dEjournals Home Page
International Journal of Horticultural Science
Current Author Guide Archives Search Submit Online Most Read
Register Login

International Journal of Horticultural Science

Vol. 28 (2022)
Articles

Pre-scaling up evaluation of banana technology under irrigation conditions in Abergelle District, Wag-himra Zone, Ethiopia

Published:
July 27, 2022
DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.31421/ijhs/28/2022/10787
Authors
A. Wubet,
N. Assefa,
A. Mihretu,
K. Ayen
View
Keywords
‘Butazu’ banana variety irrigation potential improved technology pre-scale up
License

Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Horticultural Science

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Wubet, A., Assefa, N., Mihretu, A., & Ayen, K. (2022). Pre-scaling up evaluation of banana technology under irrigation conditions in Abergelle District, Wag-himra Zone, Ethiopia. International Journal of Horticultural Science, 28, 39-44. https://doi.org/10.31421/ijhs/28/2022/10787
Abstract

The study was conducted to compare the improved banana technology against the local production technique to enhance demand-driven banana technology up-scaling and diffusion. Data were collected at the field and farmers' levels. Descriptive and inferential statistics, cost-benefit analysis and matrix ranking were employed for analysis. The result revealed that the average yield (38.40 ton ha-1) of improved banana technology had a significant yield advantage (47.24%) over the local practice (p<0.05). Despite the higher cost of production, its net return was by far higher than the local practice. The benefit-cost ratio also displays that 9.49 Ethiopian Birr (ETB) profit per 1.00 ETB investment in an improved technology package. The overall farmers' perceptions were laid under strongly agree and agree categories, and 95% of them believed that the improved banana technology was appropriate for their area and hence accepted with full confidence. The respective organizations working on rural livelihood improvement are therefore advised to up-scale the improved technology for the wider community based on the irrigation potential.

References
  1. L. Abebaw,T. Alemu,L. Kassa,T. Dessie,and G. Leges (2013): Analysis of Goat Value Chains in Sekota Abergelle District , Northern Ethiopia. Addis Ababa.
  2. Ademe Mihiretu, Asmiro Abeje, Lijalem Abebaw, Tsega Desalegn (2018): Participatory Evaluation of Hybrid Sorghum Technologies: In Mid and Low Land Areas of Waghimra Zone, Eastern Amhara, Ethiopia. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Regional Conference on Completed Research Activities of Socio-Economics and Agricultural Extension Research, 9-20 March 2015: 112–27. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6935e.pdf.
  3. Al-Sayaad, Rabea, Samrah (2006): Statistics for Economics and Administration Studies. Dar Hafez, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  4. Arnarson, Atli (2019): Bananas Nutrition Facts and Health Benefits. Authority Nutrition: 1–12. https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/foods/bananas (February 3, 2022).
  5. Chandrashekhar Vasant Kothawade (2019): Medicinal and Nutritional Importance of Banana. Acta Scientific Agriculture 3(5): 29–33.
  6. CIMMYT (1988): From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: Mexico.
  7. CSA (2017): Report on Area and Production of Major Crops. Addis Ababa. https://www.statsethiopia.gov.et/our-survey-reports/
  8. CSA (2020): Report on Area and Production of Major Crops. Addis Ababa. https://www.statsethiopia.gov.et/our-survey-reports/
  9. Douglas G. Bonett1 and Thomas A. Wright ( 2014): Cronbach ’ s Alpha Reliability: Interval Estimation , Hypothesis Testing , and Sample Size Planning. Journal of Organizational Behavior (October). DOI: 10.1002/job.1960
  10. FAO (2020): Banana Market Review Snapshot. http://www.fao.org/3/ca9212en/ca9212en.pdf.
  11. Gebre-Mariam, S. (2003): Status of Commercial Fruit Production in Ethiopia. EIAR. Acta Horticulturae 879 (d): 129–40. http://www.eiar.org.et/
  12. German Calberto, G., C. Staver and P. Siles (2015): An Assessment of Global Banana Production and Suitability under Climate Change Scenarios, In: Climate Change and Food Systems: Global Assessments and Implications for Food Security and Trade. Roma.
  13. Koeppel, D. (2008): The Fate of the Fruit That Changed the World. First Edition. New York.
  14. Menkir, M. and Bekele, S (2007): Irrigation Practices in Ethiopia: Characteristics of Selected Irrigation Schemes. Working. Colombo.
  15. Ademe Mihretu, Netsanet Asefa and Adane Wubet (2019): Participatory Evaluation of Sorghum Technolo- Gies in the Marginal Dryland Zones of Wag-Lasta , Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture 5(October): 0–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2019.1671114
  16. Ostertag Gálvez, Carlos Felipe, Mark Lundy, María Verónica Gottret, Rupert Best, Dai Peters and Shaun Ferris (2005): A Guide to Identifying Market Opportunities for Rural Smallholder Producers Manual 2 : The Territorial Approach to Rural Agro-Enterprise Development. Cali, Collombia.
  17. Ruth Ravid (2011): Practical Statistics for Educators. Fivth edit United States of America: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. http://www.rowmanlittlefield.com.
  18. Taherdoost, Hamed (2017): Sampling Methods in Research Methodology ; How to Choose a Sampling Sampling Methods in Research Methodology ; How to Choose a Sampling Technique For. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM) DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3205035
  19. Woldu, Zenebe, Ali Mohammed, Derbew Belew, and Zekarias Shumeta (2015): Assessment of Banana Production and Marketing In Ethiopia. International Journal of Science s: Basic and Applied Research 4531: 283–307. http://gssrr.org/index.php?journal=JournalOfBasicAndApplied
  20. Zinabu Ambisa (2019): Review on the Production and Marketing of Banana in Ethiopia. World Journal of Agriculture and Soil Science 2(1): 1–9. DOI: 10.33552/WJASS.2019.02.000529