dEjournals Home Page
Central European Journal of Educational Research
Current Archives Guides Templates Submit online Search
Register Login

Central European Journal of Educational Research

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Continuity and Innovation in Educational Sciences

Research papers

Resource or risk? The role of higher education parental involvement in students’ future-aware work ethic

Published:
2026-06-03
DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.37441/cejer/2026/8/1/17017
Authors
Cintia Csók,
Viktória Lánczi,
Katalin Pallay,
Anett Hrabéczy,
Ildikó Orosz
View
PDF
Keywords
higher education parental involvement work ethic future awareness
License

Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Csók, C. ., Lánczi, V., Pallay, K. ., Hrabéczy, A. ., & Orosz, I. . (2026). Resource or risk? The role of higher education parental involvement in students’ future-aware work ethic. Central European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.37441/cejer/2026/8/1/17017
Abstract

One of the key determinants of higher education students’ academic progress is future-oriented work ethic, which can be reflected in persistence in pursuing long-term goals, goal-directed effort, and disciplined work practices. The aim of this study is to examine how different patterns of parental involvement in higher education are associated with students’ future-aware work ethic and how these forms of involvement function as either resources or risk factors in its development. The analysis is based on a secondary examination of data from the 2023–2024 survey of the MTA–DE Public Education Development Research Program (N = 1,336), conducted among higher education students in Hungary and Hungarian minority regions of the Carpathian Basin. To identify patterns of parental involvement, cluster analysis was applied, followed by an examination of the relationship between the identified clusters and the studied attitude using analysis of variance and two-step linear regression models. The findings indicate that parental involvement does not exert a uniform effect on students’ future-oriented work ethic. Students with highly involved parental backgrounds are characterized by significantly higher levels of future-oriented work ethic, and this association remains robust even after controlling for socio-demographic background variables. In contrast, ambivalent parental involvement shows a consistently negative relationship with the examined attitude. The effect of low parental involvement weakens when background factors are taken into account, suggesting a mediating role of social background. Overall, the results highlight that the quality and patterns of parental involvement play a decisive role in shaping this form of work ethic: supportive and consistent parental engagement can be interpreted as a resource, whereas ambivalent involvement constitutes a risk factor.

