Articles

The pressure of generational change on the successors in the family farms in Karcag

Published:
2023-05-23
Authors
View
Keywords
License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Kovács, Éva K., & Pető, K. (2023). The pressure of generational change on the successors in the family farms in Karcag. Régiókutatás Szemle, 6(2), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.30716/RSZ/21/2/7
Abstract

Family farms have an important role in agriculture. It is a form of farming where the family can keep the acquired competence and wealth of the farm for several generations.Therefore the issue of generational change is becoming more and more important nowadays. However, generational changing can face a number of obstacles. One of the major obstacles to farm transfer can be if the family farm does not have a successor, who could carry on the family traditions. In practice, the State and the European Union too try to encourage young farmers to continue agricultural activity, but this is not too popular. In our survey, we were looking for the answer to how much psychological pressure there is on successors to take over their family farm, and how much this pressure depends on the size of the farm and the generation of successors. We conducted the questionnaire survey with family farms in Karcag where the issue of succession is actual. The results of the study based on the responses of the farmers surveyed, show that the successors do not feel the pressure of taking over the farm, but are rather proud to be able to continue on their family traditions.

References
  1. Agrya (2017): Gazdaságátadás, nemzedékváltás. Piackutatási jelentés, https://agrostratega.hu/letoltesek/AGRYA_AgroStratega_Gazdasagatadas_nemzedekvaltas_kutatasi_ jelentes_2017.pdf. 2020.12.10
  2. Bogáth Á. (2016): Utódlástervezés családi vállalkozásoknál. in Csiszárik-Kocsir Á.: Vállalkozásfejlesztés a XXI. században: VI. tanulmánykötet, Budapest: Óbudai Egyetem, pp 21–28.
  3. Csákné Filep J. (2012): Family businesses–focusing on succession. http://phd.lib.unicorvinus.hu/660/2/Csakne_Filep_Judit_den.pdf. 2021.01.08.
  4. Chrisman J., Chua J., Litz R. (2004): Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Volumes 28, pp 335–354.
  5. Chrisman J. J., Chua J. H., Kellermanns F. W., Chang, E. P. C. (2007): Are family managers agents or steward? An exploratory study in privately held family firms. Journal of Business Research, Volumes 60, pp 1030–1038.
  6. Corbetta, G., Salvato, C. (2004): Self-serving or self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Volumes 28, pp 355–362.
  7. Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D., Donaldson L. (1997): Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, Volumes 22, pp 20–47.
  8. Fidy, J., Makara, G. (2005): Biostatisztika. Informed 2002 Kft., http://www.tankonyvtar.hu/hu/tartalom/tkt/biostatisztika-1/ch08s03.html. 2020.03.24.
  9. Huang T. (1999): Who shall follow? Factors affecting the adoption of succession plans in Taiwan. Long Range Planning, Volumes 32 (No. 6).
  10. Jensen, M., Meckling, W. (1976): Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Volumes 3, pp 305–360.
  11. Kása R., Radácsi L., Timár G., Zsigmond Sz. (2018): Családi vállalkozások mentorálása. Working Paper Series, BGE Budapest Lab, 5.szám.
  12. Kazmi A. (1999): What young entrepreneurs think and do: A study of second- generation business entrepreneurs. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 8. szám: (No. 1.) pp 67–77.
  13. Kovács É. K. (2020): Az idősebb korosztály szerepe a családi gazdaságok generációváltásában. Magyar Gerontológia, 12.szám: pp 38.
  14. Lansberg I. (1999): Succeeding generations: Realizing the dream of families in business. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1999.
  15. Leach P. (2007): Family Businesses the Essentials. Profile Books, London, 2007.
  16. Leard Statistics (2016): Kruskal-Wallis H Test using SPSS Statistics. https://statistics.laerd.com/spsstutorials/kruskal-wallis-h-test-using-spss-statistics.php. 2020.03.24.
  17. Malhotra, N., K. (2008): Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation. Pearson Custom Publishing, pp. 120.-322.
  18. Meier, O., Schier, G. (2016): The early succession stage of a family firm: Exploring the role of agency rationales and stewardship attitudes. Family Business Review, Volumes Volumes 29 (No. 3.), pp 256–277.
  19. Mosolygó Á., Csákné Filep K. J., Heidrich B. (2018): Do first swallows make a summer? - on the readiness and maturity of successors of family businesses in Hungary. Working paper series Issue, Volumes 6, (No. 1).
  20. Noszkay E. (2017): Tapasztalatok a családi vállalkozások átörökítésének dilemmái kapcsán. Vezetéstudomány-Budapest Management Review, Volumes 48 (No. 6-7.). Pages 64-72. DOI:10.14267/VEZTUD. 2017.06.08.
  21. Reisinger, A., Kovács, N. (2013): Családi vállalkozás folytatása vagy saját vállalkozás indítása? A befolyásoló tényezők feltérképezése. – Róbert P. (szerk.) „Gazdaság és morál: tiszta társadalom, tiszta gazdaság”. Kautz Gyula Emlékkonferencia 2012. június 15. Válogatott tanulmányok, Széchenyi István Egyetem, Győr, pp 253–263.
  22. Reisinger A. (2013): Családi vállalkozás folytatásának tervei a felsőoktatási hallgatók körében. Vezetéstudomány, XLIV. évf. 7–8. szám, pp. 41-50.
  23. Royer S., Simons R., Boyd B., Rafferty A. (2008): Promoting family: A contingecy model of family business succession. Family Business Review, 21, pp 15-30.
  24. Stavrou E. T. (1999): Succession in family businesses: Exploring the effect of demographic factors on offspring intentions to join and take over the business. Journal of Small Business Management, Volumes 37 (No. 3.), pp 43-61.
  25. Wiklund J., Nordqvist M., Hellerstedt K., Bird M. (2013): Internal Versus External Ownership Transition in Family Firms: An Embeddedness Perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, pp 37.
Database Logos