Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) anatomical, physiological, biochemical and production responses to drought stress - A mini-review essay

July 21, 2021

Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Horticultural Science

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Massimi, M. (2021). Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) anatomical, physiological, biochemical and production responses to drought stress - A mini-review essay. International Journal of Horticultural Science, 27, 40-45.

The cultivated plant climate association in agricultural yields is getting expanded consideration with regards to changing climatic conditions. Abiotic stressors can lead to morpho-anatomical, physiological, and biochemical alterations in harvests, resulting in a significant loss of profit. A comprehension of ecological elements and their communication with physiological cycles is critical for improving agricultural practices. Drought stress is among the main natural factor affecting plant development, growth, and yield measures. Assessing the impact of environmental change and atmospheric variability on tomato crop output will require a thorough understanding of this stress element. The physiology, development, improvement, yield, and quality of the tomato crop are all affected by dry season stress. This mini-review essay presents the most prominent features about the effects of drought stress on tomato crop plant physiology and production, with specific highlighting for the complex relationship between drought stress, and nutrients uptake.

  1. Amacher, J.K., Koenig, R., Kitchen, B. (2000): Salinity and Plant Tolerance, Archived USU Extension Publications, Utah State University.
  2. Brouwer, C, Heibloem M. (1986): Crop Water Needs, Irrigation Water Management: Irrigation Water Needs, Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome.
  3. Chatterjee, A., Solankey, S. (2015): Functional Physiology in Drought Tolerance of Vegetable Crops: An Approach to Mitigate Climate Change Impact. In: Climate Dynamics in Horticultural Science, Principles and Applications; Choudhary, M.L., Patel, V.B., Siddiqui, M.W., Mahdi, S.S., eds. Apple Academic Press: Oakville, ON, Canada; CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1, 149–171.
  4. Copeland, L, McDonald, M.B. (1995): Principles of Seed Science and Technology. 3rd edition. Chapman and Hall: New York. USA.
  5. Department of Statistics. (2017): Survey. Agriculture. DOS website, Government of Jordan.
  6. Dunlop, J.R., Binzel, M.L. (1996): NaCl Reduces Indole Acetic Acid Levels in the Roots of Tomato Plants Independent of Stress Induced Abscisic Acid. Plant Physiology, 112, 379–384.
  7. Favati, F., Lovelli, S., Galgano, F., Miccolis, V., Di Tommaso, T., Candido, V. (2009): Processing Tomato Quality as Affected by Irrigation Scheduling, Scientia Horticulturae 122, 562–571. 2009.06.026
  8. Helyes, L. (1991): A zöldségnövények vízellátottságának és öntözési igényének meghatározása a lombhőmérséklettel. Hungary: Agricultural Unversity of Gödöllő, Gödöllő, Hungary, 123. PhD thesis (In Hungarian).
  9. Helyes, L. (1990): Relations Among the Water Supply, Foliage Temperature and the Yield of Tomato. Acta Hortic, 277, 115–122. 277.12
  10. Helyes, L., Szuvandzsiev, P., Neményi, A., Pék, Z., Lugasi, A. (2013): Different Water Supply and Stomatal Conductance Correlates with Yield Quantity and Quality Parameters. Acta Hortic, 971, 119–125. 2013.971.13
  11. Khan, SH., Khan, A., Litaf, U., Shah, AS., Khan, M.A, Bilal, M., Ali, M.U. (2015): Effect of Drought Stress on Tomato cv. Bombino. Journal of Food Processing & Technology, 6: 465.
  12. Kim, T.H., Bohmer, M., Nishilmura, N., Schorder, J.I. (2010): Guard Cell Signal Transduction Network: Advances in Understanding Abscisic Acid, CO2 and Ca+2 Signalling. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 61:561–569.
  13. Larcher W. (2003): Physiological Plant Ecology, 4th edition. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