References
  1. Az Zahra, D., Ariyani, M., & Suryaratri, R. D. (2025). Analisis psikometrik instrumen grit (Grit-O): Studi pada mahasiswa sarjana tahun kedua dan ketiga masa studi di Indonesia [Psychometric analysis of the grit instrument (Grit-O): A study of second- and third-year undergraduate students in Indonesia]. IDEA: Jurnal Psikologi, 9(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.32492/idea.v9i2.9209
  2. Bacskai, K., Alter, E., Dan, B. A., Vályogos, K., & Pusztai, G. (2024). Positive or negative and general or differentiated effect? Correlation between parental involvement and student achievement. Education Sciences, 14(9), 941. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090941
  3. Bocsi, V., Ceglédi, T., Kocsis, Zs., Kovács, K. E., Kovács, K., Müller, A., Pallay, K., Szabó, B. É., Szigeti, F., & Tóth, D. A. (2019). The discovery of the possible reasons for delayed graduation and dropout in the light of a qualitative research study. Journal of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation, 3(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1556/2059.02.2018.08
  4. Ceglédi, T., Fényes, H., & Pusztai, G. (2022). The effect of resilience and gender on the persistence of higher education students. Social Sciences, 11(3), Article 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11030093
  5. Coats, N. (2014). Perceived parental involvement: Impact on student involvement in higher education (Master’s thesis, Taylor University). Master of Arts in Higher Education (MAHE) Theses, 68. https://pillars.taylor.edu/mahe/68
  6. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl. 1), S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
  7. Cutrona, C. E., Cole, V., Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Russell, D. W. (1994). Perceived parental social support and academic achievement: An attachment theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(2), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.369
  8. Csók, C., & Pusztai, G. (2023). Stratified student society in higher education fields: Impact of expected earning on students’ career. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 12(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2023.1.40
  9. Csók, C., Hrabéczy, A., & Németh, D. K. (2019). Focus on the dropout students’ secondary school experience and career orientation. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 9(4), 708–720. https://doi.org/10.1556/063.9.2019.4.57
  10. Dan, B. A. (2023). The importance of student–teacher relationship in Romanian SEN schools among Hungarian minorities. Central European Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.37441/cejer/2023/5/2/13280
  11. Dinyáné Szabó, M., & Pusztai, G. (2017). Investigation of persistence value as a study protection factor among health care organizer students. European Journal of Mental Health, 12(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.5708/EJMH.12.2017.2.1
  12. Dinyáné Szabó, M., Pusztai, G., & Szemerszki, M. (2019). Lemorzsolódási kockázat az orvostanhallgatók körében [Dropout risk among medical students]. Orvosi Hetilap, 160(21), 829–834. https://doi.org/10.1556/650.2019.31408
  13. Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
  14. Epstein, J. L. (1995). School-family-community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(9), 701–712.
  15. Garrett, T. C. (2015). Faculty perceptions of parental involvement in higher education (Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University).
  16. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
  17. Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children's self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.143
  18. Grolnick, W. S., & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1994). Parents' involvement in children's schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 65(1), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131378
  19. Hagedorn, L. S. (2012). How to define retention: A new look at an old problem. In A. Seidman (Ed.), College student retention: Formula for student success (pp. 81–99). Rowman & Littlefield.
  20. Heublein, U. (2014). Student drop-out from German higher education institutions. European Journal of Education, 49(4), 497–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12097
  21. Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015362
  22. Husman, J., & Shell, D. F. (2008). Beliefs and perceptions about the future: A measurement of future time perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(2), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.08.001
  23. Kiyama, J. M., Harper, C. E., Ramos, D., Aguayo, D., Page, L. A., & Riester, K. A. (2015). Parent and family engagement in higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 41(6), 1–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.20024
  24. Kocsis, N. (2025). Opportunities and barriers in the partnership between foster families and schools. Central European Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), Article 14582. https://doi.org/10.37441/cejer/2025/7/1/14582
  25. Kocsis, Zs., & Pusztai, G. (2020). Student employment as a possible factor of dropout. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 17(4), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.17.4.2020.4.10
  26. Kocsis, Zs., Alter, E., & Pusztai, G. (2022). The role of student employment in persistence and efficiency in STEM higher education. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 10(4), 831–848. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2177
  27. Kocsis, Zs., Kas, D., & Pusztai, G. (2025). Wings or handcuffs? The dilemmas of helicopter parenting based on a systematic literature review. Social Sciences, 14(10), Article 621. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14100621
  28. Kocsis, Zs., Markos, V., Fazekas, E., Fényes, Z. H., & Pusztai, G. (2024). “Won’t be enough to invite parents to school events”: Results of a systematic literature review of parental volunteering. Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica: Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 19(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1970-2221/20185
  29. Kovács, K. (2026). Sportolási szokások és a jövőtudatos munkamorál összefüggései [Relationships between sporting habits and future-conscious work ethic]. In G. Pusztai (Ed.), Quo vadis? A jövőtudatosság formálódását meghatározó tényezők vizsgálata nemzetközi hallgatói mintán [Quo vadis? Examining the factors shaping future consciousness among an international student sample] (pp. 65–68). Debreceni Egyetem Felsőoktatási Kutató és Fejlesztő Központ (CHERD).
  30. Kovács, K. E., Dan, B., Hrabéczy, A., Bacskai, K., & Pusztai, G. (2022). Is resilience a trait or a result of parental involvement? The results of a systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 12(6), Article 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060372
  31. Kovács, K., Ceglédi, T., Csók, C., Demeter-Karászi, Z., Dusa, Á. R., Fényes, H., Hrabéczy, A., Kocsis, Zs., Kovács, K. E., Markos, V., Máté-Szabó, B. É., Németh, D. K., Pallay, K., Pusztai, G., Szigeti, F., Tóth, D. A., & Váradi, J. (2019). Lemorzsolódott hallgatók 2018 [Students who dropped out]. Debreceni Egyetem Felsőoktatási Kutató és Fejlesztő Központ (CHERD).
  32. Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116
  33. Lánczi, V., Csók, C., & Pallay, K. (2026). A szülői bevonódás a felsőoktatásban [Parental involvement in higher education]. In G. Pusztai (Ed.), Quo vadis? A jövőtudatosság formálódását meghatározó tényezők vizsgálata nemzetközi hallgatói mintán [Quo vadis? Examining the factors shaping future consciousness among an international student sample] (pp. 38–45). Debreceni Egyetem Felsőoktatási Kutató és Fejlesztő Központ (CHERD).
