Articles

Institutional and consumer market aspects of regional tourism development along the Lower-Ipoly

Published:
March 20, 2023
Authors
View
Keywords
License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Kóródi, M., Mondok, A., & Sánta, Ádám K. (2023). Institutional and consumer market aspects of regional tourism development along the Lower-Ipoly. Régiókutatás Szemle, 7(1), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.30716/RSZ/22/1/1
Abstract

Depending on the macro-level management of tourism, whether a top-down or a bottom-up or integrated tourism development method is applied, the assessment of the organizational and consumer market is an integral part of the status quo analysis. Coordination the stakeholders of the organizational market could be the task of a TDM, however, the linear extent and network of settlements, the specific location, and the unfavourable demographic characteristics raise a number of problems. The study summarizes the results of a research to make foundation for a tourism development concept, outlining the similarities and differences between the two stakeholder groups regarding the tourism needs of the given area. It also covers the preferred types of tourism and the services that make up each tourism product (absolute value, ranking and the ratio to the average). The Lower-Ipoly region can occupy a special position in the tourism market in some aspects (water, bicycle and ecotourism) by combining special product and destination development, as well as experience management and perhaps visitor management elements. Although the limited resources of the organizational market confine the realization of consumer ideas, the success of development is influenced by the demarcation of boundaries, which is a qualitative rather than a quantitative issue and is related to segmentation and differentiated supply. The organizational functions of the destination management are performed by the leading organization of the project currently being implemented. Thus, due to the overlapping maintenance periods, if the projects are sufficiently coordinated, continuous tourism coordination will take place even in the absence of a TDM organization. The results of the consumer market research show that solving the problems arising from limited natural resources requires a significant change in market behaviour not only for tourism service providers, but also for tourists.

References
  1. Adeyinka-Ojo, S.F., Khoo-Lattimorea, C., Nair, V (2014): A framework for rural tourism destination management and marketing organisations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 144. pp. 151 – 163 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814042128 2022. 03. 22.
  2. Bhat, S., Gaur, S.S. (2012): Managing diverse stakeholders in context of destination marketing, Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554211211217352 2022. 03. 05.
  3. Béki, P., Gál, A. (2012): A Tisza-tó, mint a hazai vízi sportturizmus fellegvára. Kalokagathia, 50-51 (1), pp. 87-99. https://lib.tf.hu:443/liberty/OpacLogin?mode=BASIC&openDetail=true&corporation=HU_TF&action=search&queryTerm=uuid%3D%2215c8a903c0a80868655b4797002a2ae9%22&operator=OR&url=%2Fopac%2Fsearch.do 2022. 09. 14.
  4. Bornhorst, T., Ritchie, J.R.B., Sheehan, L. (2010): Determinants of tourism success for DMOs and destinations: an empirical examination of stakeholders’ perspectives. Tourism Management, 51 (5), pp. 572-589 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman. 2022. 03. 07.
  5. Czimmer, J. A. (2008): A piac fogalma, elemei, a piac mérőszámai, a piaci változások elemzése. Nemzeti Szakképzési és Felnőttképzési Intézet, Budapest. pp. 6-8 https://www.nive.hu/Downloads/Szakkepzesi_dokumentumok/Bemeneti_kompetenciak_meresi_ertekelesi_eszkozrendszerenek_kialakitasa/17_0062_tartalomelem_001_munkaanyag_100331.pdf 2022. 03. 21.
  6. Enright, M. J., Newton, J. (2004): Tourism destination competitiveness: a quantitative approach, Tourism Management, 25(6), pp. 777-788.
  7. Fehér, I., Medina V. (2015): A Börzsöny- Duna- Ipoly térség természeti erőforrásainak jellemzői, és az itt található értékekben rejlő lehetőségek Börzsöny-Duna-Ipoly Vidékfejlesztési Egyesület, pp. 10-11. http://borzsonyleader.hu/userfiles/document/207-18szm-feher-medina.pdf 2022.09.14.
  8. Horner, S., Swarbrooke, J. (2007): Consumer behaviour in tourism. Butterworth-Heinemann, Linacre House, Oxford, GB, p. 440
  9. Kiss M. (2016): Alapmarketing. III. fejezet, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, ISBN 978 963 05 9827 9. http://mersz.hu/dokumentum/dj152a__20/ 2022. 03. 21.
  10. Michalkó, G. (2016): Turizmológia. Elméleti alapok. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest. pp. 116. ISBN 978 963 05 9717 3 https://mersz.hu/dokumentum/dj59t__116 DOI:10.1556/9789630597173 2022. 09. 14.
  11. Rekettye, G ., Törőcsik, M., Hetesi, E. (szerk.) (2015): Bevezetés a marketingbe Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó, ISBN: 978 963 05 9759 3 https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/dj81bam_book1#dj81bam_book1 2022.02.24.
  12. Ritchie, J.R.B., Crouch, G.I. (2003): The competitive destination: a sustainable tourism perspective. CABI Publishing, Oxon, GB, p. 304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851996646.0000 2022. 03. 25.
  13. Ruzsinné Tilesch, J., G-Tóth, L. (2013): A kedvező ökológiai állapot és az integrált gazdaságfejlesztés megvalósításának lehetséges irányai az Ipoly völgyében In: A falutipológiától a marketingföldrajzig: tanulmányok Sikos T. Tamás tiszteletére. Szent István Egyetem Gazdaság- és Társadalomtudományi Kar Regionális Gazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Intézet, Gödöllő, pp. 149-168. ISBN 978-963-269-364-4 http://mek.oszk.hu/11900/11912/11912.pdf 2022.09.14.
  14. Samu, I. (2014): Az Ipoly menti típustáj társadalmi történéseinek, folyamatainak a gazdaságra gyakorolt hatása közvetlen a rendszerváltozás „elő napjaitól” napjainkig. In: Makrogazdasági döntések– hálózati szinergiák = MACROECONOMIC DECISIONS – NETWORK SYNERGIES. Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetem, Sopron, pp. 469-481. ISBN 978-963-334-203-9 http://publicatio.uni-sopron.hu/id/eprint/1449 2022.09.14.
  15. Sheehan, L.R., Ritchie, J.R.B. (2005): Destination stakeholders: exploring identity and salience. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(3), 711-734 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals. 2022. 03. 12.
  16. Volgger, M., Pechlaner, H. (2014): Requirements for destination management organisations in destination governance: understanding DMO success. Tourism Management, Vol. 41(2014), pp. 64-75 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.09.001 2022. 03. 22.
  17. Wang Y. (2008): Collaborative destination marketing: roles and strategies of convention and visitors bureaus. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 14 (3) (2008), pp. 191-209 https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766708090582 2022. 03. 18.
Database Logos