dEjournals Home Page
Régiókutatás Szemle
Current
Archives Fortcoming Articles Search
Register Login

Régiókutatás Szemle

Fortcoming Articles
Articles

Coordination opportunities for cooperation between environmentally aware companies in Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén county

Published:
2024-10-25
DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.30716/
Authors
Gabriella Metszősy,
Tamás Faludi
View
pdf (Hungarian)
Keywords
green supply chain supply chain coordination decision-making AHP
License

Copyright (c) 2024 Gabriella Metszősy, Tamás Faludi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Metszősy, G., & Faludi, T. (2024). Coordination opportunities for cooperation between environmentally aware companies in Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén county. Régiókutatás Szemle, 51-62. https://doi.org/10.30716/
Abstract

The 21st century has seen significant changes in supply chain management. Chains with an increased number of members are now considered more like networks in the literature. Cooperation between members, coordination and synchronisation of processes have become increasingly difficult. In addition, supply chains are increasingly expected to apply environmentally friendly systems, technologies and processes. The increasing levels of pollution and the decreasing levels of non-renewable resources are also indicative of the changes in business. The objectives of organisations, and therefore of supply chains and networks, include the use of environmentally friendly solutions, but this also complicates the operation of companies and thus has an impact on coordination between members. Therefore, we have focused on a coordination solution that can effectively support supply chain coordination based on literature. Contracts are potentially a good solution for member coordination, and therefore the focus of our study is on the potential of contracts as a means of coordination in a business sphere where environmental awareness is a high demand. Thus, our study aims to establish a group of experts who are decision makers in firms with high levels of environmental awareness. Based on their preferences and using the AHP method, we would like to develop a decision support model that would help to propose a contract that coordinates the partnership at the appropriate level, taking into account the characteristics, expectations and attitudes of environmentally aware companies.

References
  1. Abbasi, S., Choukolaei, H. A. (2023): A systematic review of green supply chain network design literature focusing on carbon policy. Decision Analytics Journal, 6., p. 100189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100189
  2. Arshinder, A., K., Deshmukh, S., G. (2008): Supply chain coordination: Perspectives, empirical studies and research directions. International Journal of Production Economics, 115(2), pp. 316-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.05.011
  3. Beamon, B. M. (1999): Designing the Green Supply Chain. Logistics Information Management, 12(4), pp. 332-342. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576059910284159
  4. Bouyssou, D. (1996): Outranking Relations: Do They Have Special Properties? Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 5(2), pp. 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1360(199606)5:2<99::aid-mcda97>3.0.co;2-8
  5. Cai, Y-J., Coi, T-S., Zhang, J. (2020): Platform Supported Supply Chain Operations in the Blockchain Era: Supply Contracting and Moral Hazards. Decisions Sciences, 52(4), pp. 866-892. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12475
  6. Chakraborty, T., Shauhan, S.S., Vidyarthi, N. (2015): Coordination and competition in a common retailer channel: Wholesale price versus revenue-sharing mechanisms. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, pp. 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.04.010
  7. Chen, F., Drezner, Z., Ryan, J. K., Simchi-Levi, D. (2000): Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information. Management Science, 46(3), pp. 436-443. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.3.436.12069
  8. Coltman, T., Bru, K., Perm-Ajchariyawong, N., Devinney, T. M., Benito, G.G.R. (2009): Supply Chain Contract Evolution. European Management Journal, 27(6), pp. 388-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.11.005
  9. Costantino, F., Di Gravio, G., Shaban, A., Tronci, M. (2013): Exploring the Bullwhip Effect and Inventory Stability in a Seasonal Supply Chain. International Journal of Engineering Business Management 5(3), p.23. https://doi.org/10.5772/56833
  10. Forman, E. H. (1993): Facts and fictions about the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 17(4/5), pp. 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(93)90172-u
  11. De Giovanni, P. (2021): Smart supply chains with vendor managed inventory, coordination, and environmental performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 292(2), pp. 515-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.049
  12. Gautam, P., Kishore, A., Khanna, A., Jaggi, C. K. (2019): Strategic defect management for a sustainable green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, pp. 226-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.005
  13. Haq, M., Moazzam, M., Khan A. S., Ahmed, W. (2023): The impact of reverse logistics process coordination on third party relationship quality: A moderated mediation model for multichannel retailers in the fashion industry. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, p. 103362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103362
  14. Huang, F. Y., He, J., Lei, Q. (2020): Coordination in a retailer-dominated supply chain with a risk-averse manufacturer under marketing dependency. International Transactions in Operational Research, 27(6), pp. 3056-3078. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12520
  15. Li, Z.-P., Wang, J.-J., Perera, S., Shi, J. (2022): Coordination of a supply chain with Nash bargaining fairness concerns. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 159, p. 102627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102627
  16. Pfeiffer, T., (2016): A comparison of simple two-part supply chain contracts. International Journal of Production Economics, 180., pp. 114-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.06.023
  17. Pratt, J. W., Raiffa, H. Schlaifer, R. (1976): Foundations of Decision Under Uncertainty: An Elementary Exposition. Readings in Material Economics, pp. 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-019605-3.50009-2
  18. Rhee, B. van der, Schmidt, G., Veen, J. A. A. van der, Venugopal, V. (2014): Revenue-sharing contracts across an extended supply chain. Business Horizons 57(4), pp. 473-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.03.008
  19. Sarkins, J. (2003): A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(4), pp. 397-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-6526(02)00062-8
  20. Saaty, T. L. (1977): A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), pp. 234-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
  21. Saaty, R. W. (1987): The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), pp. 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
  22. Sluis, S., De Giovanni, P. (2016): The selection of contracts in supply chains: An empirical analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 41(1)., pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2015.10.002
  23. Stamatiou, D. R., Kirytopoulos, K. A., Ponis, S. T., Gayialis, S., Tatsiopoulos, I. (2019): A process reference model for claims management in construction supply chains: the contractors’ perspective. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(5), pp. 382-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1452100
  24. Um, K. H., Kim, S. M. (2019): The effects of supply chain collaboration on performance and transaction cost advantage: the moderation and nonlinear effects of governance mechanisms. International Journal of Production Economics, 217, pp. 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.03.025
  25. Wang, X., Disney, S. M. (2016): The bullwhip effect: Progress, trends and directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(3), pp. 691-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.022
  26. Wen, X., Choi, T.-M., Chong, S.-H. (2019): Fashion retail supply chain management: A review of operational models. International Journal of Production Econimics 207, pp. 34-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.10.012
  27. Wu, D. (2013): Coordination of competing supply chains with news-vendor and buyback contract. International Journal of Production Economics 144(1), pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.11.032
  28. Yao, F., Parilina, E., Zaccour, G., Gao, H. (2022): Accounting for consumers’ environmental concern in supply chain contracts. European Journal of Operational Research, 301(3), pp. 987-1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.11.039
  29. Xue, J., Zhang, W., Rasool, Z., Zhou, J. (2022): A review of supply chain coordination management based on bibliometric data. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61(12), pp. 10837-10850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.04.013
  30. Zhou, Y., Zhang, Y., Wahab, M. I. M., Goh, M. (2023): Channel leadership and performance for a closed-loop supply chain considering competition. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 175, p. 103151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103151
  31. Zhou, Y. & Zhang, Y. & Wahab, M. I. M. & Goh, M. (2023): Channel leadership and performance for a closed-loop supply chain considering competition. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 175, doi: 103151
Database Logos
DOAJ ProQuest MTMT SHERPA EIRHPLUS EBSCO CROSSREF