Papers

Transaction costs in the standardization of mobile telephone systems. The case of Japanese mobile standards

Published:
2012-06-18
Author
View
Keywords
How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Kovacs, I. (2012). Transaction costs in the standardization of mobile telephone systems. The case of Japanese mobile standards. Competitio, 11(1), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2012/1/6
Abstract

Although there have been papers concerned with the connection between standardization and transaction costs, they have analyzed how standards decrease transaction costs. This paper shows that transaction costs emerge during the standardization process. If the creation of a standard is seen as a transaction, in which the parties exchange their explicit and implicit knowledge, standardization can be analyzed from the viewpoint of Transaction Costs Economics. Undoubtedly the knowledge of the parties is a specific asset, exchange of which causes significant transaction costs; therefore opportunism plays a crucial role
during standardization. In this paper I show that the standardization of mobile phone systems can be analyzed in the framework set up by Teece (1986) in order to point out how transaction costs could be decreased in particular cases. The standardization of second generation mobile systems in Japan illustrates the statements made in the theoretical part of the paper.

Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) classifications: D23, O31, L96

References
  1. Abbott, K. W. – Snidal, D. (2001): International ‘Standards’ and International Governance. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 8, No. 3:345–370.
  2. Abernathy, W. J. – Utterback, J. (1978): Patterns of Industrial Innovation. Technology Review, Vol. 80, No. 7:40–47.
  3. Alchian, A. A. – Woodward, S. (1988): Review of Williamson’s “The Economic Institutions of Capitalism”. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 26:65–79.
  4. Ancori, B. – Bureth, A. – Cohendet, P. (2000): The Economics of Knowledge: The Debate about Codification and Tacit Knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 9, No. 2:255–287.
  5. Anderson, P. – Tushman, M. L. (1990): Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 4:604–633.
  6. Auckerman, W. (1997): Form Over Substance: Japan’s Telecommunications Deregulation Debate. Computing Japan. http://www.japaninc.com/cpj/magazine/issues/1997/jun97/0697wcyberjap.html
  7. Barnes, S. J. (2002): The Mobile Commerce Value Chain: Analysis and Future Developments. International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 22:91–108.
  8. Beck, J. C. – Wade, M. (2003): DoCoMo: Japan’s Wireless Tsunami. AMACOM, New York.
  9. Brunsson, N. – Jacobsson, B. (szerk.) (2000): A World of Standards. Oxford University Press.
  10. Camponovo, G. – Pigneur, Y. (2003): Analyzing the m-Business Landscape. Annales des telecommunications, Vol. 58, No. 1–2:59–77.
  11. Funk, J. L. (1998): Competition between Regional Standards and the Success and Failure of Firms in the World-Wide Mobile Communication Market. Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 22, No. 4–5:419–441.
  12. Funk, J. L. (2003): Standards, Dominant Designs and Preferential Acquisition of Complementary Assets through Slight Information Advantages. Research Policy, Vol. 32:1325–1341.
  13. Funk, J.L. (2006): Mobile Phone Industry: A Microcosm of Deregulation, Globalization, and Technological Change in the Japanese Economy. In: Taplin, R. (ed.) (2006): Japanese Telecommunications Market and Policy in Transition, Routledge, London
  14. Funk, J. L. – Methe, D. T. (2001): Market and Committee Based Mechanisms in the Creation and Diffusion of Global Industry Standards: The Case of Mobile Communication. Research Policy, Vol. 30:589–610.
  15. Johnson, B. – Lorenz, E. – Lundwall, B-A. (2001): Why all this Fuss about Codified and Tacit Knowledge? Industrial and Corporation Change, Vol. 11, No. 2:245–262.
  16. Kapás, Judit (1999): A vállalat tudása. Vezetéstudomány, 30. évf., 6. szám:2–11.
  17. Klein, B. – Crawford, R. G. – Alchian, A. A. (1978): Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process. Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 21, No. 2:297–326.
  18. Krafft, J. (2010): Profiting in the Info-Coms Industry in the Age of Broadband: Lessons and New Considerations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 77:265–278.
  19. Lyytinen, K. – Fomin, V. V. (2002): Achieving High Momentum in the Evolution of Wireless Infrastructures: The Battle over the 1G Solutions. Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 26, No. 3–4:149–170.
  20. MacDonald, D. J. (2003): NTT DoCoMo’s i-mode: Developing Win-Win Relationships for Mobile Commerce. In: Mennecke, B. E. – Strader, T. J. (szerk.) (2003): Mobile Commerce: Technology, Theory and Applications. IDEA Group Publishing, London:1–25.
  21. Maitland, C. F. – Bauer, J. M. – Westerveld, R. (2002): The European Market for Mobile Data: Evolving Value Chains and Industry Structures. Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 26:485–504.
  22. Malerba, F. – Orsenigo, L. (2000): Knowledge, Innovative Activities and Industrial Evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 9, No. 2:289–314.
  23. Manninen, A. T. (2002): Elaboration of NMT and GSM Standards: From Idea to Market. Studia Historica Jyväskylänsia. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
  24. Nelson, R. R. – Winter, S. (1982): An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
  25. Nonaka, I. (1994): A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, Vol. 5, No. 1:14–37.
  26. Pavitt, K. (1984): Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory. Research Policy, Vol. 13:343–373.
  27. Peltokorpi, V. – Nonaka, I. – Kodama, M. (2007): NTT DoCoMo’s Launch of I-Mode in the Japanese Mobile Phone Market: A Knowledge Creation Perspective. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 44, No. 1:50–72.
  28. Polányi, M. (1966): The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday & Company Inc., Garden City, New York.
  29. Steinbock, D. (2003): Globalization of Wireless Value System: From Geographic to Strategic Advantages. Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 27:207–235.
  30. Steinmueller, W. E. (2000): Will New Information and Communication Technologies Improve the ’Codification’ of Knowledge? Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 9., No. 2:361–376.
  31. Suárez, F. F (2004): Battles for Technological Dominance: An Integrative Framework. Research Policy, Vol. 33:271–286.
  32. Suárez, F. F. – Utterback, J. M. (1991): Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms. Sloan Working Paper No. 3340–91, MIT.
  33. Teece, D. J. (1986): Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy. Research Policy, Vol. 15, No. 6:285–305.
  34. Tushman, M. L. – Anderson, P. (1986): Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 3:439–465.
  35. Vesa, J. (2003): The Impact of Industry Structure, Product Architecture, and Ecosystems on the Success of Mobile Data Services: A Comparison between European and Japanese Markets. ITS 14th European Regional Conference, Helsinki, August 23–24, 2003.
  36. West, J. (2000): Institutional Constraints in the Initial Deployment of Cellular Telephone Service on Three Continents. In: Jakobs, K. (szerk.) (2000): Information Technology Standards and Standardization: A Global Perspective, Idea Group, Philadelphia.