dEjournals Nyitóoldal
Competitio
Online megjelent Aktuális Legtöbbet olvasott Archívum Keresés
Regisztráció Bejelentkezés

Competitio

Évf. 12 szám 1 (2013)
Kutatás közben

Development aid as a global public good – a case study

Megjelent:
June 17, 2013
DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2013/1/5
Szerző
Horváthné Angyal Boglárka
Megtekintés
en
Kulcsszavak
public goods international aid regime NGO
How To Cite
Kiválasztott formátum: APA
Horváthné Angyal, B. (2013). Development aid as a global public good – a case study. Competitio, 12(1), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2013/1/5
Absztrakt

This study introduces a new concept to the analysis of development aid. Aid is regarded as a global public good where donors benefit from the advantages of aid without rivalry and exludability. The public-goodnature of aid is a logical explanation for the deficiencies of the international aid regime, especially the suboptimal supply of aid and the free-riding of donors. The concept of aid as a public good raises the question whether there are any actors who could produce this global public good. The study analyses whether nongovernmental organizations are able to fill this gap in the international aid regime. The model is introduced through a case study: aid in Afghanistan in general, and the activities of the NGO Hungarian Baptist Aid in the country.

Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) classifications: F590, H410

Hivatkozások
  1. Ahmed, Shamima – Potter, David M. (2006): NGOs in International Politics. Kumarian Press, US
  2. Anheier, Helmut K. – Ben-Ner, Avner (2003): The Study of the Nonprofit Enterprise: Theories and Approaches. Plenum Publishers, New York
  3. Baron, David P. (2003): Private Politics. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 12, No. 1:31-66.
  4. Bebbington, Anthony (2005): Donor–NGO Relations and Representations of Livelihood in Nongovernmental Aid Chains. World Development, Vol. 33, No. 6:937-950.
  5. Beckwith, Sam (2012): The Militarisation of Aid in Afghanistan: Implications for Humanitarian Actors And the Way Ahead. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2167857
  6. Begg, David – Fischer, Stanley – Dornbusch, Rudiger (2005): Economics. McGraw-HillCompanies Degnbol-Martinussen, John – Engberg-Pedersen, Poul (2003): Aid: Understanding International Development Cooperation. London: Zed Books
  7. Edwards, Michael – Hulme, David (1996): Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development, Vol. 24, No. 6:961-973.
  8. Florini, Ann M. (Ed.) (2000). The third force: The rise of transnational civil society. The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, D.C.
  9. Frangonikolopoulos, Christos A. (2005): Non-governmental Organisations and Humanitarian Action: The Need for a Viable Change of Praxis and Ethos. Global Society, Vol. 19, No. 1.
  10. Hansmann, Henry B. (1987). Economics Theories of Nonprofit Organization. In: Powell, W. W. (ed.). The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  11. Kaul, Inge – Grunberg, Isabelle – Stern, Marc A. ed. (1999): Global Public Goods, International Cooperation in the 21st Century. Published for the UNDP. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  12. Keck, Margareth. E. – Sikkink, Kathryn (1998): Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
  13. Mathew, Jessica T. (1997): Power Shift. Foreign Affairs, Jan-Feb.
  14. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark (2005): A Joint Evaluation. Humanitarian and Reconstruction Assistance to Afghanistan, 2001-2005, from Denmark, Ireland, The Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom. - http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/54/56/35559322.pdf - download: 17.01.2012
  15. Oakley, Peter (1999): The Danish NGO Impact Study. A Review of Danish NGO Activities in Developing Countries. Danida
  16. Reimann, Kim D. (2006): A View from the Top: International Politics, Norms and the Worldwide Growth of NGOs. International Studies Quarterly (2006) 50:45–67.
  17. Samuelson, Paul A. (1954): The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics 36(4):387-389.
  18. Sasser, E., Prakash, A., Cashore, B., & Auld, G. (2006). Direct targeting as NGO political strategy: Examining private authority regimes in the forestry sector. Business and Politics, Vol. 8:1–32.
  19. Stiglitz, Joseph E. – Walsh, Carl E. (2002): Economics. W.W. Norton & Company
  20. UNCTAD (2012): World Investment Report 2012. http://www.unctad-docs.org/files/UNCTADWIR2012-Full-en.pdf - download: 17.11.2012
  21. Waisová, Šárka (2008): Post-war Reconstruction in Afghanistan and the Changing NGO-Government Relationship. The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 3.
  22. Waldman, Ronald – Strong, Lesley – Wali, Abdul (2006): Afghanistan’s Health System Since2001: Condition Improved, Prognosis Cautiously Optimistic. Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, Brieging Paper Series
  23. Walker, Peter – Maxwell, Daniel (2009): Shaping the Humanitarian World, Routledge
  24. Wapner, P. (1995). Politics without borders: Environmental activism and world civic politics. World Politics, Vol. 47:311–340.
  25. Weisbrod, Burton A. (1977): The Voluntary Nonprofit Sector. Lexington: Lexington Books
  26. Witter, Sophie (2012): Health financing in fragile and post-conflict states: What do we know and what are the gaps? Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 75, No. 12:2370-2377.
  27. Websites: Introduction to ECOSOC Consultative Status - http://esango.un.org/paperless/Web?page=static&content=intro – download: 28. 06. 2012
  28. List of non-governmental organizations in consultative status - http://csonet.org/conte