Corruption as a concomitant phenomenon of the lack of democratic traditions or thoughts on the margin of failure of the democratic experiment in 1945
https://doi.org/10.30716/RSZ/20/2/2
Author
View
Keywords
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How To Cite
Abstract
For decades, there has been an open debate among historians about whether there was democracy in our country in 1945, and if so, what those few transition years were like, and what caused the failure of democracy. The study, – instead of the democratic state of the electoral system, the rule of law, respect for freedoms, self-government and civil society organization, – attempts to highlight the presence or absence of democratic traditions, which is generally less attended to, but undoubtedly was also part of the failure of the democratic experiment in 1945. Perhaps surprising, but the political and moral traditions of a society determine the chances for the development and survival of a democracy. In a corrupt, morally inferior society, it is more difficult to establish and operate democracy. Thus, democracy is guaranteed not only by the appearance of institutions and elections, but also by the thinking of the people living in it and by the norms that determine their behavior. The study illustrates the peculiarity of Hungary with examples mostly from Szolnok that in the 20th century the interchanging systems were struggling with a serious deficit of democracy, and therefore no democratic traditions could be formed in the society, and in 1945 they could not go back to such antecedents. Therefore, after 1945, Hungarian society appears as corrupt as it did before 1945. Corruption has affected not only politicians but also those at lower levels of society and has engulfed society as a whole. Thus, in order to consolidate democracy, it will not be enough in the future to replace politicians and reform institutions, but the society as a whole must change too, especially in its way of thinking and behavior.
References
- BODÓ Barna (2018): A demokrácia kapujában. In: Rendszerváltó Archívum 2018/2. Budapest, pp. 37-42.
- BÖCKENFÖRDE, Ernst-Wolfgang (1982): A közvetett/képviseleti demokrácia mint a demokrácia tényleges formája. In: TAKÁCS Péter (szerk) (2003): Államtan. Írások a XX. századi általános államtudomány köréből. Budapest, pp. 497-525.
- CSIZMADIA Ervin (2018): A magyar rendszerváltások és az ellenzék tanulóképessége. https://24.hu/poszt-itt/2018/08/20/csizmadia-ervin-a-magyar-rendszervaltasok-es-az-ellenzektanulokepessege/ 2019. 08. 27.
- CSÖNGE Attila (2011): „A földért harcolni kell!” Adalékok a második világháborút követő földosztás történetéhez. In: Zounuk 26. Szolnok, pp. 407-439.
- CSÖNGE Attila (2018): Ki volt Szolnok városrendezési tervének atyja? In: Tisicum XXVI. Szolnok, pp. 351-367.
- GRADVOHL, Paul – MARIÁN Béla – SZABÓ Ildikó (1998): A folyamatosság forradalma, avagy a Kádár-korszakhoz való viszony szerepe a magyar politikai közgondolkodásban. In: Politikatudományi Szemle. Budapest, 2. szám: pp. 5-26.
- GYARMATI György (2000): A társadalom közérzete a fordulat évében. In: FEITL István – IZSÁK Lajos – SZÉKELY Gábor (szerk) (2000): Fordulat a világban és Magyarországon 1947- 1949. Budapest, pp. 118-137.
- HORVÁTH Sándor (2000): A magyar társadalom életformája a fordulat éveiben 1945-1949. In: FEITL István – IZSÁK Lajos – SZÉKELY Gábor (2000): Fordulat a világban és Magyarországon 1947-1949. Budapest, pp. 347-367.
- MISZLEVITZ Ferenc (1999): A civil társadalom nyomvonalai az új európai térben. In: CSEFKÓ Ferenc – HORVÁTH Csaba (szerk) (2018): Magyar és európai civil társadalom. Pécs, pp. 178- 193.
- PATAKI Ferenc (2005): A Nékosz-legenda. Budapest.
