dEjournals Home Page
International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences
Register Current issue Forthcoming Archives Indexing & Abstracting Submission Contact Search
Register Login
IJEMS

Online first
Management Sciences

Factors Influencing Project Owner Satisfaction with Supervision Consultants in Public Building Projects

Published:
2025-12-12
DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.21791/IJEMS.2025.21
Authors
Hafizah Aulia,
Prasetia Irfan,
Hapsari Kartadipura Retna
View
PDF
Keywords
Supervision Consultant Improvement Strategy Building Construction Project Customer Sanitation Index Importance Performance Analysis
License

Copyright (c) 2025 Hafizah Aulia, Prasetia Irfan, Hapsari Kartadipura Retna

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Aulia, H., Irfan, P., & Retna, H. K. (2025). Factors Influencing Project Owner Satisfaction with Supervision Consultants in Public Building Projects. International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.21791/IJEMS.2025.21
Received 2025-09-26
Accepted 2025-12-10
Published 2025-12-12
Abstract

The construction supervision consultant is an appointed party responsible for overseeing the implementation of construction projects from start to finish. The satisfaction level of project owners with the consultant’s performance is a key indicator of project success. This study aims to determine the level of satisfaction and key factors influencing it in public building projects. A quantitative method was employed by distributing questionnaires to respondents from the Public Works Office, particularly within the Cipta Karya Division in Tapin Regency, which serves as the case study location. Data were analyzed using the Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) and Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) methods. The results showed that overall, the consultant’s performance was rated as very satisfactory, with the highest CSI score on the communication indicator (86.64%) and the ability to ensure and improve work quality (85.33%). The lowest CSI score was found in the documentation/administration indicator (80.11%). Although the CSI score indicates a high level of satisfaction, there is still room for improvement, particularly in administrative aspects and understanding of technical regulations. The IPA analysis also shows that several indicators fall under top priority, such as documentation/administration, supervision, internal human resources, communication, and the ability to ensure and enhance work quality. The improvement strategies proposed include training, high discipline, and effective communication.

