The role of higher education socialization in shaping students' future-oriented work ethic
https://doi.org/10.37441/cejer/2026/8/1/17152
Authors
View
Keywords
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How To Cite
Abstract
Research on higher education clearly indicates that the institutional environment, as well as the relationships formed with faculty and peers, not only influence academic achievement and the risk of dropout, but also have a significant long-term effect on students' life trajectories, future outlook, future orientation, and even their decisions to remain in a given geographic location (Pusztai, 2011; Bess & Dee, 2012; Sütő, 2021; Sütő, 2025; Demeter-Karászi, 2025). This suggests that higher education institutions do not operate merely as knowledge-transfer organizations, but also as socializing environments that shape students' relationship with work, achievement, and long-term goals. The theoretical framework of our research is therefore grounded in approaches that interpret future-oriented work ethic not exclusively as an individual psychological trait, but as a phenomenon embedded in social relationships and institutional contexts (Berger, 2001; Kuh & Umbach, 2004). Our research seeks to answer what associations can be identified between the characteristics of the social and institutional environment of higher education institutions — in particular, institutional culture, relationships with faculty and peers, and institutional trust — and students' future-oriented work ethic. Our empirical data are drawn from the 2023–2024 survey of the MTA–DE Public Education Development Research Program, a large-scale international database comprising 1,336 respondents. The results indicate that trust-based relationships with both faculty and peers, as well as the perception of a transparent and fair institutional atmosphere, are significantly associated with higher levels of future-oriented work ethic, with perceived supportive institutional culture emerging as the strongest predictor (β = 0.252; p < 0.001). It is particularly noteworthy that the effect of institutional and relational factors persisted even after controlling for social background variables. Our findings thereby corroborate the theoretical stance that future-oriented work ethic is not solely derived from individual attributes, but can be understood as an orientation shaped during higher education socialization through institutional and social environments. This is an especially important finding in light of the growing heterogeneity of the student body, as it suggests that a supportive institutional culture may contribute to strengthening the future orientation and long-term academic success of students from diverse social backgrounds.
References
- Ahvenharju, S., Minkkinen, M., & Lalot, F. (2018). The five dimensions of Futures Consciousness. Futures, 104, 1–13.
- Benne, R. (2001). Quality with soul. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
- Berger, J. B. (2001). Understanding the organizational culture nature of student persistence. Journal of College Student Retention, 3(1), 3–21.
- Berger, P., Grace, D., & Fokas, E. (2021). Religious America, secular Europe: A theme and variations. Routledge.
- Bess, J. L., & Dee, J. R. (2012). Understanding college and university organization. Stylus Publishing.
- Bocsi, V. (2022). Értelmiségképzés és felsőoktatás [Education of the Intellectual Class and Higher Education]. Belvedere Meridionale.
- Carpenter, J. (2014). Introduction: Christian universities and the global expansion of higher education. In J. Carpenter, L. Perry, & N. S. Lantinga (Eds.), Christian higher education: A global reconnaissance (pp. 8–19). William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
- Ceglédi, T. (2018). Ugródeszkán: Reziliencia és társadalmi egyenlőtlenségek a felsőoktatásban [On the Springboard: Resilience and Social Inequalities in Higher Education]. CHERD-Hungary.
- Demeter-Karászi, Zs. (2025). Intézményi kultúra hallgatói perspektívából [Institutional Culture from a Student's Perspective]. CHERD-Hungary.
- Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
- Kovács, K. (2021). Sportoló campus – Eredményes hallgató? [Athletic Campus – Successful Student?]. Belvedere Meridionale.
- Kovács, K. (2026). Sportolási szokások és a jövőtudatos munkamorál összefüggései [The Relationship Between Exercise Habits and a Future-Oriented Work Ethic]. In G. Pusztai (Ed.), Quo vadis? A jövőtudatosság formálódását meghatározó tényezők vizsgálata nemzetközi hallgatói mintán (pp. 65–68). Debreceni Egyetem Felsőoktatási Kutató és Fejlesztő Központ (CHERD).
- Kuh, G. D. (2001). Organizational culture and student persistence. Journal of College Student Retention, 3(1), 23–39.
- Kuh, G. D., & Umbach, P. D. (2004). College and character. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2004(122), 1–16.
- Leenders, M. V. E., Buunk, A. P., & Henkens, K. (2017). The role of the relationship with parents with respect to work orientation and work ethic. The Journal of General Psychology, 144(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2016.1258386
- Miklódi-Simon, Zs., & Kovács, K. (2026). Extrakurrikuláris tevékenységek összefüggései a jövőtudatos munkamorálra [The Relationship Between Extracurricular Activities and a Future-Oriented Work Ethic]. In G. Pusztai (Ed.), Quo vadis? A jövőtudatosság formálódását meghatározó tényezők vizsgálata nemzetközi hallgatói mintán (pp. 61–64). Debreceni Egyetem Felsőoktatási Kutató és Fejlesztő Központ (CHERD).
- Nurmi, J. E. (1991). How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning. Developmental Review, 11(1), 1–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(91)90002-6
- Pusztai, G. (2010). Kollegiális kezek a felsőoktatásban: Az értelmező közösség hatása a hallgatói pályafutásra [Peer Support in Higher Education: The Impact of the Interpretive Community on Student Careers] [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Debrecen.
- Pusztai, G. (2011). A láthatatlan kéztől a baráti kezekig [From the invisible hand to the hands of friends]. Új Mandátum Kiadó.
- Pusztai, G. (Ed.). (2026). Quo vadis? A jövőtudatosság formálódását meghatározó tényezők vizsgálata nemzetközi hallgatói mintán [Quo vadis? An examination of the factors shaping future-oriented thinking among an international sample of students]. Debreceni Egyetem Felsőoktatási Kutató és Fejlesztő Központ (CHERD).
- Sütő, Z. (2021). A lemorzsolódás és a perzisztencia hatástényezői Közép-Európa kisebbségi magyar felsőoktatási intézményeiben [Factors Influencing Dropout Rates and Retention in Hungarian Minority Higher Education Institutions in Central Europe]. Regio, 29(4), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.17355/rkkpt.v29i4.109
- Sütő, Z. (2025). Who prefers to stay? Individual and institutional factors supporting immobility among minority Hungarian higher education students. Treatises and Documents, Journal of Ethnic Studies, 94(1), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.2478/tdjes-2025-0005
- Tierney, W. G., & Lanford, M. (2018). Institutional culture in higher education. In J. C. Shin & P. Teixeira (Eds.), Encyclopedia of international higher education systems and institutions (pp. 1–9). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_544-1