dEjournals Home Page
Central European Journal of Educational Research
Current Archives Guides Templates Submit online Search
Register Login

Central European Journal of Educational Research

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Minority Education Success
Research papers

A dimension of well-being among talented students – An empirical study at the University of Debrecen

Published:
2025-12-31
DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.37441/cejer/2025/7/2/16306
Authors
Zsuzsanna Mándy,
Roland Filep,
Krisztina Dajnoki
View
PDF
Keywords
talent management higher education psychological well‑being personal growth longitudinal studies
License

Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Mándy, Z., Filep, R., & Dajnoki, K. (2025). A dimension of well-being among talented students – An empirical study at the University of Debrecen. Central European Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.37441/cejer/2025/7/2/16306
Abstract

Talent management in higher education remains a key issue, as university students are inherently talented when pursuing academic studies. Beyond this, many students engage in extracurricular activities, reflecting deeper personal motivations. This examines participants' future career orientation in a university Talent Management Program by examining their life goals. While many students lack clear aims during their studies, we hypothesize that talented students show stronger self-acceptance, autonomy, and a commitment to continuous development and growth. The Ryff-18 questionnaire assessed students’ psychological well-being across six dimensions: self-acceptance, quality of relationships, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life, and personal growth. The research is part of a longitudinal study, launched in the 2016/2017 academic year and repeated in 2023/2024, allowing for generational comparison between Generation Z and Millennials. All Talent Program students were invited to participate. In 2016/2017, 359 of 489 students responded (73.41%), and in 2023/2024, 201 of 671 (16.69%). Students rated “living day by day” highly in both years, and acquiring new experiences was low. Despite this, results indicate that participants are generally goal-oriented and prioritize long-term aims over novelty-seeking. These findings highlight consistent traits among talented students across generations.

