dEjournals Home Page
International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences
Register Current issue Forthcoming Archives Indexing Submission Contact Search
Register Login
IJEMS

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023)
Sport Economics

Wearable technology usage among students of the University of Debrecen

Published:
April 30, 2023
DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.21791/IJEMS.2023.1.5.
Authors
Gergely Ráthonyi,
Kinga Ráthonyi-Odor,
György Szabados,
Zoltán Bács,
Éva Bácsné Bába
View
hu
Keywords
wearable technology smartwatch activity tracker physical activity
License

Copyright (c) 2023 Gergely Ráthonyi, Kinga Ráthonyi-Odor, György Szabados, Zoltán Bács, Éva Bácsné Bába

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Ráthonyi, G., Ráthonyi-Odor, K., Szabados, G., Bács, Z., & Bácsné Bába, Éva. (2023). Wearable technology usage among students of the University of Debrecen. International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences, 8(1), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.21791/IJEMS.2023.1.5.
Abstract

The lack of physical activity and the growing prevalence of a sedentary lifestyle are urgent public health problem worldwide. The problem is also typical of the young population, especially university students, who spend most of the day in a sitting position. Technological development is one of the catalysts for the rise of a sedentary lifestyle, nevertheless, thanks to this, many devices have appeared on the market that can be used to encourage physical activity. The widespread of wearable activity tracker devices – wristwatches, wristbands – among the population shows a constantly increasing trend, with a parallel increase in the amount of data collected about ourselves (step count, calories burned, heart rate). The main goal of the present study derives from the recognition of the gap in this field in the domestic sports science literature therefore our focus is on modern information technology tools in the dimension of physical activity. The aim of this study is to assess the attitudes of the university student population towards activity-tracking devices. We conducted a cross-sectional online quantitative survey (questionnaire) among DE GTK students. 340 people filled out the questionnaire correctly. In addition to descriptive statistics, parametric and non-parametric tests (Pearson's chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, t-test, Mann-Whitney test) were used to examine the relationships. The results of the statistical tests were considered significant if p<0.05. We performed the distribution of the variables using the Kolgomorov-Smirnov test. The majority of respondents (55%) have already tried some kind of wearable device that measures physical activity. Every third student (34%) are currently using their device. Those who have not tried these devices so far indicated the price as the primary deterrent. 32% of the students plan to invest in such a device in the future. 39% of device users use an activity tracker bracelet, while 61% use or used a smartwatch. In terms of sex, we did not find any differences in asset ownership. The primary goal of the students (66.8%) was to track their physical activity. The most frequently used function was tracking the number of steps, indicated by 81% of the respondents, followed by heart rate measurement (67%). Most of them (69%) set some kind of goal regarding their number of steps. According to every third student, they moved more as a result of the device and managed to maintain the increased level of physical activity. 44% of the students claimed that their physical activity did not change despite using the device. Students tend to disagree with the positive statements related to the devices in connection with a healthy lifestyle. Although the present study suggests that wearable devices have an impact on students and they track their measured data, it is questionable whether the devices themselves are enough of an incentive for students to develop a healthier lifestyle.

