McDONALD, I. M. – SOLOW, R. M. [1981]: Wage Bargaining and Employment, The American Economic Review, Vol. 71. No. 5. pp. 896-908.
  24. MOURRE, G. [2006]: Did the Pattern of Aggregate Employment Growth Changed in the Euro Area in Recent Years?, Applied Economics, Vol. 38. No. 15. pp. 1783–1807.
  25. NICKELL, S. L. – OCHEL, W. N. – QUINTINI, G. [2003]: The Beveridge Curve, Unemployment and Wagesin the OECD from the 1960s to the 1990s, CEP Discussion Papers No. 0502.
  26. NICKELL, S. L. – NUNZIATA, L. – QUINTINI, G. [2005]: Unemployment in the OECD since the 1960s. What do we Know?, The Economic Journal Vol. 115. pp. 1–27.
  27. NORTH, D. C. [1992]: Institutions, Ideology and Economic Performance. CATO Journal Vol. 11. No. 3.
  28. OAXACA, R. [1973]: Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets, International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Socialand Economic Research Association, Vol. 14. No. 3. pp. 693-709.
  29. OECD [2006]: OECD Employment Outlook, OECD, Paris.
  30. OSWALD, A. J. [1993]: Efficient Contracts are on the Labour Demand Curve: Theory and Facts, Labour Economics, Elsevier, Vol. 1. No. 1. pp. 85–113.
  31. RAMANATHAN, R. [2005]: Bevezetés az ökonometria használatába, Panem Kiadó.
  32. STIGLER, G. [1946]: Economics of Minimum Wage Legislation, American Economic Review, Vol. 36. pp.535–543
Most read articles by the same author(s)