  14. Maggio, A., Barbieri, G., De Raimondi, G., Pascale, S. (2010): Contrasting Effects of GA3 Treatments on Tomato Plants Exposed to Increasing Salinity. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 29, 63–72.
  15. Massimi, M. (2018): Impact of Seed Size on Seeds Viability, Vigor and Storability of Hordeum vulgare (L.). Agricultural Science Digest, 38, 62-64.
  16. Massimi, M, Al-Bdour, A. (2018): A Short Scientific Note on the Horticultural Crops Optimum Planting Dates in Jordan, Egyptian Journal of Horticulture, 45, 337-340.,
  17. Massimi, M., Anandhi, A., Haseeb, M., Lorenzo, A. (2018 a): Modeling the Hybrid Seedling Performance of Forage Sorghum and Silage Corn Under Jordan Irrigation Conditions, Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 52, 71-75.,
  18. Massimi, M., Bader, N., Khamish, KH., Al-S’uod, A. (2018 b): Economic Analysis for Forage Agronomic Crops Grown Using Treated Wastewater in Kherbeh Als-Samra Region, Jordan, International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 22 (4), 1-9.
  19. Nahar, K., Gretzmacher, R. (2002): Effect of Water Stress on Nutrient Uptake, Yield and Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Under Subtropical Conditions. Die Bodenkultur 53, 45–51.
  20. Nemeskéri, E., Helyes, L. (2019): Review: Physiological Responses of Selected Vegetable Crop Species to Water Stress. Agronomy, 9, 447; 9080447. 1-19.
  21. Nemeskéri, E., Neményi, A., Bőcs, A., Pék, Z., Helyes, L. (2019): Physiological Factors and their Relationship with the Productivity of Processing Tomato under Different Water Supplies. Water, 11, 586.
  22. Németh, S.Z., Ehret-Berczi, I. (2014): The Hungarian Horticultural Sector: Economic Analysis of Tomato Greenhouse Farms. Acta Hortic. 1041, 307-310
  23. Patane, C., Cosentino, S., Cosentino, S. (2010): Effects of Soil Water Deficit on Yield and Quality of Processing Tomato Under a Mediterranean Climate. Agricultural Water Management, 97, 131–138. 2009.08.021
  24. Pervez, M.A., Ayub, C.M., Khan, H.A., Shahid, M.A., Ashraf, I. (2009): Effect of Drought Stress on Growth, Yield and Seed Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 46, 174-178.
  25. Pillay, I., Beyl, C. (1990): Early Responses of Drought Resistant and Susceptible Tomato Plants Subjected to Water Stress. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 9, 213–219.
  26. Sing, S.K., Reddy, KR. (2011): Regulation of Photosynthesis, Fluorescence, Stomatal Conductance and Water-Use Efficiency of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] Under Drought. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 105, 40–50.
  27. Srinivasa Rao, N.K., Laxman, R.H., Shivashankara, K.S. (2016): Physiological and Morphological Responses of Horticultural Crops to Abiotic Stresses. In: Srinivasa Rao, N.K., Laxman, R.H., Shivashankara, K.S., eds. (2016): Abiotic Stress Physiology of Horticultural Crops,
  28. Strey, R. (2020): PLANTIX Application, 3.3.0, 2020. Progressive Environmental & Agricultural Technologies (PEAT GMBH), Germany (Retrieved 01 October 2020).
  29. Upreti, K.K., Sharma, M. (2016): Role of Plant Growth Regulators in Abiotic Stress Tolerance. In: Srinivasa Rao, N.K., Laxman, R.H., Shivashankara, K.S., eds. (2016): Abiotic Stress Physiology of Horticultural Crops,
  30. Wigley, T., MAGICC/SCENGEN 5.3 Software. (2008): In: Massimi, M., Bader, N., Khamish, K.H., Al-S’uod, A., (2018): Economic Analysis for Forage Agronomic Crops Grown Using Treated Wastewater in Kherbeh Als-Samra Region, Jordan. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 22 (4), 1-9.
  31. Zhou, R., Kong, L., Wu, Z., Rosenqvist, E., Wang, Y., Zhao, L., Zhao, T., Ottosen, C-O. (2019): Physiological Response of Tomatoes at Drought, Heat and Their Combination Followed by Recovery. Physiologia Plantarum, 165, 144–154.
  32. Zhou, R., Yu, X., Ottosen, C-O., Rosenqvist, E., Zhao, L., Wang, Y., Yu,W., Zhao, T., Wu, Z. (2017): Drought Stress had a Predominant Effect Over Heat Stress on Three Tomato Cultivars Subjected to Combined Stress. B M C Plant Biology, 17, [24].