Search

Search Results

• Market Challenges in the Marketing of Meat Products, Especially in Terms of Consumer Behavior

  43-55

  Tamás Marczin

  Bogrlárka Brumár

  Mihály Soós

  Views:

  127

  In recent years, the food industry has been facing new challenges related to consumer demands. New trends are replacing the old familiar ones, affecting the consumption of meat products and the acceptance of processed products. In the Hungarian context, it is also noteworthy that consumer behaviour is particularly price-sensitive. In this new market environment, meat industry operators, including companies developing stuffed meat products, need to engage in marketing activities that will enable them to sell their products successfully. The aim of this research is to highlight the factors that determine this process from the point of view of consumer preferences and the players in the sector. The results of the research show that the majority of consumers consume meat products on a weekly or daily basis. In terms of diet, there is an even split between fresh and processed products and mixed consumption. In terms of meat preferences, the vast majority of consumers prefer to consume the well-known and traditional meat products: chicken, beef, pork and fish. Few people include meat products that are specialities of the national cuisine (rabbit, duck, goose, game) in their diet. A similar trend can be observed for attitudes towards stuffed meat products, where the taste and product are typically dominant in purchasing decisions. This suggests that domestic consumers continue to consider meat products as an important factor in their diet. However, it is precisely because of this fact that operators in the product field need to adopt a marketing strategy that takes account of consumers' price sensitivity, their conservative attitude and the fact that they identify the product group as a staple food. Thus, in the case of product development by introducing a new flavour or changing a key product characteristic, it is important to introduce and promote it in a considered way, as this will make consumers more willing to incorporate it into their purchasing decisions.
  
  JEL codes: M31, Q13, Q18

• What sort of Carrier Food Should Be Enhanced by Functional Food Producers? – A Continuation of a Scientific Debate in Hungary

  35-48

  Viola Vonyó

  Ágoston Temesi

  Views:

  300

  The basis of our study was provided by the question previously discussed in literature: whether functional food producers should enrich unhealthy or healthy carriers. Most of the previous studies reached the conclusion that such foods can be the carriers of successful functional foods that are perceived as healthy by themselves, such as yoghurt, cereals, orange juice and whole grain products. According to some authors, however, carriers that are perceived as healthy are not worth improving functionally, because they are perceived as healthy by themselves, so consumers did not find artificial enrichment necessary. The main objective of the study was to find out that the enrichment of which foods would be the most justified for food companies in Hungary. In our online questionnaire reaching 2034 respondents we built on the methodology of previous studies. As part of the questionnaire, based on conjoint cards, we created different mini-concepts to study the respondents’ willingness to buy them. For Hungarian customers, based on the respondents’ answers, the enrichment of “healthy foods”– aligning with the findings of several other researchers – generally makes the judgment of the product even more favourable, however, we also agree with the findings of researchers arguing differently, namely that in the case of an unhealthy product enrichment can cause a bigger change in how healthy it is perceived. But in the case when a functional food developer wants to sell their product with its healthy image, it is a better choice to enrich a carrier that is perceived as healthy, because the purchase intention for the product created by enriching something “unhealthy” is not going to be as high as the purchase intention for the non-enriched product seen as healthy.

  JEL code: I15