References
  1. Hallal, P.C., Andersen, L.B., Bull, F.C., Guthold, R., Haskell, W., Ekelund, U. (2012): Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet, 380(9838):247–257.
  2. Rosenkranz, S.K., Mailey, E.L., Umansky, E., Rosenkranz, R.R. and Ablah, E. (2020), “Workplace sedentary behavior and productivity: A cross-sectional study”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 17 No. 18, available at:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186535.
  3. Martos, É., Bakacs, M., Sarkadi-Nagy, E., Ráczkevy. T., Zentai, A., Baldauf, Z., Illés, E., Lugasi, A. (2012): The national nutrition and nutritional status of tests OTÁP 2009 IV. − entering the Hungarian population. Medical Weekly, 153:29. 1132-1141.
  4. Ács, P., Prémusz, V., Melczer, Cs., Bergier, J., Ferdinand, S., Jan, J., Makai, A. (2018): Nemek közötti különbségek vizsgálata a fizikai aktivitás vonatkozásában a V4 országok egyetemista populációjának körében. Magyar Sporttudományi Szemle, 19:74. 3-9.
  5. Bauman, A.E. (2004): Updating the evidence that physical activity is good for health: an epidemiological review 2000–2003. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 7(1):6–19.
  6. Warburton, D.E.R., Nicol, C.W. and Bredin, S.S.D. (2006), “Health benefits of physical activity: The evidence”, CMAJ, available at:https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.051351.
  7. Haskell, W.L., Lee, I.M., Pate, R.R., Blair, S.N., Franklin, B.A., Macera, C.A., Heath, G.W., Thompson, P.D., Bauman, A. (2007): Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 39:8. 1423–34.
  8. Lee, I.M., Shiroma, E.J., Lobelo, F., Puska, P., Blair, S.N., Katzmarzyk, P.T. (2012): Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet, 380(9838) 219–229.
  9. Chau, J.Y., Grunseit, A.C., Chey, T., Stamatakis, E., Brown, W.J., Matthews, C.E., Bauman, A.E., et al. (2013), “Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: A meta-analysis”, PLoS ONE, Vol. 8 No. 11, available at:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080000.
  10. Biswas, A., Oh, P.I., Faulkner, G.E., Bajaj, R.R., Silver, M.A., Mitchell, M.S. and Alter, D.A. (2015), “Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults a systematic review and meta-analysis”, Annals of Internal Medicine, available at:https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-1651.
  11. De Rezende, L.F.M., Lopes, M.R., Rey-Loṕez, J.P., Matsudo, V.K.R. and Luiz, O.D.C. (2014), “Sedentary behavior and health outcomes: An overview of systematic reviews”, PLoS ONE, Vol. 9 No. 8, available at:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105620.
  12. Apor, P. (2012): Testedzéssel a megbetegedések ellen. Magyar Tudomány, 173:12. 1470-1477.
  13. Kooiman, T.J.M., Dontje, M.L., Sprenger, S.R., Krijen, W.P., van der Schans, C.P., de Groot, M. (2015): Reliability and validity of ten consumer activity trackers. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 7:24. 1-11.
  14. Lynch, C., Bird, S., Lythgo, N., & Selva-Raj, I. (2020): Changing the physical activity behavior of adults with fitness trackers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Health Promotion, 34(4), 418–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117119895204.
  15. Brickwood, K. J., Watson, G., O’Brien, J., & Williams, A. D. (2019): Consumer-based wearable activity trackers increase physical activity participation: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(4), e11819. https://doi.org/10.2196/11819.
  16. Utesch, T., Piesch, L., Busch, L., Strauss, B., Geukes, K. (2022): Self-tracking of daily physical activity using a fitness tracker and the effect of the 10,000 steps goal. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 52, 300–309 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-022-00821-2
  17. Bort-Roig, J., Gilson, N.D., Puig-Ribera, A., Contreras, R.S., Trost, S.G. (2014): Measuring and influencing physical activity with smartphone technology: a systematic review. Sports Medicine, 44(5):671–686.
  18. El-Amrawy, F., Nounou, M.I. (2015): Are currently available wearable devices for activity tracking and heart rate monitoring accurate, precise, and medically beneficial? Healthcare Informatics Research, 21:4. 315-320.
  19. Evenson, K.R., Goto, M.M., Furberg, R.D. (2015): Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12:1. 1-22.
