Papers

Corporate tax - a new paradigm is needed - I.: Income tax versus value-added tax

Published:
2020-12-14
Author
View
Keywords
License

Copyright (c) 2020 László Török

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Torok, L. (2020). Corporate tax - a new paradigm is needed - I.: Income tax versus value-added tax. Competitio, 19(1-2), 26-47. https://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2020/1-2/3
Abstract

Since the existence of the corporate tax institution, it has been a difficult task to determine the exact corporate tax base. As long as states are as large as possible, taxpayers, on the other hand, are interested in the smallest possible tax base. National and supranational rules for determining the tax base are changing with unrealistic frequency. It is almost impossible to enforce them, so conflicts between countries and between companies and tax administrations over corporate tax payable seem to be perpetuating. With the rise of trans- and multinational corporations, aggressive corporate tax planning and covert tax avoidance have also emerged. National governments are trying to prevent this with bilateral and multilateral treaties. Still, the verdicts of the recently revealed multi-billion euro/dollar corporate tax cases prove that they do not have a deterrent effect, meaning that the measures taken so far are far from sufficient to prevent them. In my research hypothesis, I argue that the corporate tax system's current form is unsustainable at both national and global levels due to its intricate design and manipulability and its high macro- and micro-level implicit costs. I will then propose a new value-added tax and tax rate to compensate for the loss of government revenue due to the abolition of corporate tax in an equivalent and essentially clear way. After that, I tested the proposed new type of tax based on the European Union countries' value-added data. Finally, I present the new global tax's territorial principle to replace corporate tax and its contribution to national public burden-bearing.

Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) codes: C53, E62, H24, K34

References
  1. Avi-Yonah, R. S. (2004): Corporations, Society and the State: A defense of the corporate tax, Virginia Law Review, Volume 90 September 2004, Number 5, pp. 1193-1255.
  2. Artner Annamária (2016): Egyenlőtlen fejlődés és felzárkózás, Tér és Társadalom 30. évf.,3. szám, 2016, pp 113-117, doi:10.17649/TET.30.3.2804
  3. Auerbach, A.- Devereux M. P.- Keen, M.- Vella, J. (2017): Destination-based cash flow tax, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation, https://eml.berkeley.edu/~auerbach/CBTWP1701.pdf, Letöltve: 2020.05.27.
  4. Bakos Péter - Bíró Anikó - Elek Péter- Scharle Ágota (2008): A magyar adórendszer hatékonysága, ELTE, Társadalomtudományi Kar, https://tatk.elte.hu/file/21_fuzet_final_pdf.pdf, Letöltve: 2020.03.11.
  5. Brill, A.–Hassett, K. A. (2007): Revenue-maximizing corporate income taxes: the Laffercurve in OECD countries, AEI Working Paper, No. 137.
  6. Clausing, K. (2007): Corporate tax revenues in OECD countries, International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 14. No. 2. pp 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-7983-2, Letöltve: 2020.03.12.
  7. Deák András (2018): „Válság vagy trend? : Az EU-orosz kapcsolatok a pénzügyi válság után, In: Éltető, A. - Szijártó, N. (ed.) Változó Európa a változó világban, Világgazdasági Intézet, pp. 267-295., https://doi.org/10.14267/phd.2016019
  8. Desai, M. A. – Dharmapala, D. (2018): Revisiting the uneasy case for corporate taxation in an uneasyworld, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329795266_Revisiting_the_uneasy_case_for_corporate_taxation_in_an_uneasy_world, DOI: 10.5871/jba/006s1.247,
  9. Davis C. (2012): Reforming the State Corporate Income Tax, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256029742_Reforming_the_State_Corporate_Income_Tax, Letöltve:2020.03.16.
  10. Dwenger, N.–Steiner, V. (2012): Profit taxation and the elasticity of the corporate income tax base: evidence from German corporate tax return data. National Tax Journal, 65. No. 1. pp. 117–150.
  11. Európai Bizottság (2016): Az adóelkerülés elleni irányelv, https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/business/company-tax/anti-tax-avoidance-package/anti-tax-avoidance-directive_en, Letöltve: 2020.05.26.
  12. Elek Péter –Lőrincz László (2015): Az effektív társasági adókulcs rugalmassága Magyarországon a 2009–2011 közötti adókulcscsökkentés alapján, Közgazdasági Szemle, LXII. évf., 2015. január pp 27–47.
  13. Európai Bizottság (2017): Az agresszív adótervezés visszaszorítása, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/file_import/european-semester_thematic-factsheet_curbing-agressive-tax-planning_hu.pdf, Letöltve: 2020.03.19.
  14. Európai Parlament (2019). Általános adópolitika, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/hu/sheet/92/altalanos-adopolitika, Letöltve: 2020.03.23.
  15. Institute of World Economics (2014): Adóelkerülés vagy adóoptimalizálás, https://vilaggazdasagi.blog.hu/2014/11/06/adoelkerules_vagy_adooptimalizalas_a_vallalati_jovedelemado_a_nemzetkozi_es_europai_vitakban, Letöltve: 2020.03.30.
  16. Jansky, P. (2019): Effective Tax Rates of Multinational Enterprises in the EU, https://www.greens-efa.eu/files/doc/docs/356b0cd66f625b24e7407b50432bf54d.pdf, Letöltve: 2020.03.31.
  17. Kopint-Tárki (2007). Az adóbázis szélesítésének nemzetközi tapasztalatai, Munkaanyag, pp 1-60.
  18. Lampreave, P. (2011): Fiscal Competitiveness Versus Harmful Tax Competition in the European Union, Bulletin for international taxation. - Amsterdam. - Vol. 65 (2011), no. 6; 17 p, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1932257
  19. Mooij, R. A. de–Ederveen, S. (2008): Corporate tax elasticities: a reader’s guide to empirical findings, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 24. No. 4. pp 680–697.
  20. Nobilis Benedek - Svraka András (2014): Megoldások a tőkenyereség adózásából fakadó torzítások mérséklésére és a magyar kisvállalati adó, Köz-Gazdaság, Tudományos füzetek, 9. évf., 4. sz., pp 81-97.
  21. OECD (2019): Secretariat Proposal for a “Unified Approach” under Pillar One, Public consultation document, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/public-consultation-document-secretariat-proposal-unified-approach-pillar-one.pdf, Letöltve: 2020.04.01.
  22. Péteri Gábor (2015): Helyi adózás: a szükséges rossz? https://kozjavak.hu/helyi-adozas-szukseges-rossz, https://doi.org/10.21867/kjk/2015.2.8,
  23. Tørsløv, T. R.- Wier, L.S. – Zucman, G. (2018): The missing profits of nations, Working Paper 24701, Online: http://www.nber.org/papers/w24701, https://doi.org/10.3386/w24701,
  24. UNCTAD (2013): World investment report, UN, New York, Geneva, https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2013_en.pdf, Letöltve: 2020. 04.06.
  25. UNU-WIDER (2017): Global distribution of revenue loss from tax avoidance, WIDER Working Paper 2017/55, https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/wp2017-55. pdf, Letöltve: 2020. 04.07.
  26. Vance, L. M. (2016): Abolish the Corporate Income Tax, https://www.fff.org/explore-freedom/article/abolish-corporate-income-tax/, Letöltve: 2020.04.08.