dEjournals Home Page
Central European Journal of Educational Research
Current Archives Guides Templates Submit online Search
Register Login

Central European Journal of Educational Research

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Minority Education Success
Thematic articles

Staying aspirations among Hungarian minority students in Central and Eastern Europe

Published:
2025-12-31
DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.37441/cejer/2025/7/2/16931
Author
Zsuzsanna Sütő
View
PDF
Keywords
Hungarian minorities youth immobility staying aspirations aspiration–capability framework
License

Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Sütő, Z. (2025). Staying aspirations among Hungarian minority students in Central and Eastern Europe. Central European Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.37441/cejer/2025/7/2/16931
Abstract

Research on youth mobility in Central and Eastern Europe has primarily focused on migration intentions and the drivers of out-migration. Much less attention has been paid to the motivations behind staying, particularly among national minority youth living in peripheral regions. This study examines the staying aspirations of Hungarian minority university students in Central and Eastern Europe and explores the demographic, human, economic, and sociocultural factors that shape their intentions to remain in their home regions. Drawing on the aspiration–capability framework developed by Carling and Schewel, the study analyses survey data from 1,107 hungarian minority students enrolled in higher education institutions across several Central and Eastern European countries. Using multivariate statistical models, the analysis investigates how different forms of capital and regional embeddedness influence students’ aspirations to stay rather than migrate. The findings suggest that staying aspirations are not merely the result of limited mobility opportunities. Instead, they are strongly associated with sociocultural embeddedness, minority community ties, and forms of social capital that connect students to their local environments. These results challenge the dominant migration-centred perspective in mobility research and highlight the importance of immobility as an active and meaningful life strategy. The study contributes to the growing literature on youth immobility by demonstrating how minority status and regional attachment shape mobility aspirations in Central and Eastern Europe.

