The Development of Growth Accounting Techniques in the Mirror of Economic Growth
Author
View
Keywords
How To Cite
Abstract
In this article we present the development of certain growth theories that model the main sources of growth. Since the elasticity of substitution – one of the most important parameters of production function – is not unity, as the Cobb-Douglas production function assumes, it can be different from a value of 1; hence we need a more general CES-type (Constant Elasticity of Substitution) production function. Another important question is the classification of factors of production. The elasticity of substitution is an efficiency factor as well, thus it receives special attention in the analysis. Finally we summarize the main papers that are mainly concerned with growth accounting, and try to answer the question of which factors play a significant or less significant role in economic growth. Growth accounting is strongly connected to growth theories so we refer back to growth theory at certain points.
JEL classification: E13, O47
References
- Abramivitz, M. (1957): Resources on Output Trends in the United States since 1870. American Economic Review 46:5-23
- Acemoglu, D. (2009): Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton University Press, New Jersey
- Aghion, P. – Howitt, P. (1999): Endogenous Growth Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts, London
- Arrow, K. J. – Chenery, H. B. – Minhas, B. S. – Solow, R. M. (1961): Capital-labor substitution and economic efficiency. The Review of Economics and Statistics 43:225-250.
- Barro, R. J. – Sala-i-Martín, X. (1999): Economic Growth. McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Caselli F. (2005): „Accounting for Cross-Country Income Differences”, Handbook of Economic Growth. In: Philippe Aghion és Steven Durlauf
- Cobb, C. W. – Douglas, P. H. (1928): A theory of production. American Economic Review 18:139-165.
- Comin, D. – Hobijn, B. – Rovito, E. (2008): Technology usage lags. Journal of Economic Growth 13, 237–256
- Domar, E. (1946): „Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth and Employment”. Econometrica 14:137-47.
- La Grandville, de, O. (1989): In Quest of the Slutsky Diamond, The American Economic Review 79:468-481.
- Easterly, W.– Levine, R. (2001): „It’s Not Factor Accumulation”: Stylized Facts and Growth Models.” The World Bank Economic Review 15 2: 177-219.
- Frankel, M. (1962): The Production Function in allocation and Growth: A Synthesis. American Economic Review 52:995-1022.
- Harrod, R. F. (1939): „An Essay in Dynamic Theory” Economic Journal 49, 14-33.
- Henry, P. B. (2007): Capital Account Liberalization: Theory, Evidence and Speculation. Journal of Economics Literature 45, 4: 887-935.
- Kehoe, T. J. – Prescott, E. C. (2002): „Great Depressions of the Twentieth Century”, Review of Economic Dynamics, 5, 1: 1-18.
- Klump, R. – Preissler, H. (2000): CES Production Functions and Economic Growth, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 102:41-56.
- Limam, Y. R. – Miller, S. M. (2004): Explaining Economic Growth: Factor Accumulation,Total Factor Productivity Growth, and Production Efficiency Improvement, Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,Working Paper 2004-20, http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1134&context=econ_wpapers (2009-06-17)
- Lucas, R. E. (1988): „On the Mechanics of Economic Development.” Journal of Monetary Economics 22:3-42.
- Mankiw, N. G., D. Romer, and D. N. Weil (1992): „A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 2:407-437.
- Romer, P. M. (1986): „Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 94:1002-1037.
- Romer, P. M. (1990): „Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98:71-102.
- Solow, R. (1956): A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics 70:65-94.
- Solow, R. (1957): Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics 39, 3:321-320.
- Yuhn, K. (1991): Economic Growth, Technical Change Biasis, and the Elasticity of Substitution: A Test of de La Grandville-Hypothesis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 73:340-346.