Keresés

Publikált ez után
Publikált ez előtt

Keresési eredmények

  • Regéci „importáruk” Sárospatakon a 17. század végén
    5-21
    Megtekintések száma:
    1
    Sárospatak and Regéc used to be the centres of two neighbouring manors. During the 17th century, both were owned by the Rákóczi family, and as such, they played a role in Rákóczi’s War of Independence, which primarily meant economic burdens. The increased taxes mainly had a negative impact on the population of the Regéc manor. The topic of our investigation could be the analysis of these burdens, but we focused on the cooperation of the two manors. This hitherto neglected research direction can provide new aspects for the maintenance and operation of management and the economic system. What was the level of goods turnover? How much were these goods worth? What percentage of “imported” products accounted for the total income of the given product that year, that is, how big a deficit was there in farming in Sárospatak? What was the reason for this kind of cooperation? To answer our questions, we have used the accounts of the two estates. We are in the fortunate position that the ratios of the years 1711 and 1712 are available for both manors, which gives us the opportunity to compare: was the product sent from Regéc really recorded as the same amount in Patak? We apologize in advance, but there are many similar differences between the two documents, to which we will try to find answers in our study. However, the further accounts (from 1695, 1696, and 1701) are only related to the Regéc estate, so we can only rely on one-sided data about the goods delivered to Patak, and their quantity. Based on the sources used during our investigation, we were able to outline the Regéc “export” of the late 17th and early 18th centuries, its extent and reasons, which results can serve as a basis for further research regarding the economic cooperation of the neighbouring Rákóczi manors.
  • „Méltóságos Fejedelem egész udvarnépével edgyütt Szerencsen continuálván lakását” – A szerencsi uradalom a 17. század végén
    5-23
    Megtekintések száma:
    1
    In April 1695, Ferenc Rákóczi II. arrived to the territory of their Szerencs estate with his family: his wife, brother and brother-in-law. They enjoyed the hospitality of the estate for almost half a year. The visit had its antecedents. The prince spent the former year on a cruise in Italy, arriving back from which his brother welcomed him with bad news: their family estates were waiting to be taken over in a dilapidated state. After this impression, the young Rákóczi decided to visit all his family estates. Many of the surviving documents from the visit in 1695 come from the accounts of the neighbouring Regéc estate. This is because food had been sent to Szerencs several times. In our study, we try to reconstruct the said visit on the basis of these resources, asking the question why the economic assistance of the neighbouring Regéc was needed. To answer this, we would try to outline the history of the Szerencs manor, starting from its inception, focusing on the allodial economic system.
  • Draheim Lipót Vilmos birtokai
    34-42
    Megtekintések száma:
    1
    On April 15, 1685, Abaúj County sent a letter to Imre Thököly to draw the monarch’s attention to the contradictions and abuses of the lawsuit against Vilmos Draheim, and to propose the return of the estates unlawfully confiscated by the Chamber. The mediation of the county also contributed to the fact that Vilmos Draheim, the former prefect of the Spiš Chamber, was able to keep his cattle. However, it is not specified in any document what estates the Chamber confiscates, they are referred to only in a couple of sentences. As part of the life of the former prefect is obscured, it is only possible to reconstruct his estates and their size from the data and letter excerpts from 1682–93. This study undertakes just that, looking for answers to the questions on how Draheim was able to enrich his cattle during his work and how much wealth he left to his children when he died.
  • Egy 17. századi házasságtörés háttere és következményei
    84-94
    Megtekintések száma:
    0
    The Municipal Archives of Košice keeps the document containing the verdict of Judge István Csáky that reveals the story of the harassment of a noble woman in 1688. Klára Gatályi had been the wife of Vilmos Draheim, the former chamber prefect, and stood by him even during her arrest in 1685. Three years later, Klára Gatályi was arbitrarily imprisoned by the citizens of Košice. The charge: adultery. Although the text of the examined resource seems to be about the release of a woman of average importance who had been violated in her noble rights, and the self-righteousness of jury citizens in Košice, there is in fact a story in the background that cannot be called a general one. It is a story the event line of which had begun before 1685, and its aftermath could serve as the background to what happened in 1688. Focusing on these antecedents, the present study attempts to explore this part of Klára Gatályi's life and the events leading up to it.
  • Interjú Papp Klárával
    84-98
    Megtekintések száma:
    0
  • Zboró mezőváros társadalma a Rákóczi-korszakban – Család- és háztartásvizsgálat
    7-27
    Megtekintések száma:
    0
    In the 17th century, Zborov was not a market town with a long history, it acquired this title around 1670. We can therefore safely say that the development of the city was due to the Rákóczi family. Its members continuously developed Zborov, which development formed the basis of our study of Zborov's society. The purpose of our study is to answer questions such as how the population of the market town changed during the 17th century, how the proportion of serfs, squires, and skilled workers changed, and their financial situation. We extended the research to family and household research, which was made possible by the special detailedness of the 1688 urbarium concerning the estates of the royal branch. Therefore, our social investigation is complemented by questions such as what types of households we can talk about in contemporary Zborov. How were the households distributed according to household type and livestock?