  20. Fuller, D., Colwell, E., Low, J., Orychock, K., Tobin, M.A., Simango, B., Buote, R., Van Heerden, D., Luan, H., Cullen, K., Slade, L., Taylor, N.G.A. (2020): Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8(9):e18694
  21. Gualtieri, L., Rosenbluth, S., Phillips, J. (2016): Can a free wearable activity tracker change behavior? The impact of trackers on adults in a physician-led wellness group. JMIR Research Protocol, 5:4.
  22. Mercer, K., Lim M., Giangregorio, L., Burns, C., Grindrod, K. (2016): Behavior change techniques present in wearable activity trackers: a critical analysis. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth, 4:2.
  23. World Health Organization (2020): Global recommendations on physical activity for health. World Health Organization. URL: https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_recommendations /en/ [Letöltés ideje: 2022.10.17.]
  24. Godino, J.G., Watkinson, C., Corder, K., Sutton, S., Griffin, S.J., Van Sluijs, E.M. (2014): Awareness of physical activity in healthy middle-aged adults: a crosssectional study of associations with sociodemographic, biological, behavioural, and psychological factors. BMC Public Health, 14:421. 1-9.
  25. Vooijs, M., Alpay, L.L., Snoeck-Stroband, J.B., Beerthuizen, T., Siemonsma, P.C., Abbink, J.J., Sont, J.K., Rövekamp, T.A. (2014): Validity and usability of low-cost accelerometers for internet-based self-monitoring of physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Interactive Journal of Medical Research, 3:4. e14.
  26. Vallanceff, J., Eurich, D., Gardiner, P., Taylor, L., Johnson, S. (2016): Associations of daily pedometer steps and self-reported physical activity with health-related quality of life: results from the Alberta Older Adult Health Survey. Journal of Aging and Health, 28:4. 661-674.
  27. Bravata, D.M., Smith-Spangler, C., Sundaram, V., Gienger, A.L., Lin, N., Lewis, R., Stave, C.D., Olkin, I., Sirard, J.R. (2007): Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA, 298:19. 2296–2304.
  28. El-Gayar, O., Timsina, P., Nawar, N., Eid, W. (2013): A systematic review of IT for diabetes self-management: are we there yet? International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82:8. 637–652.
  29. Middelweerd, A., Mollee, J.S., van der Wal, C., Brug, J., Te Velde, S.J. (2014): Apps to promote physical activity among adults: a review and content analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11(1):97.
  30. Statista (2022): Do you personally use wearables (e.g. smart watch, health / fitness tracker)? Elérhetőség: https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1101110/wearables-devices-usage-in-selected-countries, (Letöltés dátuma: 2022.12.01.)
  31. eNET Internetkutató Kft. (2019): Egészségtudatosabbak az okosórák és okoskarkötők hazai használói, Elérhetőség: https://enet.hu/egeszsegtudatosabbak-az-okosorak-es-okoskarkotok-hazai-hasznaloi/. (Letöltés dátuma: 2022.10.03.)
  32. Balogh, Cs., Dragon, Z., Pusztai, B. (2021): Viselhető eszközök a szegedi egyetemisták körében, ME.DOK: Média-Történet-Kommunikáció 16 : 3 pp. 69-84. , 16 p.
  33. Kinney, D.A., Nabors, L.A., Merianos, A.L., Vidourek, R.A. (2019): College Students’ Use and Perceptions of Wearable Fitness Trackers, American Journal of Health Education, 50:5, 298-307, DOI: 10.1080/19325037.2019.1642265
  34. Tong, H.L., Maher, C., Parker, K., Pham, T.D., Neves, A.L., Riordan, B., Chow, C.K., Laranjo, L., Quiroz, J.C. (2022): The use of mobile apps and fitness trackers to promote healthy behaviors during COVID-19: A cross-sectional survey. PLOS Digital Health 1(8): e0000087. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000087
  35. Huawei (2022): Kutatás: a mentális állapotunk nagy hatással van a szívünk egészségére Elérhetőség: https://huawei.hu/2022/11/10/kutatas-a-mentalis-allapotunk-nagy-hatassal-van-a-szivunk-egeszsegere/, (Letöltés dátuma: 2022.12.01.)
  36. Moye, R., Towns, T., Skipper, A., Rose, D. (2022): Are Smartwatches Actually Used for Exercise? Evidence from HBCU Students, American Journal of Health Education, 53:4, 219-227, DOI: 10.1080/19325037.2022.2071780
  37. Maher, C., Ryan, J., Ambrosi, C., Edney, S. (2017): Users’ experiences of wearable activity trackers: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 17, 880. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4888-1
Database Logos
DOAJ MTMT SHERPA EIRHPLUS EBSCO CROSSREF