Papers

New tendencies in urban development – The possibilities provided by walkable cities

Published:
2017-12-15
Authors
View
Keywords
How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Szucs, P., Lukovics, M., & Kezy, B. (2017). New tendencies in urban development – The possibilities provided by walkable cities. Competitio, 16(2), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2017/2/2
Abstract

Nowadays, the so-called disadvantages of urbanization – the noise, air pollution, overcrowding – receive more and more focus in cities. Vehicles require increasing space to themselves in cities which decrease the quality of living space people need, which is harmful from the point of view of the society and the economy, as well. Sustainable urban mobility can be a solution, which has two elements: the well-known environmentally friendly public transportation and the less known walkability. The latter comes to the front in the course of the preparation of sustainable city development strategies, nevertheless walkability measurements have been taken principally in USA’s and Western-Europe’s big cities. In our paper we search for the answer of the question, how the concept of walkability is interpretable in middle-sized European cities and what kind of city development potentials do all these have. In the course of our research
primary surveys were conducted in Szeged and Valencia to investigate walkability and its improvement opportunities. Our survey verified that the concept of walkability could be a useful city development tool even in middle-sized cities.

Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) code: R42

References
Benfield, F. K. (2014): How Walkable Communities Are Good for Us. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/f-kaid-benfield/how-walkable-communities_b_6014028. html, Letöltve: 2016. 09. 07.
Benfield, F. K. (2016): It’s a Trend: More Businesses Are Choosing Downtowns and Walkable Locations. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/f-kaid-benfield/its-atrend- more-business_b_7608218.html, Letöltve: 2016. 09. 06.
Cohen, B. (2006): Urbanization in developing countries: Current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability. Technology in Society, Vol. 28, No. 1–2:63–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.005
Eidmann, J. – Long, A. – Noomah, C. – Ury, E. (2011): A walkability study of North Adams, Massachusetts. Berkshire Regional Planning Commission, Pittsfield.
Enyedi György (2012): Városi világ. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
Florida, R. (2002): The Rise of the Creative Class. Basic Books.
Florida, R. (2010): America’s Most Walkable Cities. Atlantic Media Company, Washington.
Florida, R. (2011): Why Walkable Cities Aren’t Always the Ones You’d Think. Atlantic Media Company, Washington.
Frank, L. – Chapman, J. – Kershaw, S. – Kavage, S. (2012): City and Regional Residential Preference Survey Results for Toronto and Vencouver: A CLASP Final Report. Toronto Public Health, Toronto.
Gehl, J. – Svarre, B. (2013): How to study public life. IslandPress, Washington, Covelo, London. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-525-0
Giles-Corti, B. – Foster, S. – Shilton, T. – Falconer, R. (2010): The co-benefits for health of investing in active transportation. New South Wales Public Health Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 5–6:122–127. https://doi.org/10.1071/NB10027
Giles-Corti, B. – Mavoa, S. – Eagleson, S. – Davern, M. – Roberts, R. – Badland, H. (2014): Transport walkability index: Melbourne. McCaughey VicHealth Centre for Community Wellbeing, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
Hawkins, T. R. – Singh, B. – Majeau-Bettez, G. – Hammer Stromman, A. (2012): Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles. Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 17, No. 1:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00532.x
Leinberger, C. B. – Lynch, P. (2014): Foot Traffic Ahead: Ranking Walkable Urbanism in America’s Largest Metros. The George Washington University School of Business, Washington.
Lengyel Imre (2010): Regionális gazdaságfejlesztés: versenyképesség, alulról szerveződés, klaszterek. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest
Lengyel Imre – Rechnitzer János (2004): Regionális gazdaságtan. Dialóg Campus, Pécs.
MARC (1998): Creating Walkable Communities. Mid-America Regional Council, Kansas City.
Péter Szabolcs (2008): Az életmód szerepe az elhízás megelőzésében. Doktori értekezés. Semmelweis Egyetem, Budapest.
Rechnitzer János (2007): Az európai regionális politika és városfejlődés. Magyar Tudomány, Vol. 178, No. 6:692–703.
Sadorsky, P. (2014): The effects of urbanization on CO2 emissions in emerging countries. Energy Economics, Vol. 41, No. 1:147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.11.007
Southworth, M. (2005): Designing the Walkable City. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 131, No. 4:246–257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246)
Torrey, B. B. (2004): Urbanization: An Environmental Force to Be Reckoned With. Population Reference Bureau, Washington.
Vas Zsófia – Lengyel Imre – Szakálné Kanó Izabella (2015): Regionális klaszterek és agglomerációs előnyök: feldolgozóipar a magyar városrégiókban. Tér és Társadalom, Vol. 29, No. 3:49–72.
Wang, Q. – Santini, D. L. (1993): Magnitude and Value of Electric Vehicle Emissions Reductions for Six Driving Cycles in Four U.S. Cities with Varying Air Quality Problems. Center for Transportation Research, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne.
WHO (2016): Obesity and Overwight. World Health Organization, Geneve. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/, Letöltve: 2017. 02. 18.