Évf. 7 szám 1 (2022)

Menedzsmenttudományok

Long Container Dwell Time at Seaport Terminals: An Investigation Study from a Consignee Perspective

Megjelent:

2022-04-08

https://doi.org/10.21791/IJEMS.2022.1.9.

Szerzők

Ewamer Ammar Gamal Mohamed Khlil,

University of Debrecen, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Engineering Management and Enterprise

Menyhárt József

University of Debrecen, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Road -and Air Vehicles

Megtekintés

pdf (Angol)

Kulcsszavak

Container Shipping Industry Import Shipping Container Dwell Time Demurrage and Detention Charges

Licenc

Copyright (c) 2022 Ammar Gamal Mohamed Khlil Ewamer, József Menyhárt

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Hogyan hivatkozzuk

Kiválasztott formátum: APA

Ewamer, A. G. M. K., & Menyhárt, J. (2022). Long Container Dwell Time at Seaport Terminals: An Investigation Study from a Consignee Perspective. International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.21791/IJEMS.2022.1.9.

Hivatkozási formátumok

Hivatkozások
• ACM
• ACS
• APA
• ABNT
• Chicago
• Harvard
• IEEE
• MLA
• Turabian
• Vancouver
• AMA

---

Letölthető hivatkozások
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Beküldött 2021-07-08
Elfogadott 2021-12-08
Publikált 2022-04-08

Absztrakt

Many companies are concerned about the problem of increasing average dwell time for their import containers at the port of the final destination and therefore incurring additional shipping costs in form of demurrage charges for the port administration and detention charges for the shipping line. Previous studies have addressed this topic by analyzing terminal operations and evaluated its effects on port productivity and competitiveness; however few studies have explicitly explored long container dwell time causes from a consignee perspective. This research aims to identify the causes of long dwell time for the import containers at port storage yards for one of the leading FMCG companies in Jordan. To that end, the data of import containers whose stay at the terminal exceeded the free storage days in the period between 2019 and 2020 were collected by referring to the set of shipping documents and reviewing the correspondences between the consignee and other parties in the supply chain. Based on the timelines that have been analyzed for each case of delay to the collection of shipping documents in consideration with the payment terms, as well as the clearance and delivery timelines, ten causes for the long container dwell time have been identified and classified into three main categories according to the types of flow in the supply chain; five causes related to information flow, two causes related to cash flow, and three causes related to physical flow. The impact of these causes has been evaluated using the demurrage and detention charges as a measure indicator and the findings of this research have also revealed that the causes related to cash flow have a greater impact than the other types of causes.

Hivatkozások

1. N. Moini, M. Boile, S. Theofanis, and W. Laventhal, “Estimating the determinant factors of container dwell times at seaports,” Marit. Econ. Logist., 2012, doi: 10.1057/mel.2012.3.
2. “Aqaba Company for Ports Operation & Management.” http://www.aqabaports.com.jo/EN/INPage.aspx (accessed Mar. 17, 2021).
3. “Our Terminal - Aqaba Container Terminal.” https://www.act.com.jo/en/about-us/about-us (accessed Mar. 17, 2021).
4. “About Us - Aqaba Logistics Village (ALV).” http://www.alv.jo/AboutUs.aspx (accessed Mar. 17, 2021).
5. P. Hayaloglu, “The Impact of Developments in the Logistics Sector on Economic Growth: The Case of OECD Countries International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues The Impact of Developments in the Logistics Sector on Economic Growth: The Case of OECD Countries,” Int. J. Econ. Financ. Issues, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 523–530, 2015, Accessed: Jan. 28, 2021. [Online]. Available: http:www.econjournals.com.
6. J. Engblom, T. Solakivi, J. Töyli, L. O.-I. J. of Production, and undefined 2012, “Multiple-method analysis of logistics costs,” Elsevier, Accessed: Jan. 28, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527312000084?casa_token=xjSqMZVRFasAAAAA:PblZkIZSioxK2I0whmmyRTK4a6UA2SHSRu17QTmnKCfc40rU71J3I6BUbbkb45_zxVLk3Y9zfQ.
7. J. Mangan and C. Lalwani, Global logistics and supply chain management. 2016.
8. J. T. Mentzer et al., “DEFINING SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT,” J. Bus. Logist., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1–25, Sep. 2001, doi: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00001.x.
9. K. D. Chopra S, Meindl P, Supply chain management: strategy, planning, and operation., 4th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2013 Nov., 2013.
10. & L. J.-I. J. of P. D. and undefined 2004, “Supply chain logistics risks. From the back room to the board room,” elibrary.ru, Accessed: Jan. 29, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=6636591.
11. R. Omar and T. Ramayah, “Information exchange and supply chain performance,” Artic. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 35–52, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1142/S0219622010003658.
12. I. F. A. Vis and R. De Koster, “Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: An overview,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00293-X.
13. H. Dally, “Container Handling and Transport: A Manual of Current Practice,” 1983, Accessed: Jan. 28, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://trid.trb.org/view/393457.
14. Hoffman P., “Container facility planning: a case description,” Port Manag. Textb. Contain. Inst. Shipp. Econ. Logist., pp. 353–364, 1985, Accessed: Jan. 28, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Hoffman+P.+Container+facility+planning%3A+a+case+description.+Port+management+textbook+containerization%2C+Institute+of+shipping+economics+and+logistics.+1985%3A353-64.&btnG=.
15. F. Merckx, “The Issue of Dwell Time Charges to Optimize Container Terminal Capacity,” IAME 2005 Annu. Conf., 2005.
16. J. P. Rodrigue and T. Notteboom, “The terminalization of supply chains: Reassessing the role of terminals in port/hinterland logistical relationships,” Marit. Policy Manag., 2009, doi: 10.1080/03088830902861086.
17. Nathan Huynh, “Analysis of container dwell time on marine terminal throughput and rehandling productivity,” J. Int. Logist. Trade, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 69–89, 2008, Accessed: Jun. 13, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE01770925#.
18. S. Y. Huang, W. J. Hsu, C. Chen, R. Ye, and S. Nautiyal, “Capacity analysis of container terminals using simulation techniques,” Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 246–253, 2008, doi: 10.1504/IJCAT.2008.021379.
19. I. Kourounioti, A. Polydoropoulou, and C. Tsiklidis, “Development of Models Predicting Dwell Time of Import Containers in Port Container Terminals - An Artificial Neural Networks Application,” in Transportation Research Procedia, Jan. 2016, vol. 14, pp. 243–252, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.061.
20. S. Fazi and K. J. Roodbergen, “Effects of demurrage and detention regimes on dry-port-based inland container transport,” Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.01.012.
21. “Tariffs - Aqaba Container Terminal.” https://www.act.com.jo/en/practical-information/tariffs (accessed Apr. 14, 2021).
22. “LCL Tariff.” http://www.alv.jo/LCLTariff.aspx (accessed Apr. 14, 2021).
23. “WHO/Europe | Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak - About the virus.” https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov (accessed May 25, 2021).
24. C. H. Chang, J. Xu, and D. P. Song, “Risk analysis for container shipping: From a logistics perspective,” International Journal of Logistics Management. 2015, doi: 10.1108/IJLM-07-2012-0068.