  34. Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
  35. Lowe, K. E. (2015). Parental involvement during the college transition: Trajectories and associations with academic success, well-being, and individuation (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University).
  36. Major, E. (2023). Parent-teacher communication from the perspective of the educator. Central European Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.37441/cejer/2023/5/2/13281
  37. Miklódi-Simon, Zs., & Kovács, K. (2026). Extrakurrikuláris tevékenységek összefüggései a jövőtudatos munkamorálra [Relationships between extracurricular activities and future-conscious work ethic]. In G. Pusztai (Ed.), Quo vadis? A jövőtudatosság formálódását meghatározó tényezők vizsgálata nemzetközi hallgatói mintán [Quo vadis? Examining the factors shaping future consciousness among an international student sample] (pp. 61–64). Debreceni Egyetem Felsőoktatási Kutató és Fejlesztő Központ (CHERD).
  38. Miller, R. B., & Brickman, S. J. (2004). A model of future-oriented motivation and self-regulation. Educational Psychology Review, 16(1), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000012343.96370.39
  39. Nurmi, J.-E. (1991). How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning. Developmental Review, 11(1), 1–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(91)90002-6
  40. Oliver, B. (2011). Parental involvement as it relates to student satisfaction for undergraduate students at a 4-year public university (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Alabama). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
  41. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). Jossey-Bass.
  42. Perna, L. W., & Titus, M. A. (2005). The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: An examination of racial/ethnic group differences. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(5), 485–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2005.11772296
  43. Pomerantz, E. M., Moorman, E. A., & Litwack, S. D. (2007). The how, whom, and why of parents’ involvement in children’s academic lives: More is not always better. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 373–410. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430305567
  44. Pusztai, G. (2011). A láthatatlan kéztől a baráti kezekig: Hallgatói értelmező közösségek a felsőoktatásban [From the invisible hand to helping hands: Student interpretive communities in higher education]. Új Mandátum Kiadó.
  45. Pusztai, G. (2019). The role of intergenerational social capital in diminishing student attrition. Journal of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation, 3(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1556/2059.02.2018.04
  46. Pusztai, G. (2022). Forms of capital utilized during a student career. In G. Pusztai (Ed.), Sociology of education (pp. 28–42). Debrecen University Press.
  47. Pusztai, G. (Ed.). (2026). Quo vadis? A jövőtudatosság formálódását meghatározó tényezők vizsgálata nemzetközi hallgatói mintán [Quo vadis? Examining the factors shaping future consciousness among an international student sample]. Debreceni Egyetem Felsőoktatási Kutató és Fejlesztő Központ (CHERD).
  48. Pusztai, G., & Csók, C. (2020). Ambivalence of professional socialization in social and educational professions. Social Sciences, 9(8), Article 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9080147
  49. Pusztai, G., & Szigeti, F. (Eds.). (2021). Előrehaladás és lemorzsolódási kockázat a felsőoktatásban [Academic progress and dropout risk in higher education]. CHERD-Hungary.
  50. Pusztai, G., Fényes, H., & Kovács, K. (2022). Factors influencing the chance of dropout or being at risk of dropout in higher education. Education Sciences, 12(11), Article 804. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110804
  51. Pusztai, G., Fényes, H., Szigeti, F., & Pallay, K. (2019). Dropped-out students and the decision to drop out in Hungary. Central European Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.37441/CEJER/2019/1/1/3341
  52. Pusztai, G., Hrabéczy, A., & Csók, C. (2024). A lemorzsolódási rizikó hallgatói percepciója: Az önmagukat átlagnál rizikósabbnak érző hallgatók háttértényezői [Students’ perceptions of dropout risk: Background factors of students who perceive themselves as being at higher-than-average risk]. In G. Pusztai, Á. Engler, A. Hrabéczy, & Á. Bencze (Eds.), Mesterség és intelligencia az oktatáskutatásban: Tanulmányok Kozma Tamás tiszteletére [Craft and intelligence in educational research: Studies in honor of Tamás Kozma] (pp. 161–175). Debreceni Egyetem Felsőoktatási Kutató és Fejlesztő Központ (CHERD).
  53. Pusztai, G., Hrabéczy, A., & Csók, C. (2025). Parental involvement as an antidote to student dropout in higher education: Students’ perceptions of dropout risk. Open Education Studies, 7(1), Article 20250089. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2025-0089
  54. Rappaport, H. (2023). A qualitative exploration of parent involvement programs in higher education (Publication No. 4764) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas]. UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. https://doi.org/10.34917/36114789
  55. Rusznák, A., & Pusztai, G. (2024). School-friendly parents? Characteristics of parents’ involvement in vocational schools in Hungary. Horyzonty Wychowania, 23(66), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.35765/hw.2024.2366.04
  56. Seginer, R. (2009). Future orientation: Developmental and ecological perspectives. Springer.
  57. Segrin, C., Woszidlo, A., Givertz, M., & Montgomery, N. (2013). Parent and child traits associated with overparenting. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 32(6), 569–595. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2013.32.6.569
  58. Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in three life domains: The role of parents’ and teachers’ autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(6), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-8948-y
  59. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170024
  60. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
  61. Tóth, D. A., Szemerszki, M., Ceglédi, T., & Máté-Szabó, B. (2019). The different patterns of dropout according to the level and the field of education. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 9(1), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1556/063.9.2019.1.23
  62. Váradi, J., Demeter-Karászi, Z., & Kovács, K. (2019). The connection between extracurricular, leisure time activities, religiosity and the reasons for drop-out. Central European Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.37441/CEJER/2019/1/1/3343
  63. Wartman, K. L., & Savage, M. (2015). Parent and family engagement in higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 41(6).
  64. Whaley, G. L., & Pfefferbaum, B. (2023). Parental challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic: Psychological outcomes and risk and protective factors. Current Psychiatry Reports, 25(4), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-023-01412-0
  65. Wilcox, P., Winn, S., & Fyvie-Gauld, M. (2005). “It was nothing to do with the university, it was just the people”: The role of social support in the first-year experience of higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 30(6), 707–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500340036
  66. Wolf, D. S., Sax, L. J., & Harper, C. E. (2009). Parental engagement and contact in the academic lives of college students. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 46(2), 325–358. https://doi.org/10.2202/1949-6605.6044
  67. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
  68. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Most read articles by the same author(s)