Search

Search Results

• A Case Study on the Interaction Between the General Data Protection Regulation and Artificial Intelligence Technologies

  45-57

  Gizem Gültekin Várkonyi

  Views:

  244

  This paper presents a general overview of the problems regarding the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) raised in the official published works of the European Union (EU) and interprets these problems from the perspective of the Hungarian experts as a case study. Even though a new regulation on AI has already been proposed at the EU level, the paper evaluates specific rules and principles regarding data protection since data is the lifeblood of AI systems and the protection of such data is a fundamental right enshrined in the EU legislation via the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The result of the study shows that the application of the GDPR on AI systems in an efficient and uniform way might be at stake since different outputs were generated by the experts to the same legal questions deriving from a scenario presented.

• About the Costs of Public Procurements

  103-127

  Zsolt Pfeffer

  Views:

  125

  This study summarizes the basic types of costs which are related to public procurements and which are based on expressed legal regulations. It analyses the costs of tender documentation, the experts, the tender guarantee, the mandatory examination of the notice and the following legal institutions which are related to the legal remedies: the administrative service fee and the fine. The article compares the solutions of other countries: it examines the regulation of fees and the consideration of tender documentation. The Polish, the Austrian and the german examples show that the Hungarian legislator could improve the Hungarian regulation.

• The Future Civil Procedure From a Bird’s-eye View

  115-127

  Sándor Udvardy

  Views:

  160

  The future Civil Procedure has been under recodification for three years now and the experts have made considerable effort to create a 21st century code. Now the draft of the Code was published by the Minister of Justice for social debate, and later on a Bill was introduced. This article offers several humble recommendations de lege ferenda, where the text of the code needs amendment and no interpretation may result in the desirable outcome. Several earlier remarks of the author have been accepted and are now reflected in the Bill, and these points shall be identified and evaluated.