Economics

Comparative Analysis of Collaborative Robots

Published:
2023-04-10
Author
View
Keywords
License

Copyright (c) 2023 Zsolt Buri

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Buri, Z. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Collaborative Robots. International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences, 7(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.21791/IJEMS.2022.4.1.
Received 2022-11-09
Accepted 2023-02-06
Published 2023-04-10
Abstract

In our study, we provided a comparison of four robot arms used in industry to determine  the most suitable model to adopt in university education. We investigated robot arms from the following manufacturers: ABB, Kuka, Universal Robots, and Techman Robot. The multi-criteria system was grounded on the important factor and experience. Following this, each aspect was ranked using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. In addition, the order among the four alternatives was established by using the Kesselring method. The present study describes a selection method for industrial robots in the academic area.

References
  1. El Zaatari, S. - Marei, M. - Li, W. - Usman, Z. (2019) ’Cobot programming for collaborative industrial tasks: An overview’, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 116, pp. 162–180, doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2019.03.003.
  2. Bicchi, A. - Peshkin M. A. - Colgate J. E. (2008) ’Safety for Physical Human–Robot Interaction’, Springer Handbook of Robotics, pp. 1335–1348, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5_58.
  3. Kolbeinsson, A. – Lagerstedt E., Lindblom J. (2019) ’Foundation for a classification of collaboration levels for human-robot cooperation in manufacturing’, Production & Manufacturing Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 448–471, doi: 10.1080/21693277.2019.1645628.
  4. Weiss, A. - Wortmeier, A. K. - Kubicek B. (2021) ’Cobots in Industry 4.0: A Roadmap for Future Practice Studies on Human–Robot Collaboration,’ IEEE Trans. Human-Mach. Syst., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 335–345, doi: 10.1109/thms.2021.3092684.
  5. Sherwani, F. - Asad, M. M. - Ibrahim, B. (2020) ’Collaborative Robots and Industrial Revolution 4.0 (IR 4.0)’, 2020 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Smart Technologies (ICETST), Karachi, Pakistan, pp. 1–5., doi: 10.1109/ICETST49965.2020.9080724.
  6. Ostergaard, E. H. (2017) ’The role of cobots in Industry 4.0’, Universal Robots
  7. Nasanjargal, E. – Kocsi, B. – Máté, D. (2022) ’ A Risk-Based Analysis Approach to Sustainable Construction by Environmental Impacts’ Eneregies, 15, 6736. , doi: 10.3390/en15186736
  8. Saaty, T. L. (1980), The analytic hierarchy process. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill (in English).
  9. Dong, Q. - Saaty, T.L. (2014) ’An analytic hierarchy process model of group consensus’ Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 362–374, doi: 10.1007/s11518-014-5247-8
  10. Rapcsák T. (2007) ’Többszempontú döntési problémák’, Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem, p. 111.
  11. Harrington, J. E. (2009), ’Games, strategies and decision making’, Worth Publishing. ISBN 9781429239967
  12. Adams, J. - Juleff, L. (2003) ’Managerial economics for decision making’, Palgrave. ISBN 9780333961117
  13. INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF ROBOTICS (2022): “World Robotics Industrial Robots 2022,” report.
  14. Universal Robots, Universal Robot UR5e, Forrás: https://www.universal-robots.com/hu/e-series/ (letöltve: 2022.10.13.)
  15. KUKA Robots, KUKA LBR IIWA 7, Forrás: https://robots.ieee.org/robots/lbriiwa/ (letöltve: 2022.10.13)
  16. ABB GoFa, ABB GoFa CRB 15000, Forrás: https://qviro.com/product/abb/gofa-crb-15000 (letöltve: 2022. 10. 13.)
  17. Techman Robot, Techman Robot TM5-900 https://wiredworkers.io/nl/product/tm5-900/ (letöltve: 2022.10.13.)
Database Logos