dEjournals Home Page
Economica
Opening page Current
Archives Search
Register Login

Economica

Vol. 17 No. 1-2 (2026)
Articles

New directions in aviation controlling – a systematic review

Published:
2026-02-23
DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.47282/economica/2026/17/1-2/16181
Author
Eszter Kárpáti
View
pdf (Hungarian)
Keywords
ULCC Ancillary revenue Dual-till model Smart airport Predictive controlling
License

Copyright (c) 2026 Eszter Kárpáti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Kárpáti, E. (2026). New directions in aviation controlling – a systematic review. Economica, 17(1-2), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.47282/economica/2026/17/1-2/16181
Abstract

The aviation industry has become a rapidly growing sector in a turbulent environment over the past decade, especially in the case of ULCC (Ultra Low-Cost Carrier) airlines in Europe. The growth of these kinds of airlines has led to volatile airport revenues, further diversified by AI and digitalisation. The aim of this paper is to analyse, through a systematic review, the role of controlling methods in this context, with a particular focus on Europe and the Central and Eastern European market. The research was conducted using the PRISMA method on the Scopus and Web of Science databases, covering the period 2005–2025. The study is structured around three main topics: cost-cutting methods of ULCC airlines, opportunities for increasing airport revenues, and the effects of digitalisation on the aviation industry, especially on controlling systems. The results show that controlling methods are not uniform and are often unable to adapt to a rapidly changing environment and operational complexity. One of the main conclusions of this research is that it may be worthwhile to create an entirely new, industry-specific controlling method that synthesises the principles of ULCC operations, airport management, and the improvement opportunities brought by digitalisation. The primary goal of this paper is to provide a foundation for further research and for the development of such a model.

References
  1. [1] Amankwah-Amoah, J., Nyame-Asiamah, F., & Ayiine-Etigo, D. (2024). Navigating temporary competitive advantage: Pandemic-driven strategies in the global airline industry. Thunderbird International Business Review, 66(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22423
  2. [2] Bezerra, G. C. L., & Gomes, C. F. S. (2015). The effects of service quality dimensions and passenger characteristics on passenger's overall satisfaction with an airport. Journal of Air Transport Management, , 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.03.001
  3. [3] Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015). On being 'systematic' in literature reviews in IS. Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.26
  4. [4] Escobar-Rodríguez, T., & Carvajal-Trujillo, E. (2013). Online drivers of consumer purchase of website airline tickets. Journal of Air Transport Management, 32, 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.06.018
  5. [5] Fuerst, F., Gross, S., & Klose, U. (2011). The sky is the limit? The determinants and constraints of airport commercial revenues. Journal of Air Transport Management, 17(5), 278–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2011.02.005
  6. [6] Graham, A., & Dennis, N. (2010). The impact of low cost airline operations to Malta. Journal of Air Transport Management, 16(3), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2009.09.004
  7. [7] Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information &Amp; Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
  8. [8] Huderek-Glapska, S. (2015). Airport performance and regional development-A case study of Polish airports.Research in Transportation Business &Amp; Management, 17, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2015.10.005
  9. [9] Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7)https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  10. [10] Pantelaki, E., & Porta, F. (2025). Low-cost carriers mean low-cost tourists? Exploring the expenditure patterns beyond airline ticket. Tourism Economics. Advance Online Publication, https://doi.org/10.1177/13548166241234567
  11. [11] Pimiä, A., Urponen, A., & Kolehmainen, A. (2024). Green horizons ahead: Navigating carbon neutrality in European transportation by sky and sea. Economics and Culture, 21(1), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2024-0011
  12. [12] Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 78–93.
  13. [13] Romme, A. G. L. (2016). The management profession: Why, what, and how? Management Research Review, 39(1), 67–84.
  14. [14] Rubio-Andrada, L., Celemín-Pedroche, M. S., Escat-Cortés, M. D., & Jiménez-Crisóstomo, A. (2023). Passengers' satisfaction with the technologies used in smart airports: An empirical study from a gender perspective.Journal of Air Transport Management, 107https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102347
  15. [15] Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
  16. [16] Wensveen, J., & Leick, R. (2009). The long-haul low-cost carrier: A unique business model. Journal of Air Transport Management, 15(3), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2008.09.003
  17. [17] Wittmer, A., & Bieger, T. (2022). Third-party ancillary revenues: From passenger needs to airline strategy. Journal of Air Transport Management, 103https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102263
  18. [18] Zuidberg, J. (2014). Key drivers for a differentiated airport business model. Journal of Air,