dEjournals Nyitóoldal
Competitio
Online megjelent Aktuális Legtöbbet olvasott Archívum Keresés
Regisztráció Bejelentkezés

Competitio

Évf. 11 szám 1 (2012)
Kutatás közben

Állampolgári Érdek Mutató: Javaslat az új közszolgálati menedzsment eredményességének mérésére

Megjelent:
June 18, 2012
DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2012/1/8
Szerző
Rosta Miklós
Megtekintés
Kulcsszavak
Új Közszolgálati Menedzsment intézményi közgazdaságtan közösségi döntések elmélete Állampolgári Érdek Mutató
How To Cite
Kiválasztott formátum: APA
Rosta, M. (2012). Állampolgári Érdek Mutató: Javaslat az új közszolgálati menedzsment eredményességének mérésére. Competitio, 11(1), 117-131. https://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2012/1/8
Absztrakt

A jelen tanulmány egy olyan mutatót kíván bevezetni, amellyel lehetővé válik az új közszolgálati menedzsment átfogó, makroszintű eredményességének értékelése. A szerző amutató megalkotása során a közösségi döntések elméletéből indul ki, mivel az új közszolgálati menedzsment politikaelméleti és
közgazdaság-tudományi alapjai szorosan köthetőek ezen elmélethez. A megalkotott kompozit indexet nem csak elméletben mutatja be, hanem tartalmilag és módszertanilag is ismerteti.

Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: H83, D70, D23

Hivatkozások
  1. Anderson, W. – Wallace, M. S. – Warner, J. T. (1986): Government Spending and Taxation: What Causes What. Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 52, No. 3:630–639.
  2. Barzelay, M. (2001): The New Public Management. Improving Research and Policy Dialogue. University of California Press, Berkeley
  3. Bjørnskov, C. – Dreher, A. – Fischer, J. A. V. (2007): The bigger the better? Evidence of the effect of government size on life satisfaction around the world. Public Choice, Vol. 130, No. 3–4:267–292.
  4. Blankart, C. B. – Koester, G. B. (2006): Political Economics versus Public Choice. Kyklos, Vol. 59, No. 2:171–200.
  5. Borins, S. (2002): New Public Management, North American style. In: McLaughlin, K. – Osborne, S. P. – Ferlie, E. (eds.): New public management: current trends and future prospects. Routledge, New York:181–194.
  6. Boston, J.(2000): The challenge of evaluating systemic change: the case of public management reform. International Public Management Journal, Volume 3, Issue 1, January:23-46.
  7. Boston, J. (2011): Basic NPM Ideas and their Development. In: Christensen, T. – Lægreid, P (eds.): The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Farnham:17–32.
  8. Bouckaert, G. – Nemec, J., – Nakrošis, V., – Hajnal, G., – Tõnnisson, K. (2009): Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe. NISPAcee Press, Bratislava
  9. Bouckaert, G. – Halligan, J. (2007): Comparing Performance across Public Sectors. Working Paper, Paper for presentation to Study Group on Performance in the Public Sector. Conference of European Group of Public Administration, Madrid, 19–22 September 2007, Downloaded: http://webh01.ua.ac.be/pubsector/madrid/papers/paper%20Bouckaert%20Halligan.doc, Accessed: 2011.06.20.
  10. Buchanan, J. M. (1954): Social Choice, Democracy, and Free Markets. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 62, No. 2:114–123.
  11. Buchanan, J. M. (2003): Public Choice: The Origins and Development of a Research Program. http://www.pubchoicesoc.org/about_pc.php, Letöltve: 2011.08.28.
  12. Callahan, K. (2007): Elements of Effective Governance Measurement, Accountability and Participation. Taylor & Francis, New York.
  13. Cantarero, D. – Pascual, M. (2008): Analysing the impact of fiscal decentralization on health outcomes: empirical evidence from Spain. Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 15, No. 2:109–111.
  14. Christensen, T. – Lægreid, P. (2002): New Public Management: Puzzles of Democracy and the Influence of Citizens. Syposium on Accountability, Publicity & Transparency. The Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 10, No. 3:267–295.
  15. Christensen, T. – Lægreid, P. (2005): Agencification and regulatory reforms. Working Paper. Paper prepared for the SCANCOR/SOG workshop on ”Automization of the state: From integrated administrative models to single purpose organizations”. Standford University, 2005.04.1–2., http://soc.kuleuven.be/io/cost/pub/paper/AgencificationRegulatioryReforms_Final21021.pdf Letöltve: 2011.06.21.
  16. Christiaens, J. – Rommel, J. (2008): Accrual Accounting Reforms: Only for Businesslike (Parts of) Governments. Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 24, No. 1:59–75.
  17. Denhardt, R. B. – Denhardt, J. V. (2000): The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering. Public Administration Review, Vol. 60, No. 6:549–559.
  18. Dunleavy, P. (1986): Explaining the privatization boom: public choice versus radical approaches. Public Administration, Vol. 64, No. 1:13–34.
  19. Dunleavy, P. et al (2005): New Public Management is dead – long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 16, No. 1:467–494.
  20. Eliassen, K. A – Sitter, N. (2008): Understanding Public Management. SAGE Publications Ltd, London.
  21. Elola, J. – Daponte, A. – Navarr, V. (1995): Health Indicators and the Organization of Health Care Systems in Western Europe. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 85, No. 10:1397–1401.
  22. Ferlie, E. – Steane, P. (2002): Changing Developments in NPM. International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 25, No. 12:1459–1469.
  23. Grüning, G. (2001): Origin and theoretical basis of new public management. International Public Management Journal, Vol. 4, No. 1:1–25.
  24. Gualmini, E. (2008): Restructuring Weberian Bureaucracy: Comparing Managerial Reforms in Europe and the United States. Public Administration, Vol. 86, No. 1:75–94.
  25. Hajnal, György (2004): Igazgatási kultúra és New Public Management reformok egy összehasonlító esettanulmány tükrében. PhD disszertáció. Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem, Budapest. http://phd.lib.unicorvinus.hu/174/1/hajnal_gyorgy.pdf, Letöltve: 2012.03.14.
  26. Häikiö, L. (2010): The Diversity of Citizenship and Democracy in Local Public Management Reform. Public Management Review, Vol. 12, No. 3:363–384.
  27. Hood, C. (1991): A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, Vol. 69, No. 1:3–19.
  28. Hood, C. (1995): The „New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society. Vol. 20, No. 2–3:93–109.
  29. Hughes, O. (2008): What is, or was, New Public Management? Paper presented at the 12th Annual Meeting of the International Research Society of Public Management, Brisbane, 27 March 2008.
  30. Jones, L. R. – Kettl, D. F. (2003): Assessing Public Management Reform in an International Context. International Public Management Review, Vol. 4, No. 1:1–18.
  31. Kuhlmann, S. (2010): Performance Measurement in European local governments: a comparative analysis of reform experiences in Great Britain, France, Sweden and Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 76, No. 2:331–345.
  32. Lapsley, I. (2009): New Public Management: The cruellest Invention of the Human Spirit? Abacus, Vol. 4, No. 1:1–21.