References
  1. Andrews, M., Clark, K., & Whittaker, W. (2011). The determinants of regional migration in Great Britain: a duration approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 174(1), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2010.00656.x
  2. Belfield, C., & Morris, Z. (1999). Regional migration to and from higher education institutions: Scale, determinants and outcomes. Higher Education Quarterly, 53(3), 240–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2273.00129
  3. Bradley, S., & Taylor, J. (1996). Human capital formation and local economic performance. Regional Studies, 30(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409612331349438
  4. Carling, J. R. (2002): Migration in the age of involuntary immobility: Theoretical reflections and Cape Verdean experiences. Journal of ethnic and migration studies, 28(1), 5–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830120103912
  5. Corbett, M. (2007). All kinds of potential: Women and out-migration in an Atlantic Canadian coastal community. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(4), 430–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.12.001
  6. Corcoran, J., Faggian, A., & McCann, F. (2010). Human capital in remote and rural Australia: The role of graduate migration. Growth and Change, 41(2), 192–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2010.00525.x
  7. Creighton, M. (2013). The role of aspirations in domestic and international migration. The Social Science Journal, 50(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2012.07.006
  8. Faggian, A., & McCann, P. (2009). Human capital, graduate migration and innovation in British regions. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(2), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben042
  9. Faggian, A., McCann, P., & Sheppard, S. (2007). Some evidence that women are more mobile than men: Gender differences in UK graduate migration behavior. Journal of Regional Science, 47(3), 517–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2007.00518.x
  10. Fényes, H., & Pusztai, G. (2020). Nemi szerepattitűdök és vallásosság a felsőoktatási hallgatók körében [Gender Role Attitudes and Religiosity among Higher Education Students]. Szociológiai Szemle, 30(3), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.51624/SzocSzemle.2020.3.3
  11. Fischer, P., A., & Malmberg, G. (1997). Immobility in Sweden. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research, 34, 71–86. https://doi.org/10.23979/fypr.44922
  12. Geréb, L. (2008). A regionális migráció hatása a humántőke-beruházásra és megtérülésre. Esettanulmány a határon túli magyarságra vonatkozóan [The Impact of Regional Migration on Human Capital Investment and Returns: A Case Study of Hungarian Minorities Beyond the Borders]. Tér és Társadalom, 22(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.22.2.1176
  13. Gyugyík, L. (2005). A határon túli magyarok számának alakulása az 1990-es években [Trends in the Population of Hungarians Living Beyond the Borders in the 1990s]. Magyar Tudomány, 2, 132–144.
  14. Haapanen, M., & Ritsilä, J (2007). Can migration decisions be affected by income policy interventions? Evidence from Finland. Regional Studies, 41(3), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701282087
  15. Haapanen, M., & Tervo, H. (2009). Return and onward migration of highly educated: Evidence from residence spells of Finnish graduates. School of Business and Economics, University of Jyväskylä.
  16. Halfacree, K. (2004). An utopian imagination in migration's terra incognita? acknowledging the non-economic worlds of migration decision-making. Popul. Space Place, 10, 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.326
  17. Helderman, A. C., Van Ham, M., & Mulder, C. H. (2006). Migration and home ownership. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 97(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2006.00506.x
  18. Kazakis, P., & Faggian, A. (2017). Mobility, education and labor market outcomes for US graduates: Is selectivity important?. The Annals of Regional Science, 59(3), 731–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-016-0773-6
  19. Kiss, T., & Csata, I. (2007). Népesedési perspektívák. Az erdélyi magyar népesség regionálisan tagolt előreszámítása húsz és harminc éves időtávra [Population Prospects: A Regionally Disaggregated Projection of the Hungarian Population in Transylvania over a Twenty- and Thirty-Year Time Horizon]. Kriterion – RMDSZ Ügyvezető Elnökség.
  20. Lundholm, E., Garvill, J., Malmberg, G., & Westin, K. (2004). Forced or free movers? The motives, voluntariness and selectivity of interregional migration in the Nordic countries. Population, Space and Place, 10(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.315
  21. Myers, S. M., 2000. The Impact of Religious Involvement on Migration. Social Forces, 79(2), 755–783. https://doi.org/10.2307/2675516
  22. Nijkamp, P., & Poot, J. (1998). Spatial perspectives on new theories of economic growth. The annals of regional science, 32(1), 7–37.
  23. Nivalainen, S. (2004). Determinants of family migration: short moves vs. long moves. Journal of Population Economics, 17(1), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-003-0131-8
  24. Obádovics, C. (2019). Népesedési folyamatok területi egyenlőtlenségei a Kárpát-medence országaiban [Regional Inequalities in Demographic Processes in the Countries of the Carpathian Basin]. Gazdaság és társadalom, 12(2), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.21637/GT.2019.2.01
  25. Péti M., Pakot, L., Megyesi, Z., & Szabó, B. (2020a). A Kárpát-medencei magyarság népesség-előreszámítása [Population Projections of Hungarians in the Carpathian Basin], 2011-2051. Demográfia, 63(4), 269–318. https://doi.org/10.21543/DEM.63.4.1
  26. Péti, M., Nagy, Sz., & Szabó, B. (2020b). Kárpát-medencei külhoni magyarság főbb helyi önkormányzati és településszerkezeti jellemzői [Main Local Government and Settlement Structure Characteristics of Hungarian Minority Communities in the Carpathian Basin]. Területi Statisztika, 60(3), 277–308. https://doi.org/10.15196/TS600301
  27. Pusztai, G., & Márkus, Zs., (2019). Paradox of Assimilation among Indigenous Higher Education Students in Four Central European Countries. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 13(4), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15595692.2019.1623193
  28. Rérat, P. (2014). The selective migration of young graduates: Which of them return to their rural home region and which do not?. Journal of Rural Studies, 35, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.04.009
  29. Salat, L. (2012). Kisebbségi egyetemek a világ néhány térségében [Minority Universities in Selected Regions of the World]. Educatio, 21(1), 49–66.
  30. Schewel, K. (2020): Understanding Immobility: Moving Beyond the Mobility Bias in Migration Studies. International Migration Review, 54(2), 328–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918319831952
  31. Sütő, Z. (2025). Who Prefers to Stay? Individual and Institutional Factors Supporting Immobility Among Minority Hungarian Higher EducationStudents. Treatises and Documents, Journal of Ethnic Studies / Razprave in Gradivo, Revija za narodnostna vprašanja, 94(1), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.2478/tdjes-2025-0005
  32. Székely, L. (2023). Módszertani jegyzet a nagymintás ifjúságkutatás külhoni eredmények értelmezéséhez [A Methodological Note on the Interpretation of Cross-Border Results from Large-Scale Youth Research] In E. Vita & V. Veres (Eds.), Változó ifjúság a Kárpát-medece országaiban. Szociológiai tanulmányok a magyar fiatalok két évtizedéről (pp. 299–309). Nemzeti Kisebbségkutató Intézet.
  33. Tjaden, J. (2021). Measuring migration 2.0: a review of digital data sources. Comparative Migration Studies, 9(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-021-00273-x
  34. Tonk, M. (2012). Lehetőségek, modellek, kihívások a kisebbségi felsőoktatás-politikában [Opportunities, Models, and Challenges in Minority Higher Education Policy]. Az erdélyi magyar felsőoktatás és a Sapientia EMTE. Pro Minoritate, 1(04), 69–82.
  35. van Dalen, H. P., & Kène, H. (2008). Emigration intentions: Mere words or true plans? Explaining international migration intentions and behavior. Explaining International Migration Intentions and Behavior. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1153985
  36. Van Ham, M., Mulder, C. H., & Hooimeijer, P. (2001). Spatial flexibility in job mobility: macrolevel opportunities and microlevel restrictions. Environment and Planning a, 33(5), 921–940. https://doi.org/10.1068/a33164
  37. Venhorst, V., Van Dijk, J., & Van Wissen, L. E. O. (2010). Do the best graduates leave the peripheral areas of the Netherlands?. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 101(5), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2010.00629.x
  38. Veres, V. (2023). Az erdélyi magyarok demográfiai változásainak három évtizede: fókuszban a természetes népmozgalom és az elöregedés [Three Decades of Demographic Change among Hungarians in Transylvania: Natural Population Change and Ageing in Focus]. Erdélyi Társadalom, 21(2), 9–42. https://doi.org/10.17177/77171.284
Most read articles by the same author(s)