Materials Sciences

Effect of the Flow Curve Determination on the Thinning of Drawn Parts

Published:
December 30, 2023
Authors
View
Keywords
License

Copyright (c) 2023 Martin László Kölüs, Richárd Borbély, Dániel Gyula Szőke, Gábor József Dr. Béres

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Kölüs, M. L., Borbély, R., Szőke, D. G., & Béres, G. J. (2023). Effect of the Flow Curve Determination on the Thinning of Drawn Parts. International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences, 8(4), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.21791/IJEMS.2023.032
Abstract

This study presents the results of finite element simulations based on different variations of the flow curve of DC04 automotive thin sheet. The aim of our research is to investigate how different flow curve equations affect the variation of sheet thickness in cup drawing tests. In order to exclude other influencing factors in the experiment, both the sheet material and the geometric properties of the specimen, as well as the external state factors were considered to be the same in all cases. The finite element simulations were performed using Simufact 2021.1 software. Our results shows that there are no significant differences in wall thicknesses until we reach the zone of double necking, where essential differences are observed.

References
  1. D. Banabic, H.-J. Bunge, K. Pöhlandt, A.E. Tekkaya, “Formabiliti of Metallic Materials”, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Barcelona, Hong Kong, London, Milan, Paris, Singapore, Tokyo, 2000.
  2. Kurt Lange, Klaus Pöhlandt, Ragu S. Raghupathi, John D. Sainter, Wolfgang J. Sauer, John A. Schey, Klaus J. Wienmann, G.E.O. Widera, “Handbook of Metalforming”, Soceity of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, Michigen 48121, U.S.A, 1985.
  3. Kraus, M., Lenzen, M., Merklein, M., “Contact pressure-dependent friction characterization by using a single sheet metal compression test”, Wear, 476, 203679, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2021.203679.
  4. Coppieters, S., Traphöner, H., Stiebert, F., Balan, T., Kuwabara, T., Tekkaya, A.E., “Large strain flow curve identification for sheet metal”, Journal of Materials Processing Tech., 308, 117725, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117725.
  5. Coppieters, S., Jackel, M., Kraus, C., Kuwabara, T., Barlat, F., “Influence of a Hydrostatic Pressure Shift on the Flow Stress in Sheet Metal”, Procedia Manufacturing, 47, 1245-1249, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.196.
  6. Hockett, J.E., Sherby, O.D., J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 23, 87-98, 1975.
  7. Jekel, C.F., Venter, G., Venter, M.P. et al., Int J Mater Form, 12: 355, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-018-1421-8.
  8. Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe AG: Product Information, Deep-drawing steels DD, DC and DX. 2018 version 0
  9. P. Christiansen, P.A.F. Martins, N.Bay, “Friction Compensation in the Upsetting of Cylindrical Test Specimens”, Experimental Mechanics, 56:1271–1279, 2016.
  10. Xin-cun Zhuang et al., Determination of Flow Curve and Plastic Anisotropy of Medium-thick Metal Plate: Experiments and Inverse Analysis, Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International, 2015.
  11. Paul, S.K., “Theoretical analysis of strain- and stress-based forming limit diagrams” J Strain Analysis 48(3), 177-188, 2013.
  12. Hill, R., “A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. The hydrodynamics of non-Newtonian fluids. I”, 281-297, 1947.
Database Logos