  33. Liu, K. – Moon, M. (1992): International infant mortality rankings: A look behind the numbers. Health Care Financing Review, Vol. 13, No. 4:105–119.
  34. Lupi, A. (2010): Tax revenue in the European Union. Eurostat Statistics in Focus. 23/2010, European Communities, Brussels. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-10-023/EN/KSSF-10-023-EN.PDF, Letöltve: 2012.03.14.
  35. Manning, N. – Shepherd, G. –Blum, J. – Laudares, H. (2008): Public Management Reform: should Latin America learn from the OECD? OECD:1–35, http://blog-pfm.imf.org/files/oecd-lac-publicmanagement-reforms---2008---final-1.pdf, Letöltve: 2012.03.14.
  36. Meyer-Sahling, J-H. (2009): Sustainability of Civil Service Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe five years after EU Accession. Sigma paper No. 44, OECD & EU. http://www.sigmaweb.org/document/32/0,3343,en_33638100_34612958_38073440_1_1_1_1,00.html, Letöltve: 2010.07.20.
  37. Nemec, J. (2010): New Public Management and its Implementation in CEE: What Do we Know and where Do we Go? NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Vol. 3, No. 1:31–52.
  38. OECD (2002): Distributed Public Governance Agencies, Authorities and other Government Bodies. OECD, Paris.
  39. OECD (2004): Towards High-Performing Health Systems. The OECD Health Project. OEDC Publishing, Paris.
  40. OECD (2009): Revenue Statistics 1965–2008. Special Feature: Changes to the Guidelines for Attributing Revenues to Levels of Government. OECD Publishing, Paris. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/taxation/revenue-statistics-2009_rev_stats-2009-en-fr Letöltve: 2012.03.14.
  41. OECD (2010): Better Regulation in Europe: Germany. OECD, Wien. www.sourceoecd.org/governance/9789264085879 Letöltve: 2011.08.30.
  42. OECD (2010/a): OECD Factbook Statistics 2010: Country Indicators. OECD Factbook Statistics (database). http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/data-00378-en Letöltve: 2011.07.27.
  43. OECD (2010/b): OECD Economic Outlook No. 86. OECD Economic Outlook: Statistics and Projections database. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/data-00370-en Letöltve: 2011.07.28.
  44. Olson, M. (1997): A kollektív cselekvés logikája. Közjavak és csoportelmélet. Osiris Kiadó, Budapest.
  45. Pollitt, C. – Bouckaert, G. (2004): Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis. Second Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  46. Pollitt, C. – Summa, H. (1997): Trajectories of Reform: Public Management Change in Four Countries. Public Money & Management, Vol. 17, No. 1:7–18.
  47. Pollitt, C. – van Thiel, S. – Homburg, V. (eds.) (2007): New Public Management in Europe. Adaptation and Alternatives. Palgrave Macmillan Publishing, New York.
  48. Pollitt, C. (2002): The New Public Management in international perspective. An analysis of impacts and effects. In: McLaughlin, K. – Osborne, S. P. – Ferlie, E. (eds.): New public management: current trends and future prospects. Routledge, New York:274–292.
  49. Pollitt, C. et al (2001): Agency Fever? Analysis of an International Policy Fashion. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, Vol. 3, No. 3:271–290.
  50. Poór, József et al (2009): Similarities and Differences of Human Resource Management in Private and Public Sector Organisations in the light of New Public Management in International Comparison. Acta Oeconomica, Vol. 59, No. 2:179–206.
  51. Pulpanova, L. (2006): Trends in government expenditure by function, 2000–2004. Eurostat Statistics in Focus. 11/2006, European Communities, Brussels. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KSNJ-06-011/EN/KS-NJ-06-011-EN.PDF Letöltve: 2011.07.27.
  52. Rodric, D. (1996): Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Working Paper No. 5537, NBER Working Paper Series, National Bereau of Economic Research, Cambrigde. http://www.nber.org/papers/w5537.pdf Letöltve: 2011.07.28.
  53. Sausgruber, R. – Tyran, J-R. (2005): Testing the Mill hypothesis of fiscal illusion. Public Choice, Vol. 122, No. 1–2:39–68.
  54. Schedler, K. – Proeller, I. (2002): The New Public Management. A perspective from mainland Europe. In: McLaughlin, K. – Osborne, S. P. – Ferlie, E. (eds.): New public management: current trends and future prospects. Routledge, New York:163–180.
  55. Schick, A. (1998): Why Most Developing Countries Should Not Try New Zealand’s Reforms. The World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 13, No. 1:123–131.
  56. Tanzi, V. – Schuknecht, L. (1997): Reconsidering the Fiscal Role of Government: The International Perspective. The American Economic Review, Vol. 87, No. 2:164–168.
  57. Torres, L. (2004): Trajectories in public administration reforms in European Continental countries. Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 63, No. 3:99–112.
  58. Tullock, G. (1971): Public Decisions as Public Goods. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 79, No. 4:913–918.
  59. UN és további szervezetek (2009): System of National Accounts 2008. UN / IMF / EU / OECD / The World Bank, New York. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/docs/SNA2008.pdf, Letöltve: 2011.07.28.
  60. UNDP (2009): Human Development Report 2009. Overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2009_EN_Complete.pdf, Letöltve: 2011.07.26.
  61. Van de Walle, S. – Hammerschmid, G. (2011): Coordinating for Cohesion in the Public Sector of the Future, Cocops Project Background Paper. Cocops Working Paper, No. 1:16.
  62. Wollmann, H. (2003): Evaluation in public-sector reform: Towards a ‘third wave’ of evaluation? In: Wollmann, H. (ed.): Evaluation in Public-Sector Reform. Concepts and Practice in International Perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham:1–11.
  63. Yamamura, E. (2011): Decomposition of the effect of government size on growth. Economics Letters, Vol. 112, No. 3:230–232.