References
  1. [1] S. Riany, “Analisa Kinerja Konsultan Pengawas Pada Bidang Sumber Daya Air Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Dan Penataan Ruang Kabupaten Tapin,” 2021.
  2. [2] W. Ervianto, Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi, 2023.
  3. [3] A. Husen, Manajemen Proyek. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
  4. [4] I. K. A. A. Putra, J. Pagehgiri, and I. P. G. Ariyanta, “Analisis Kinerja Konsultan Pengawas Konstruksi Dalam Pelaksanaan Proyek Gedung Puskesmas Di Kabupaten Tabanan,” Teknik Gradien, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 48–60, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.47329/teknikgradien.v13i1.741.
  5. [5] R. Apriani, “Analisis Kepuasan Pemilik Proyek Terhadap Kinerja Konsultan Pengawas Pada Proyek Konstruksi Jalan Di Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Dan Penataan Ruang Kota Banjarbaru,” Manajemen Konstruksi Program Studi Magister Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Lambung Mangkurat., 2022.
  6. [6] D. Abas, E. R. Ahadian, and M. Taufiq, “Analisis Kepuasan Pengguna Jasa Terhadap Kinerja Konsultan Pengawas Pada Pekerjaan Konstruksi Di Kota Ternate,” Journal of Science and Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 120–129, 2021.
  7. [7] H. Kerzner, Panduan Aplikasi Proyek Konstruksi. Jakarta: Yudhistira, 2006.
  8. [8] A. Noor, “Analisis Kepuasan BBPJN XI Banjarmasin Terhadap Kinerja Konsultan Pengawas Pada Pekerjaan Proyek Konstruksi Jembatan di Kalimantan Selatan,” 2020.
  9. [9] Z. Citra, B. Susetyo, and P. Wibowo, “Optimasi Kinerja Proyek Dengan Penerapan Metode Crashing Dan Linear Programming Pada Proyek Bulk Godown,” Rekayasa Sipil, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 106–113, 2018.
  10. [10] Achmad Fauzi, Shifa Ashila Salwa, Aniar Safitri, Eka Amelia Chiesa Julianti, and Sindy Nur Fazriyah, “Analisis Pengaruh Penggunaan Sistem Pembayaran Digital Dan Digital Marketing Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian,” JEKMA, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 11–17, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.56127/jekma.v2i1.409.
  11. [11] H. Dimyati and K. Nurjaman, Manajemen Proyek. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2016.
  12. [12] Kementrian PUPR, “Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 2005 Tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2002 Tentang Bangunan.” Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum Republik Indonesia, 2005.
  13. [13] Kementrian PUPR, “Peraturan Pemerintah Pekerjaan Umum No. 29/PRT/M/2006 Tentang Pedoman Persyaratan Teknik Bangunan Gedung.” Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum Republik Indonesia, 2006.
  14. [14] Peraturan Presiden, “Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perubahan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 Tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah.” 2021.
  15. [15] Kementrian PUPR, “Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum No: 08/PRT/M/2011 08/PRT/M/2011 Tentang Pembagian Subklasifikasi Dan Subkualifikasi Usaha Jasa Konstruksi.” Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum Republik Indonesia, 2011.
  16. [16] A. Shone and B. Parry, Successful Event Management: A Practical Handbook, Fifth. London: Cengage Learning, 2019.
  17. [17] I. Soeharto, Manajemen Proyek: Dari Konseptual Sampai Operasional. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2001.
  18. [18] A. Dwiretnani, W. Dony, and F. A. Manalu, “Analisis Kinerja Konsultan Pengawas Dalam Pelaksanaan Proyek Konstruksi,” Cvronlit, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 1, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.33087/civronlit.v9i1.112.
  19. [19] Kadri, Trihono, and V. A. Wardhana, “Faktor Dominan Kompetensi Teknis Konsultan Pengawas Pada Kinerja Waktu (Studi Kasus Proyek-Proyek Konstruksi di Provinsi Banten),” Jurnal Sipil, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 128–145, 2014.
  20. [20] Blumberg, Boris, D. Cooper, and P. Schindler, Business Research Methods. New York: McGraw Hill, 2014.
  21. [21] V. Devani and R. A. Rizko, “Analisis Kepuasan Pelanggandengan Menggunakan Metode Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) Dan Potential Gain in Customer Value (PGCV),” Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa Dan Manajemen Sistem Informasi, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 24–29, 2016.
  22. [22] P. Kotler, Manajemen Pemasaran. Jakarta: Prenhallindo, 2023.
  23. [23] D. Tjiptono, Pasar Modal Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Salemba, 2012.
  24. [24] J. F. Engel, R. D. Blackwell, and P. W. Miniard, Consumer Behavior. Fort Worth: Dryden Press, 1995.
  25. [25] Y. Soelasih, Analisis Kepuasan Konsumen terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Hotel X di Jakarta, vol. 4. Yogyakarta: Telaah Bisnis, 2004.
  26. [26] E. G. P. Taunay, “Analisis Kepuasan Konsumen Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Jasa Kesehatan,” Dinamika Sains, vol. 8, no. 16, 2010.
  27. [27] B. I. Ansari, Komunikasi Matematika Konsep Dan Aplikasi. Banda Aceh: Yayasan Pena, 2009.
  28. [28] B. Cushway, Kinerja Dalam Organisasi Sosial. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2015.
  29. [29] A. Haswartalmi and K. Wijaya, “Analisis Kinerja Konsultan Perencana Dan Konsultan Pengawas Terhadap Proyek Pemerintah Kabupaten Gayo Lues,” 2023, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jip
  30. [30] A. Wulandari and V. H. Puspasari, “Analisis Kinerja Konsultan Pengawas Konstruksi dalam Pelaksanaan Proyek di Kota Palangka Raya,” Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 16, no. 2, 2024.
  31. [31] M. Taqiudin, D. Anggara, and N. Nukman, “Analisis Pengawasan Konstruksi: Kajian Kinerja Konsultan Pengawas di Proyek Gedung RSUD Awet Muda Narmada,” TELSINAS, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 189–195, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.38043/telsinas.v6i2.4584.
  32. [32] PUPR Tapin, “Visi dan Misi PUPR Kabupaten Tapin.” Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang Kabupaten Tapin, 2019. Accessed: Aug. 28, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://dinaspupr.kalselprov.go.id/page/wu/visi-dan-misi/247
  33. [33] PUPR Tapin, “Tugas dan Fungsi Bidang Cipta Karya.” Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan, 2019. Accessed: Aug. 28, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://dinaspupr.kalselprov.go.id/page/wu/tugas-dan-fungsi/249
  34. [34] R. Rauf, “Evaluasi Kinerja Konsultan Pengawas Pada Proyek Rekonstruksi Jalan Di Provinsi Kalimantan Timur,” Diss. Institut Teknologi Nasional Malang, 2023.
  35. [35] S. Azwar, Validitas Dan Reliabilitas, Fourth. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2015.
  36. [36] F. O. Yoneda, G. Nursetyo, and T. Yuono, “Pengukuran Kinerja Konsultan Pengawas Konstruksi Jalan Dengan Metode CSI,” vol. 28, no. 2, 2023.
Database Logos
DOAJ MTMT SHERPA EIRHPLUS EBSCO CROSSREF Ulrichsweb Dimensions AI Scilit BASE miar OpenAire Index Copernicus Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam