Tanulmányok

The power of path dependence? State capacity and autonomy in East Central Europe during transition

Megjelent:
2020-08-27
Szerző
Megtekintés
How To Cite
Kiválasztott formátum: APA
Ádám, Z. (2020). The power of path dependence? State capacity and autonomy in East Central Europe during transition. Competitio, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2004/1/11
Absztrakt

The paper examines development of state capacities and autonomy in East Central Europe during transition, and attempts to establish a relation between state characteristics and trajectories of economic transformation, especially with regard to privatisation and FDI. The assertion is that the quality of state capacities and the degree of state autonomy, although changing over time, mutually reinforces the formulating of economic policies, and hence in structural transformation. Thus, state characteristics are important determinants of transition outcome, but are themselves affected by structural economic changes.

Hivatkozások
  1. Aslund, Anders. 2002. Building Capitalism. The Transformation of the Former Soviet Bloc. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Balcerowicz, Leszek. 1995. Socialism, capitalism, transformation. Budapest: CEU Press.
  3. Bartlett, David and Anna Seleny. 1998. “The Political Enforcement of Liberalism: Bargaining, Institutions, and Auto Multinationals in Hungary”. International Studies
  4. Quarterly. Vol. 42, pp. 319-118.
  5. Bevan, Alan, Saul Estrin and Klaus Meyer. 2001. “Institution Building and the Integration of Eastern Europe in International Production”. One Europe or Several? Working Paper 16/2001.
  6. Blomström, Magnus and Hakan Persson. 1983. “Foreign Investment and Spillover Efficiency in an Underdeveloped Economy: Evidence from the Mexican Manufacturing Industry”. World Development. Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 493-501.
  7. Clarke, Thomas and Christos Pitelis eds. 1993. The Political Economy of Privatization. London and New York: Routledge.
  8. Damijan, Joze P., Boris Majcen, Matija Rojec és Mark Knell. 2001. “The Role of FDI, R&D Accumulation and Trade in Transferring Technology to Transition Countries:
  9. Evidence from Firm Panel Data for Eight Transition Countries”. Institute for Economic Research Working Paper No. 10. Ljubljana.
  10. Dyker, David, Ágnes Nagy, Hedvika Spilek, Peter Stanovnik, Jeffrey Turk and Péter Vince. 2001. "East-West Networks and Their Alignment: Industrial Networks in Hungary and Slovenia". Mimeo.
  11. Dyker, David and Nick von Tunzelmann. 2002. “Network alignment in transition countries: A survey of Hungarian and Slovenian Companies”. Mimeo.
  12. Dunning, John H. 1993. Multinational Enterprise and the Global Economy. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.
  13. EBRD. 1999. Transition Report. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
  14. Evans, Peter B. 1987. “Foreign Capital and the Third World State”. In: Myron Weiner and Samuel P. Huntington eds. Understanding Political Development. Prospects Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
  15. Evans, Peter B. 1995. Embedded Autonomy. States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton:, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  16. Evans, Peter B. 1997. “The Eclipse of the State? Reflections on Stateness in an Era of Globalization”. World Politics. 50, October 1997.
  17. Farkas, Péter. 2000. “The Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on R&D and Innovation in Hungary”. Institute for World Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Working Papers, No. 108.
  18. Fligstein, Neil. 1996. “Markets as Politics: A Political-Cultural Approach to Market Institutions”. American Sociological Review. Vol. 61, pp. 656-673.
  19. Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  20. Greskovits, Béla. 1998. Brothers-in-Arms or Rivals in Politics? Top Politicians and Top Policy Makers in the Hungarian Transformation. Collegium Budapest Discussion
  21. Paper Series No. 55.
  22. Hellman, Joel and Daniel Kaufmann. 2001. „Confronting the Challenge of State Capture in Transition Economies“. Finance and Development (A quarterly magazine of the IMF). Vol. 38, No. 3, September 2001.
  23. Hellmann, Joel S., Geraint Jones and Daniel Kaufmann. 2000. Seize the State, Seize the Day: State Capture, Corruption, and Influence in Transition Economies. Washington DC: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2444.
  24. Holmes, Stephen. 1997. “When Less State Means Less Freedom” Transitions. Vol. 4, No. 4, September 1997, pp. 66-75.
  25. Kornai, János. 1992. The Socialist System. The Political Economy of Communism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  26. Kornai, János. 2001. “Hardening the budget constraint: The experiece of the post-socialist countries”. European Economic Review. Vol. 45, pp. 1573-1599.
  27. Landesmann, Michael. 2000. "Structural Change in the Transition Economies, 1989-1999". in Economic Survey of Europe. 2000 No. 2/3, UN ECE, pp. 95-123.
  28. Meier, Gerald M. and Joseph E. Stiglitz eds..2001. Frontiers of Development Economics: The Future in Perspective. Washington DC: The World Bank.
  29. Migdal, Joel. 1988. Strong Societies and Weak States. State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  30. Mihályi, Péter. 1998. A magyar privatizáció krónikája: 1989-1997 (Chronicle of the Hungarian Privatisation: 1989-1997). Budapest: Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvkiadó.
  31. Moran, Theodore H. 1998. Foreign Direct Investment and Development: The New Policy Agenda for Developing Countries and Economies in Transition. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics, 1998.
  32. Nordlinger, Eric. 1987. “Taking the State Seriously”. In: Myron Weiner and Samuel P. Huntington eds. Understanding Political Development. Prospects Heights, IL:
  33. Waveland Press.
  34. Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  35. Pavlinek, Petr. 2002. “Domestic Privatisation and its Effects on Industrial Enterprises in East-Central Europe: Evidence from the Czech Motor Component Industry”. Europe-Asia Studies. Vol. 54, No. 7, pp. 1127-1150.
  36. Shafer, D. Michael. 1994. Winners and Losers. How Sectors Shape the Developmental Prospects of States. Ithaka and London: Cornell University Press.
  37. Skocpol, Theda. 1985. “Bringing the State Back in”. In: P. B. Evans, D. Rueschmeyer, and T. Skocpol eds. Bringing the State Back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Stiglitz, Joseph E et al. 1989. The economic role of the state. Oxford: Blackwell.
  39. Stiglitz, Joseph E. and Shahid Yusuf eds.. 2001. Rethinking the East Asia Miracle. New York: Oxford University Press.
  40. Vernon, Raymond. 1971. Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of U.S. Enterprises. London: Longman.
  41. Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.