Papers

The Roots of Euroscepticism in Hungary.: Economic Policy and Perceptions of the European Union in the Crisis

Published:
2013-06-17
Author
View
Keywords
How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Martin, J. P. (2013). The Roots of Euroscepticism in Hungary.: Economic Policy and Perceptions of the European Union in the Crisis. Competitio, 12(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2013/1/1
Abstract

The paper explores the relationships among three factors: economic policy, its evaluation, and perceptions of the European Union. It considers Hungary’s recent decade, primarily the years of the recent global financial and economic crisis. The analysis compares Hungary’s economic statistics and attitudes with those of other countries on the EU periphery. The main questions are the following: why and how Hungary has become a eurosceptic country? On what does the image of the EU (created in the population) depend? Is there any link between how the economic policy is being pursued on one hand, and the attitudes towards the EU, on the other? Is the evaluation of the national economy confirmed by the hard facts?

Journal of Economic Litterature (JEL) classifications: O520, Z130, P160

References
  1. Anderson, C. J. (1998): When in Doubt, Use Proxies. Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 31, No. 5:569–601. Best, H. – Higley, J. (eds.): Democratic Elitism: New Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives. Brill, Leiden–Boston:153–171.
  2. Böröcz József (2010): The European Union and Global Social Change. Routledge, London–New York.
  3. Carrubba, C. J. (2001): The Electoral Connection in European Union Politics. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 63, No. 1: 141–158.
  4. Darvas Zsolt (2012): The Euros Crisis: Then Roots but fewer Solutions. http://www.bruegel.org/publications/publication-detail/publication/755-the-euro-crisis-ten-roots-but-fewersolutions/
  5. Bruegel Institute, Brussels.Easton, D. (1967): A System Analysis of Political Life. John Wiley & Sons, London.EEAG (2013): The EEAG Report on the European Economy. CESifo, Munich. http://www.cesifo-group.de/ifoHome/policy/EEAG-Report/Archive/EEAG_Report_2013/eeag_2013_report.html
  6. Elster, J. (1995): A társadalom fogaskerekei. Osiris, Budapest.
  7. Eurobarometer (1993): Az Európai Unióval kapcsolatos közvélemény-kutatások http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/topics/euro_en.htm
  8. Fligstein, N. – Mara-Drita, I. (1996): How to make a market: Reflections on the Attempt to Create a Single Market in the European Union. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 102, No. 1:1–33.
  9. Fligstein, N. (2008): Euroclash. Oxford University Press, Oxford–New York.
  10. Follesdal, A. – Hix, S. (2006): Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 44, No. 3:533–562.
  11. Friedman, A. (2007): Perception: A Cognitive Sociological Approach. Conference Paper:1–23. http://sociology.rutgers.edu/DOCUMENTS/conf_papers/Friedman_Asia.pdf
  12. Gabel, M. (1998): Public Support for European Integration: An Empirical Test of Five Theories. The Journal of Politics, Vol. 60, No. 2:333–354.
  13. Göncz Borbála (2010): Perception of European Integration in Central and Eastern European countries. In: Füstös László – Guba László – Szalma Ivett (eds.): European Social Register 2010. Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest.
  14. Győrffy Dóra (2012): Bizalmatlanság és gazdaságpolitika. In: Muraközy László (szerk.): A bizalmatlanság hálójában. A magyar beteg. Corvina, Budapest:56–82.
  15. Haas, E. (1958): The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economical Factors. Stevens, London.
  16. Hodgon, G. (2006) What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 40, No. 1:1–25.
  17. Hooghe, L. – Marks, G. (2001): Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham–Boulder–New York–Oxford, Kindle Edition.
  18. Hooghe, L. – Marks, G. (2005): Calculation, Community and Cues. European Union Politics, Vol. 6, No. 4:419–443.
  19. Hooghe, L. – Marks, G. (2008): Postfunctionalis Theory of European Integration. British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 39, No. 1:1–23.
  20. Inglehart, R. (1970): Cognitive Mobilization and European Identity. Comparative Politics, Vol. 3, No. 1:45–70.
  21. Inglehart, R. (1990): Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  22. Kahnemann, D. (2011): Thinking Fast and Slow. Farra Straus & Giroux, New York, Kindle Edition.
  23. Kovács Árpád (2013): A magyar gazdaság 2013-ban. PPT-prezentáció. http://www.mkt.hu/docs/2013-04-06-00-06-04-Kovacs_Arpad.pdf
  24. Laidi, Z. (2005). La norme sans la force. Sciences Po, Paris.
  25. Lengyel György – Blaskó Zsuzsa (2002): Kik félnek az európai integrációtól? In: Társadalmi riport 2002. Tárki, Budapest:404–420.
  26. Lengyel György (szerk.) (2008): A magyar politikai és gazdasági elit EU-képe. Új Mandátum Könyvkiadó, Budapest.
  27. Lengyel György – Göncz Borbála (2010): A magyar EU-tagság a közvéleményben. In: Társadalmi Riport 2010. Tárki, Budapest:527–548.
  28. Lengyel György – Ilonszki Gabriella (2010): Hungary: Between Consolidated and Simulated Democracy. In: Lannoo, K. (2013): The Europe barometer points to stromy whether. CEPS, Brussels. http://www.ceps.be/book/europebarometer-points-stormy-weather
  29. Manners, I. (2002): Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 40, No. 2:235-258.
  30. McGovern, G. – Wallace, G. (1996): Towards a European Regulatory State. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 3, No. 4: 560–576.
  31. Moravcsik, A. (1991): Negotiating the Single Market Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community. International Organization, Vol. 45, No. 1:19–56.
  32. Muraközy László (2012): A bizalmatlanságok rendszere. In: Muraközy László (szerk.): A bizalmatlanság hálójában. A magyar beteg. Corvina, Budapest:7–36.
  33. Münch, R. (2000). Nemzetállam, regionalizmus és világtársadalom. In: Lengyel György – Nagy Beáta (szerk.): Az európai integráció társadalmi feltételei és hatásai. Aula, Budapest:71–98.
  34. Németh Anita – Tóth Szabolcs (2012): Pillanatfelvétel az európai gazdasági kormányzás reformjáról. Európai Tükör, Vol. 17, No. 2:24–38.
  35. North, D. (1990): Institutions and the Performance of Economies Over Time. E-book, saját letöltés. Megtalálható még: Ménard, C.
  36. – Shirley, M. (eds.) (2008): Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Springer, Berlin:21–30.
  37. North, D. (1991): Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 1:97–112.
  38. North, D. (2005): Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  39. Political Capital (2013): Nemzeti és/vagy politikai identitás? Tanulmány:1–31.
  40. Rosta Miklós (2012): Innováció, adaptáció és imitáció. Aula, Budapest:139–151.
  41. Scharpf, F. (1988): The Joint Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration. Public Administration, Vol. 66, No. 3: 239–278.
  42. Serricchio, F. – Tsakatika, M. – Quaglia, L. (2013): Euroscepticism and the Global Financial Crisis. Journal Of Common Market Studies, Vol. 51, No. 1:51–64.
  43. Sólyom László (2013): A hatalommegosztás vége. Népszabadság, március 11.
  44. Szczerbiak, A. – Taggart, P. (2008): Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism – Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives Vol. 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford.