Assessment of backfat thickness and its relationship with reproductive performance of sows – preliminary findings
Authors
View
Keywords
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How To Cite
Abstract
Backfat thickness (BFT) is an important trait that influences reproductive performance in sows. This study investigated the relationship between sow BFT at farrowing and the number of live born (LB), stillborn (SB), and Mummies (Ms) in different parities (P) (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8). Backfat thickness was measured at point P2 (BFT at the last rib, at the junction of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae 3–5 cm from the midline of the spine (mm). In total, 216 sows were measured on day 109 of gestation (when they entered farrowing). Descriptive statistics showed that the mean BFT was 14.55 mm SEM 0.171 SD 2.576. Parity had a significant effect on BFT, with a Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared value of 22.728 (df = 7, p = 0.002). Post-hoc pairwise comparisons using Dunn's test in R revealed that P1 exhibited a significantly higher BFT than P3 (p = 0.001) and P4 (p = 0.025). Spearman’s correlation coefficient indicated a very weak negative relationship between BFT and LB, whereas there was a strong relationship between BFT and SB and Ms. However, the correlations were not significant p>0.05. This finding suggests that assessing the BFT before farrowing is a helpful tool for guiding sow management and pig production. Additionally, these findings offer data that can be used to inform culling policies.
References
- Amdi, C.; Giblin, L.; Hennessy, A.A.; Ryan, T.; Stanton, C.; Stickland, N.; Lawlor, P.G. (2013): Feed allowance and maternal backfat levels during gestation influence maternal cortisol levels, milk fat composition and offspring growth. J. Nutrit. Sci, 2, 1–10., doi:10.1017/jns.2012.20
- Authement, M.R.; Knauer, M.T. (2023): Associations between Sow Body Lesions with Body Condition and Subsequent Reproductive Performance. Open J. Vet. Med, 13, 111–121. doi: 10.4236/ojvm.2023.137010
- Barquero, V.; Roldan, E.R.; Soler, C.; Yániz, J.L.; Camacho, M.; Valverde, A. (2021): Predictive capacity of boar sperm morphometry and morphometric sub-populations on reproductive success after artificial insemination. Animals, 11 , p. 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11040920
- Bondoc, O.; Isubol, J. (2020): Changes in sow backfat thickness before and after farrowing in a local swine nucleus breeding farm. Philipp J. Vet. Anim. Sci, 46(1), 1–11.
- Buthelezi, N.L.; Mtileni, B.; Nephawe, K.A.; Modiba, M.C.; Mpedi, H.; Idowu, P.A.; Mpofu, T.J. (2024): Effects of parity, season of birth, and sex on within-litter variation and pre-weaning performance of F1 Large White x Landrace pigs. Vet. World, 17, doi: www.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2024.1459-1468.
- Charette, R.; Bigras-Poulin, M.; Martineau, G.P. (1996): Body condition evaluation in sows. Livest. Prod. Sci, 46, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(96)00022-X
- Chinn, S.M.; Schlichting, P.E.; Smyser, T.J.; Bowden, C.F.; Beasley, J.C. (2022): Factors influencing pregnancy, litter size, and reproductive parameters of invasive wild pigs. The J. Wild. Manag. 86, https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22304, e22304.
- Cole, D.J.A. (2020): Nutritional strategies to optimize reproductionin pigs. Bioscientifica Proceedings, 67–82.
- Davoli, R.; Catillo, G.; Serra, A.; Zappaterra, M.; Zambonelli, P.; Zilio, D.M.; Steri, R.; Mele, M.; Buttazzoni, L.; Russo, V. (2019): Genetic parameters of backfat fatty acids and carcass traits in Large White pigs. Animal, 13, 924–932. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118002082
- Decaluwé, R.; Maes, D.; Declerck, I.; Cools, A.; Wuyts, B.; De Smet, S.; Janssens, G. (2013): Changes in back fat thickness during late gestation predict colostrum yield in sows. Animal, 7, 1999–2007. doi:10.1017/S1751731113001791
- Dizon, P.B.; Alcantara, A.A. (2017): Relationship of backfat thickness and body weight on sow health and reproductive performance. Philipp J Vet Anim Sci., 43:11–21.
- Kim, J.S.; Yang, X.; Pangeni, D.; Baidoo, S.K. (2015): Relationship between backfat thickness of sows during late gestation and reproductive efficiency at different parities. Acta Agric. Scand, Section A—Anim.Sci 65, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2015.1045932
- Knecht, D.; Środoń, S.; Duziński, K. (2015): The impact of season, parity and breed on selected reproductive performance parameters of sows, Arch. Anim. Breed, 58, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-58-49-2015
- Lawlor, P.G.; Lynch, P.B. (2007): A review of factors influencing litter size in Irish sows. Ir Vet J, 60, 359–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-60-6-359 PMid:21851695
- Leal, D.F.; Muro, B.B.; Nichi, M.; Almond, G.W.; Viana, C.H.; Vioti, G.; Garbossa, C.A. (2019): Effects of post-insemination energy content of feed on embryonic survival in pigs: a systematic review. Anim. Rep. Sci, 205, 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.04.005
- Li, X.; Kennedy, B.W.; (1994): Genetic parameters for growth rate and backfat in Canadian Yorkshire, Landrace, Duroc, and Hampshire pigs. J. Anim. Sci, 72, 1450–1454. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.7261450x
- Madeira Pacheco, V.; Brown-Brandl, T.M.; Rohrer, G.A.; Vieira de Sousa, R.; Silva Martello, L. (2024): Impacts of Farrowing Pen Design, Season, and Sow Parity on Litter Performance and Piglet Mortality. Animals, 14, p.325. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14020325,
- Maes, D.; Janssens, G.; Delputte, P.; Lammertyn, A.; de Kruif, A. (2004): Back fat measurements in sows from three commercial pig herds: relationship with reproductive efficiency and correlation with visual body condition scores. Livest Prod Sci, 91, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.06.015
- Mallmann, A.L.; Camilotti, E.; Fagundes, D.P.; Vier, C.E.; Mellagi, A.P.G.; Ulguim, R.R.; Bortolozzo, F.P. (2019): Impact of feed intake during late gestation on piglet birth weight and reproductive performance: a dose-response study performed in gilts. J. Anim. Sci, 97, 1262–1272. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz017,
- Muirhead, M.R.; Alexander, T.J.L. (1997): Managing Pig Health and the Treatment of Disease. A Reference for the Farm. 5M Entreprises, Sheffield, pp 133–226.
- Oliviero, C.; Heinonen, M.; Valros, A.; Peltoniemi, O. (2010): Environmental and sow-related factors affecting the duration of farrowing. Anim. Rep. Sci, 119, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.12.009
- Roongsitthichai, A.; Olanratmanee, E.O. (2021): Fetal mortality associated with backfat thickness at first mating and first farrowing of the primiparous sows raised in a commercial herd in Thailand. Trop. Anim. Health. Prod, 53, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02624-3
- Roongsitthichai, A.; Koonjaenak, S.; Tummaruk, P. (2010): Backfat thickness at first insemination affects litter size at birth of the first parity sows. Agric. Nat. Res, 44, 1128–1136.
- Theil, P.K.; Farmer, C.; Feyera, T. (2022): Physiology and nutrition of late gestating and transition sows. J. Anim. Sci, 100, p. skac176. , p.176. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skac176
- Thiengpimol, P.; Koonawootrittriron, S.; Suwanasopee, T. (2024): Assessing reproductive performance and predictive models for litter size in Landrace sows under tropical conditions. Anim. Biosci, 37, doi: 10.5713/ab.23.0406, p. 1333.
- Thiengpimol, P.; Koonawootrittriron, S.; Suwanasopee, T. (2022): Genetic and phenotypic correlations between backfat thickness and weight at 28 weeks of age, and reproductive performance in primiparous Landrace sows raised under tropical conditions. Trop. Anim. Health. Prod, 54, p.43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03047-4
- Thitachot, K.; Sirinopwong, V.; Seemuang, V.; Ratchatasriprasert, A.; Kirkwood, R.N.; Am-In, N. (2021): Influence of backfat thickness and the interval from altrenogest withdrawal to estrus on reproductive performance of gilts. Animals, 11, p. 1348. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051348
- Thongkhuy, S.; Chuaychu, S.B.; Burarnrak, P.; Ruangjoy, P.; Juthamanee, P.; Nuntapaitoon, M.; Tummaruk, P. (2020): Effect of backfat thickness during late gestation on farrowing duration, piglet birth weight, colostrum yield, milk yield and reproductive performance of sows. Livest. Sci, 234, p.103983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.103983
- Tian, L.; Wen, A.Y.; Dong, S.S.; Xiao, K.Y.; Li, H.; Yan, P.S. (2019): Excessive backfat of sows at mating promotes oxidative stress and up-regulates mitochondrial-mediated apoptotic pathway in the full-term placenta. Livest. Sci, 222, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.02.012
- Wood, J.D. (1984). Fat deposition and the quality of fat tissue in meat animals. Fats in Anim. Nutr, 41, 407–435.
- Wood, J.D.; Enser, M.; Fisher, A.V.; Nute, G.R.; Sheard, P.R.; Richardson, R.I.; Whittington, F.M. (2008): Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality: A review. Meat sci, 78,343–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.019
- Zhou, Y.; Xu, T.; Cai, A.; Wu, Y.; Wei, H.; Jiang, S.; Peng, J. (2018): Excessive backfat of sows at 109 d of gestation induces lipotoxic placental environment and is associated with declining reproductive performance. J. Anim. Sci, 96 ,250–257. doi: 10.1093/jas/skx041