dEjournals Nyitóoldal
International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences
Regisztráció Aktuális szám Megjelenés előtti cikkek Archívum Indexáltság Beküldés Kapcsolat Keresés
Regisztráció Bejelentkezés
IJEMS

Évf. 9 szám 2 (2024)
Környezettudományok

Municipal Geothermal Systems: Evaluation of Three Hungarian Cases

Megjelent:
2024-06-28
DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.21791/IJEMS.2024.018
Szerzők
Szolga Krisztián,
Árpád István W. ,
Kocsis Dénes
Megtekintés
PDF (Angol)
Kulcsszavak
Geothermal System Geothermal Energy Extraction Geothermal Well Engineering Challenges Case Study Scaling
Licenc

Copyright (c) 2024 Krisztián Szolga, István W. Árpád, Dénes Kocsis

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How To Cite
Kiválasztott formátum: APA
Szolga, K., Árpád, I. W. ., & Kocsis, D. (2024). Municipal Geothermal Systems: Evaluation of Three Hungarian Cases. International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences, 9(2), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.21791/IJEMS.2024.018
Absztrakt

Geothermal energy holds great potential for a sustainable future, as it is a clean and weather-independent form of energy. In addition to energy production, it can also serve the population of a region through direct use. In this paper, three municipal geothermal systems (Szarvas, Nagyszénás, Békéscsaba) in the same Hungarian region which have been recently installed or expanded are presented and analysed. Here, the direct usage of geothermal energy for heating purposes is a very important issue. The three systems show several differences and to some extent face different challenges in the various phases of the projects. Particular attention has been paid to engineering solutions to the problems that arise. The challenges, such as technical difficulties during installation, maintenance difficulties, or problems arising during operation are introduced. The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of similar geothermal systems were summarized, based on the relevant literature. These points were evaluated by their appearance and characteristics in the examined systems. This study aims to provide insights, based on recently gained experiences, into geothermal projects, thus providing feedback and practical information for researchers and practitioners.

Hivatkozások
  1. G. Axelsson, “Sustainable geothermal energy utilization,” Int. Rev. Appl. Sci. Eng. IRASE, vol. 1, no. 1–2, pp. 21–30, 2010, doi: 10.1556/irase.1.2010.1-2.4.
  2. M. Soltani et al., “A comprehensive review of geothermal energy evolution and development,” Int. J. Green Energy, vol. 16, no. 13, pp. 971–1009, 2019, doi: 10.1080/15435075.2019.1650047.
  3. N. Arbad, H. Emadi, and M. Watson, “A comprehensive review of geothermal cementing from well integrity perspective,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., vol. 217, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110869.
  4. D. Borzuei, S. F. Moosavian, A. Ahmadi, R. Ahmadi, and K. Bagherzadeh, “An Experimental and Analytical Study of Influential Parameters of Parabolic trough Solar Collector,” J. Renew. Energy Environ., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 52–66, 2021, doi: 10.30501/jree.2021.261647.1172.
  5. IEA, “Renewables 2023 Analysis and forecast to 2028,” 2024. [Online]. Available: www.iea.org.
  6. IEA, “World Energy Outlook 2023,” 2023. [Online]. Available: www,iea.org.
  7. S. J. Zarrouk and H. Moon, “Efficiency of geothermal power plants: A worldwide review,” Geothermics, vol. 51, pp. 142–153, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.GEOTHERMICS.2013.11.001.
  8. V. K. Singh and S. K. Singal, “Operation of hydro power plants-a review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 69, pp. 610–619, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.RSER.2016.11.169.
  9. F. Dincer, “The analysis on wind energy electricity generation status, potential and policies in the world,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 5135–5142, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1016/J.RSER.2011.07.042.
  10. J. Khan and M. H. Arsalan, “Solar power technologies for sustainable electricity generation – A review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 55, pp. 414–425, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.RSER.2015.10.135.
  11. A. Q. Al-Shetwi, “Sustainable development of renewable energy integrated power sector: Trends, environmental impacts, and recent challenges,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 822, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153645.
  12. A. Wachowicz-Pyzik, A. Sowiżdżał, and L. Pająk, “Environmental benefits from geothermal energy use with a well doublet located in the Szczecin Trough (NW Poland),” Environ. Geochem. Health, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 2325–2339, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10653-022-01220-0.
  13. N. Azizi et al., “Critical review of multigeneration system powered by geothermal energy resource from the energy, exergy, and economic point of views,” Energy Sci. Eng., vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 4859–4889, 2022, doi: 10.1002/ese3.1296.
  14. D. Romanov and B. Leiss, “Geothermal energy at different depths for district heating and cooling of existing and future building stock,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 167, p. 112727, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.RSER.2022.112727.
  15. C. Kinney, A. Dehghani-Sanij, S. B. Mahbaz, M. B. Dusseault, J. S. Nathwani, and R. A. Fraser, “Geothermal energy for sustainable food production in Canada’s remote northern communities,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 21, 2019, doi: 10.3390/en12214058.
  16. M. Soltani et al., “A comprehensive study of geothermal heating and cooling systems,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 44, pp. 793–818, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.09.036.
  17. J. W. Lund, G. W. Huttrer, and A. N. Toth, “Characteristics and trends in geothermal development and use, 1995 to 2020,” Geothermics, vol. 105, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102522.
  18. T. Schott and F. Liautaud, “Monitoring and mitigating corrosion in geothermal systems,” Mater. Corros., vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 1916–1942, 2022, doi: 10.1002/maco.202213359.
  19. K. A. Lichti, S. Ghaziof, R. Julian, and B. W. Mountain, “Geochemical modelling of heavy metal deposition in a geothermal heat exchanger,” Geothermics, vol. 118, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2023.102884.
  20. L. Zacherl and T. Baumann, “Quantification of the effect of gas–water–equilibria on carbonate precipitation,” Geotherm. Energy, vol. 11, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40517-023-00256-4.
  21. F. Fanicchia and S. N. Karlsdottir, “Research and Development on Coatings and Paints for Geothermal Environments: A Review,” Adv. Mater. Technol., vol. 8, no. 18, 2023, doi: 10.1002/admt.202202031.
  22. S. N. Karlsdóttir, Corrosion, scaling and material selection in geothermal power production, vol. 7. 2012.
  23. Y. Li et al., “An efficient silica scale inhibiting strategy for geothermal systems: Combination of cationic and anionic polymers,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 140, no. 32, 2023, doi: 10.1002/app.54245.
  24. J. Yan, X. Tan, and S. Qi, “High-Temperature-Resistant Scale Inhibitor Polyaspartic Acid-Prolineamide for Inhibiting CaCO3 Scale in Geothermal Water and Speculation of Scale Inhibition Mechanism,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 8, 2023, doi: 10.3390/w15081457.
  25. S. Qiao et al., “A novel and efficient CaCO3 scale inhibitor in high-temperature and high-salinity geothermal systems: A deprotonated quadripolymer,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 140, no. 10, 2023, doi: 10.1002/app.53581.
  26. L. Lenkey, J. Mihályka, and P. Paróczi, “Review of geothermal conditions of Hungary | Magyarország geotermikus viszonyainak áttekintése,” Foldt. Kozlony, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 65–78, 2021, doi: 10.23928/foldt.kozl.2021.151.1.65.
  27. B. Kulcsár, “Combined energy production in the North Great Plain Region,” Int. Rev. Appl. Sci. Eng. IRASE, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 63–67, 2011, doi: 10.1556/irase.2.2011.1.10.
  28. A. Nádor, A. Kujbus, and A. Toth, Geothermal Energy Use, Country Update for Hungary. 2016.
  29. A. Toth, Country Update for Hungary. 2020.
  30. J. Szanyi and B. Kovács, “Utilization of geothermal systems in South-East Hungary,” Geothermics, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 357–364, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1016/J.GEOTHERMICS.2010.09.004.
  31. D. Romanov and B. Leiss, “Geothermal energy at different depths for district heating and cooling of existing and future building stock,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 167, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112727.
  32. G. Herrera-Franco et al., “Bibliometric Analysis and Review of Low and Medium Enthalpy Geothermal Energy: Environmental, Economic, and Strategic Insights,” Int. J. Energy Prod. Manag., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 187–199, 2023, doi: 10.18280/ijepm.080307.
  33. A. Ramos-Escudero and M. S. García-Cascales, “Barriers behind the Retarded Shallow Geothermal Deployment in Specific Areas: A Comparative Case Study between Southern Spain and Germany,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 13, 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15134596.
  34. S. Widi Hastuti, A. N. M. Anugrah, K. Nafista, and A. Kahfi Ilham, SWOT Analysis for Geothermal Enhanced System (EGS) As New Technology for Development Geothermal in Indonesia. 2021.
  35. K. Szolga and D. Kocsis, “Modern use of geothermal energy in Nagyszénás (Case Study),” Int. J. Eng. Manag. Sci., vol. 7, no. 3 SE-Environmental Engineering, pp. 106–115, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.21791/IJEMS.2022.3.10.
  36. Q. Khan, M. A. Maraqa, and A. M. O. Mohamed, “Inland desalination,” Pollut. Assess. Sustain. Pract. Appl. Sci. Eng., pp. 871–918, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-809582-9.00017-7.
Adatbázis logók
DOAJ MTMT SHERPA EIRHPLUS EBSCO CROSSREF