Search

Search Results

• Assessing Language Learners’ Knowledge and Performance during Covid-19

  38-46

  Ilona Huszti

  Márta Fábián

  Ilona Lechner

  Erzsébet Bárány

  Views:

  528

  The new reality created by the COVID-19 caused a lot of changes in the educational sphere. The transition from face-to-face to distance learning was not smooth in Ukraine because distance learning was not a common practice in the country before and teachers were unprepared for teaching online. This unusual situation prompted us to start our qualitative research primarily to get insights into the altered daily routines of teachers and educators. In particular, we were interested in how they assessed their students’ performance online. This article focuses on secondary school language teachers (n=65) and language tutors at the tertiary level (n=18). The research findings have revealed that teachers gave feedback through different digital applications like Google Classroom. Oral performance was evaluated either synchronously or asynchronously. The most crucial implication is that teachers should improve and further develop their digital skills and distance teaching and assessing skills in order to provide quality education in the modern form.

• Pedagogical modernization or political assimilation? The 1879 elementary education act in the mirror of parliamentary debates and Néptanítók Lapja

  13-19

  Katalin Kéri

  Views:

  94

  Act XVIII of 1879, which mandated the teaching of the Hungarian language in all elementary schools across Hungary, represented a decisive turning point in the educational structure of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy. Drawing upon the theoretical frameworks of Ernest Gellner (1983) and Eugen Weber (1976), this research focuses on how state-driven linguistic homogenization emerged simultaneously as a professional necessity and a tool of nation-building. Our study presents the content of the act and the pro et contra arguments within the parliamentary debates surrounding its adoption. Furthermore, it highlights the core concepts and elements of the official pedagogical discourse following the legislation through a qualitative thematic analysis of the 1879 issues of Néptanítók Lapja (People’s Teachers’ Gazette), a government-sponsored weekly professional journal. Our findings reveal an inherent contradiction in the official rhetoric: while the journal promoted innovative, communication-centered “natural methods” in language instruction, these pedagogical advancements primarily served to consolidate political loyalty and erode minority national identities. The analysis identifies three main discourse types: the professionalization of the “Magyarization” process, the ideological construction of the Hungarian language as a “civilizational” prerequisite for social mobility, and the practical challenges faced by rural educators working in multilingual environments. By placing the Hungarian case within a broader European comparative perspective, the study contributes to the understanding of how 19th-century school systems functioned as arenas for national identity construction in multiethnic regions.