Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering

Effects of Surface Grinding Parameters on the Apparent Elastic Modulus of AA7075 Thin Plate

Published:
2026-06-01
Authors
View
Keywords
License

Copyright (c) 2026 Michael Kwabena Boadu, Anthony Agyei-Agyemang, Faisal Adam

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Boadu, M. K., Agyei-Agyemang, A., & Adam, F. . (2026). Effects of Surface Grinding Parameters on the Apparent Elastic Modulus of AA7075 Thin Plate. International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.21791/IJEMS.2026.09
Received 2026-01-02
Accepted 2026-06-01
Published 2026-06-01
Abstract

Aluminum 7075 (AA7075) thin plates are used extensively in the marine industry, especially for the manufacture of skin panels for hydrofoils. Although surface grinding is a finishing process for AA7075 thin plates, the extent of the influence of grinding parameters on the apparent elastic modulus is not well understood.  This study statistically evaluates the influence of surface grinding parameters on the apparent elastic modulus of AA7075 thin plates. Samples of AA7075 thin plates were ground with respect to an experimental design, and their apparent elastic modulus was measured from the DI-CP/V2 Servo-hydraulic testing machine. It was found that the feed has the highest standardized effect (7.0) on the apparent elastic modulus (9.84–32.81 GPa), followed by table speed (5.8) and grinding depth (5.5). The two-way interactions were significant except for the table speed-grinding depth interaction.  The regression model shows a close match to the experimental data as indicated by the low standard error (S = 2.14), large coefficient of determination (R2 = 82.51%), and high adjusted coefficient of determination (R2 adj = 73.52%), which means that the chosen factors and interactions can be used to explain the large percentage of the variability of the apparent elastic modulus. The optimal grinding parameters were found at high table speed (50 spm), high feed (5 mm), and high grinding depth (1 mm). 

References
  1. [1] J. Joel and M. Anthony Xavior, “Aluminium Alloy Composites and its Machinability studies; A Review,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 13556–13562, 2018, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.351
  2. [2] Z. B. Hou and R. Komanduri, “On the mechanics of the grinding process – Part I. Stochastic nature of the grinding process,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 43, no. 15, pp. 1579–1593, Dec. 2003, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0890-6955(03)00186-x
  3. [3] K. Singh, A. Kumar, V. Sharma, and P. Kala, “Sustainable techniques in grinding: State of the art review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 269, p. 121876, Oct. 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121876
  4. [4] Instron, “Modulus of Elasticity,” Instron, Apr. 18, 2024. https://www.instron.com/en/resources/glossary/modulus-of-elasticity/
  5. [5] S. Hill, “A Guide to Young’s Modulus and Material Stiffness,” BES Group, Mar. 26, 2025. https://besgroup.com/blogs/a-guide-to-youngs-modulus-and-material-stiffness/
  6. [6] M. Boadu, A. Agyei-Agyemang, P. Andoh, and F. Adam, “Assessment of Mechanical Behaviour Trends of Surface-Ground AA7075 Thin Plate Across Run Orders,” Advances in Mechanical and Materials Engineering, vol. 43, pp. 29–42, Jan. 2026, DOI: https://doi.org/10.7862/rm.2026.3
  7. [7] D. Hou, S. Gao, J. Liu, and S. Huang, “Effect of Grinding Parameters on the Hardness Penetration Depth of the Steel GCr15 in Internal Grind Hardening Process,” Journal of Physics Conference Series, vol. 1637, no. 1, pp. 012112–012112, Sep. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1637/1/012112
  8. [8] S. Guo, S. Lu, B. Zhang, and C. F. Cheung, “Surface integrity and material removal mechanisms in high-speed grinding of Al/SiCp metal matrix composites,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 178, p. 103906, Jul. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2022.103906
  9. [9] M. Beghini, L. Bertini, B. D. Monelli, C. Santus, and M. Bandini, “Experimental parameter sensitivity analysis of residual stresses induced by deep rolling on 7075-T6 aluminium alloy,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 254, pp. 175–186, Sep. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.06.008
  10. [10] El Ouafi and N. Barka, “Un modèle intégré pour la prédiction de l’état de surface en fraisage pour alliages d’aluminium,” Revue de Métallurgie, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 357–368, 2011, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/metal/2011070
  11. [11] E. M. Anderson, J. R. Niska, and E. E. Niska, “Factorial design,” Academic Press, 2023, pp. 327– 330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-88423-5.00110-2
  12. [12] B209, ’’Standard Specification for Aluminum and Aluminum-Alloy Sheet and Plate’’, American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Dr., West Conshohocken, PA 19428, 2014.
  13. [13] N. M. Vaxevanidis, N. A. Fountas, C. Koraidis, A. Koutsomichalis, & P. Psyllaki, ‘‘Modeling of surface finish in turning of a brass alloy based upon statistical multi-parameter analysis’’, Tribological Journal BULTRIB, vol. 5, pp. 303-313, 2015.
  14. [14] BS 1SO 6892-1:2019, “Metallic Materials – Tensile Testing. Part 1: Method of Test at Room Temperature’’, British Standards Institution (BSI) Limited, 2020.
  15. [15] L. M. Robert, F. G. Richard, and L. H. James, Statistical and Analysis of Experiments. New York: John Wiley and Sons Publication, 2003.