References
  1. Aristovnik, A., Keržič, D., Ravšelj, D., Tomaževič, N., & Umek, L. (2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global perspective. Sustainability, 12(20), 8438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208438
  2. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
  3. Arnett, J. J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  4. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students’ intellectual development. Jossey-Bass.
  5. Bán, E., Ilyésné Molnár, E., Jármai, E. M., & Vágány, J. (2023). Talent management in hungarian economic higher education– the scientific students' associations and the economicscience section in focus. Vezetéstudomány, 54(7–8), 105–120.
  6. Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
  7. Bodnár, G., & Mező, F. (Eds.). (2024). Talent development in higher education. Debrecen University Press.
  8. Callais, V. (2020). Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. Journal of College Orientation, Transition, and Retention, 27. https://doi.org/10.24926/jcotr.v27i2.3099.
  9. Ceglédi, T., Fényes, H., & Pusztai, G. (2022). The Effect of Resilience and Gender on the Persistence of Higher Education Students. Social Sciences, 11(3), 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11030093
  10. Clayton, S., & Brown, L. A. (2024). Climate Change and Mental Health. JAMA, 331(20), 1761–1762. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.1839.
  11. Costa, P. T., Jr., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322
  12. Czeglédi, T. (2018). Ugródeszkán: Reziliencia és társadalmi egyenlőtlenségek a felsőoktatásban [On the Springboard: Resilience and Social Inequalities in Higher Education]. Debreceni Egyetem Felsőoktatási Kutató és Fejlesztő Központ (CHERD).
  13. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Wiley.
  14. European Commission. (2012). Rethinking education: Investing in skills for better socio-economic outcomes. Publications Office of the European Union.
  15. Fan, W., & Yan, Z. (2010). Factors affecting response rates of the web survey. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015
  16. Gebregergis, W., & Csukonyi, Cs. (2025). Psychosocial determinants of student well-being: The role of academic burnout, social support and learning empowerment through psychological capital. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 15. https://doi.org/10.1556/063.2025.00357.
  17. Gerhardt, T., & Karsan, S. (2022). Talent management in private universities: the case of a private university in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(4), 552–575. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2020-0222
  18. Görbe, É. (2012). Tehetséggondozás a felsőoktatásban [Talent Development in Higher Education]. XXI. Század – Tudományos Közlemények, 2012/27, 111–124.
  19. Greenfield, P. (2009). Technology and Informal Education: What Is Taught, What Is Learned. Science (New York, N.Y.). 323. 69-71. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167190.
  20. Győri, K., & Pusztai G. (2022). Exploring the Relational Embeddedness of Higher Educational Students During Hungarian Emergency Remote Teaching. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.814168.
  21. Illeris, K. (2014). Transformative learning and identity. Routledge.
  22. Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Harvard University Press.
  23. Kroger, J. (2007). Identity development: Adolescence through adulthood (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
  24. Kun, A. I., Boros, J., & Kotsis, Ágnes. (2022). Tudják-e a hallgatók, hogy mennyit (nem) tudnak? – A Dunning–Kruger-hatás vizsgálata üzleti szakokon tanuló felsőoktatási szakképzéses hallgatók körében [Do students know how much (or how little) they know? – An examination of the Dunning–Kruger effect among vocational higher education students in business programs]. Marketing & Menedzsment, 56(3), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2022.56.03.01
  25. Lewicka, D. (2022). Building and rebuilding trust in higher education institutions (HEIs): Student’s perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(6), 887–915. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM‑02‑2022‑0037
  26. McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5(2), 100–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.2.100
  27. McLean, K. C., & Pratt, M. W. (2006). Life’s little (and big) lessons: Identity statuses and meaning-making in the turning point narratives of emerging adults. Developmental Psychology, 42(4), 714–722. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.4.714
  28. Musakuro, R. N. (2022). Talent management practices in a selected South African higher education institution. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20, 532–542. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(1).2022.42.
  29. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation. Jossey-Bass.
  30. Neihart, M. (1999). The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being. Roeper Review, 22(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553991.
  31. Nijs, S. & Meyers, C. & Woerkom, M. (2024). Talent Development in the Context of Higher Education. In M. Thunnissen & P. (Eds.), Talent Management in Higher Education. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80262-685-820241007.
  32. OECD. (2012). Better skills, better jobs, better lives. OECD Publishing.
  33. OECD. (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
  34. Pew Research Center. (2019). Millennials and political engagement. Pew Research Center.
  35. Poláková, P., & Klímová, B. (2019). Mobile Technology and Generation Z in the English Language Classroom—A Preliminary Study. Education Sciences, 9(3), 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030203
  36. Porter, S. R., & Whitcomb, M. E. (2005). Non-response in student surveys. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1597-2
  37. Purcell, W. M., & Lumbreras, J. Higher education and the COVID-19 pandemic: navigating disruption using the sustainable development goals. Discov Sustain, 2, 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-021-00013-2
  38. Racine, N., McArthur, B. A., Cooke, J. E., Eirich, R., Zhu, J., & Madigan, S. (2021). Global Prevalence of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms in Children and Adolescents During COVID-19: A Meta-analysis. JAMA pediatrics, 175(11), 1142–1150. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.2482
  39. Rahmani, S., & Lavasani, M. (2012). Gender Differences in Five Factor Model of Personality and Sensation Seeking. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2906–2911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.587.
  40. Ramaditya, M., Maarif, M., Affandi, M., &. Sukmawati A. (2022). A Systematic Literature Review of Talent Management And Knowledge Management In Improving Higher Education Performance. International Journal of Indonesian Business Review, 1, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.54099/ijibr.v1i1.199.
  41. Reuter, M. et al. (2021). A longitudinal study of the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on students' health behavior, mental health and emotional well-being. PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12528
  42. Roy, M., Das, S., Majumder, T., & Ray, N. (2025). Evolving workplace priorities: a study on gen z's core values. International Journal of Advances in Business and Management Research, 03, 01–11. https://doi.org/10.62674/ijabmr.2025.v3i01.001.
  43. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
  44. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
  45. Ryff, C. D. (2013). Psychological well-being revisited. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263
  46. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727.
  47. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0
  48. Salmela-Aro, K., & Read, S. (2017). Study Engagement and Burnout profiles among Finnish Higher Education Students. Burnout Research, 7, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2017.11.001.
  49. Sax, L. J. (2008). The gender gap in college: Maximizing the developmental potential of women and men. Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
  50. Schaufeli, W. B. et al. (2002). The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
  51. Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2019). Generation Z goes to college. Jossey-Bass.
  52. Seifert, T. A. (2005). The Ryff Scales of Psychological Well-Being. Assessment Notes, 15(4), 17–19.
  53. Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056.
  54. Surugiu, C., Surugiu, M.-R., Grădinaru, C., & Grigore, A.-M. (2025). Factors motivating Generation Z in the workplace: Managerial challenges and insights. Administrative Sciences, 15(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15010029
  55. Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2025). Enhancing Survey Participation in Academic Research: Strategies, Challenges, and a Framework for Optimal Response Rates. European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, 24, 114–121. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecrm.24.1.3724.
  56. Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. Higher Education Academy.
  57. Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy — and completely unprepared for adulthood. Atria Books.
  58. Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2010). The narcissism epidemic. Atria Books.
  59. VanTassel-Baska, J. (2005). Gifted Programs and Services: What Are the Nonnegotiables? Theory Into Practice, 44(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4402_3
  60. Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Barbaranelli, C., & Caprara, G. V. (2012). Gender differences in the Big Five personality development: A longitudinal investigation from late adolescence to emerging adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(6), 740–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.033
  61. World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020
  62. Wirthwein, L., & Rost, D. H. (2011). Giftedness and subjective well-being: A study with adults. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.001
  63. Zsatku, B., & Kováts, G. (2022). The impact of institutional governance reforms on organisational culture – two case studies from Finland and Hungary. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 64–85. https://doi.org/10.1556/063.2022.00165