Keresés

Keresési eredmények

• IQ versus befolyásolás, avagy az intelligencia hányados és a befolyásolhatóság közötti összefüggések

  39-46

  Siket Zsuzsanna

  Megtekintések száma:

  267

  This is an essay about the connection of impressionability and intelligence quotient. The intelligence quotient of witness or accused has main role in the criminal procedure.

  So, what is the intelligence and the intelligence quotient? The intelligence is a mental power, that contains the quality of argumentation, contemplation, learning, problem solution and the abstract thinking. This mental power helps to understand the happenings in the world. The intelligence quotient of the witness or accused is very important, because the quality of perception is based on the intelligence quotient. The perception shows how they can remember the criminal situations. The intelligence quotient depedns on the the social and cultural enviornment, the inherited qualities, and the personal experiences.

  The important question is, which is the stronger, the intelligence or the impressionability. High intelligence quotient is a mean of the witness or accused to escape form impressionability. On the other hand, the authorities try to use the power of influence. So two powers meet in the criminal procedure, the intelligence and the influenceing, and usually the stronger is the winner.

  The intelligence quotient has main role in the part of the investigation and the trial. The warnings before the interrogation are written in the difficult language of law. So it would be a problem in the part of investigation, because the witness or accused does not understand these. Because of that they would say or tell something that they would not tell in normal circumstances. The low intelligence makes the accused confess their real or believed sin. The accused with higher intelligence quotient understands much better the warning, and they can use those possibilites the law premits them. Their combinative quality is higher, so they discover another solutions not just the confessing. The authorities shall pay attention to the intelligence quotient of the accused, because the extremly low intelligence quotient would be the sign of mental retardation. The mental retardation is a kind of pathological mental state. The accused who suffers in pathological mental state is not be punishable or his or her punishment may be reduced unlimited.

  The language of trials is also difficult and the other problem with it is publicity. The accused with low IQ feels shame because of their low IQ so they want to keep it secret. The accused becomes stressed in the trial so they lose their second chance to make things better, because they are not able to confess without impressions again. Low intelligence quotient usually cooperates with low ability of problem solution, so the accused with low intelligence can’t adapt themselves to the occassion of the trial. This circumstance would influence the judges, when they impose punishment, so the punishment would be stricter.

  The conclusion is that the accused with low intelligence quotient meets with some difficulties during the criminal procedure, so the consuels for the defence shall pay attention to them, and help their clients with comments of the legal texts. On the other hand, the authorities shall be out for the good knowledge of mankind.

• A bírói pervezetés és szubjektivitás – befolyásolás a tárgyalóteremben

  59-65

  Resán Dalma

  Megtekintések száma:

  288

  The image of the judicial proceeding and the impressions of the participants are defined by various facts. These are important things, because the prestigious environment and the skill-based human approach are key factors in the acceptance of the judgments. The article analyzes the possibilities of the judicial influence through examples: like the condition of the buildings, the appearance and behavior of the employees and the staff. The statements made by the accused during the investigations are also very important within these topics, because they can justify the charge and predict the process of the proceedings. The personality of judge has great importance in the lead of the proceedings – for example tone, questioning style, situation awareness and logic. These things above are definitely specify the way of the proceedings.

• A hamis beismerő vallomást eredményező befolyásolás a büntetőeljárásban

  Elek Balázs

  Megtekintések száma:

  293

  Often justice would be less miscarry, if all who were about to weigh evidence had more conscious of the treachery of human memory.

  The memory ideas of a person are objective reproductions of earlier experience or are mixed up with associations and suggestions. The possibility exists that police might obtain a confession from an innocent person in a crime he had never committed. It is even possible that false confession might lead to a false conviction.

  The power of suggestion devastates memory, and this remains entirely within the limits of the normal healthy individuality. If interviewing techniques were to be assessed in terms of the police claim that they are geared to an objective reach for the truth, then they would emerge as thoroughly deficient. The progress of psychological science can not be further ignored.

• Mediation's possible influence on legal research methodology: a window on non-doctrinal legal approaches?

  121-144

  Yousfi Mourad

  Megtekintések száma:

  243

  Doctrinalism's dominance in legal scholarship, particularly in the traditional civil law European countries, has become an accepted truth. Nevertheless, new methodologies for legal research started to emerge and take different approaches to how studying law should be. This is the situation with the multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary methodologies, which present external methods that are open to various disciplines. Thus, they contradict doctrinalism's internal logic which is based essentially on the ‘black-letter reasoning’. Mediation is a process of a mixed sociolegal nature that we believe might boost the interest in a multidisciplinary approach, especially under the current context of the increasing regulatory tendencies encouraging recourse to this process and the failure of traditional and more formal procedures such as litigation to provide litigants with cost and time-efficient solutions. Nonetheless, it is reasonable to mention that several hurdles exist, including resistance to mediation to make this contribution. This paper aims to provide an overview of this methodological debate and the potential influence of Mediation as an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanism in this context.