Articles

The awareness and recognition of the tourism brand "Heart of the Hungarian Great Plain" and its attractions

Published:
May 23, 2023
Authors
View
Keywords
License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How To Cite
Selected Style: APA
Kóródi, M., Mondok, A., & Szabó, A. (2023). The awareness and recognition of the tourism brand "Heart of the Hungarian Great Plain" and its attractions. Régiókutatás Szemle, 5(1), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.30716/RSZ/20/1/6
Abstract

The objective of developing a geographical area is, first and foremost, the effective operation, the provision of an appropriate place to live and the well-being of its inhabitants, through the creation of appropriate economic, cultural, technological and ecological conditions. According to Ritchie-Crouch (2003), a tourism destination is competitive, if it has the capability for increasing tourism revenues, attracting tourists continuously, providing visitors with memorable experiences that meet their expectations, and furthermore, for profit generation. At the same time, however, the well-being of the local population must be maintained or increased by the preservation of resources for the future generations (i.e. keeping principles of sustainable development). The dynamic growth in tourism demand is also leading to increased competition between destinations. Intense competition also poses a challenge for the tourism marketing organization in the target area in terms of image building, product development and communication. However, the successful development of tourism can only be achieved through a well-functioning, well-cooperating system. Cooperation is needed both at regional and tourism product level. Although the slogan of Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok County as a tourism brand, the "Heart of the Great Plain" meets all the requirements for mottos, the recognition by travellers must be validated with market survey. A large sample (n = 1037) survey was conducted among domestic tourists visiting the destination in summer 2019. 71.6% of the respondents identify the county well by the brand “Heart of the Great Plain”, and the proportion of bad answers was trifling. In addition to the recognition of the tourism brand, the research also covered the assessment of the county's various tourism attractions. Twenty-nine tourism attractions were evaluated by the respondents as to whether they were visited or known. Based on the survey results, the well-known supply elements are Lake Tisza, Abádszalók, Jászberény Zoo and Botanical Garden, Cserkeszőlő, the spa resort, Tiszavirág Festival and RepTár, Interactive Aviation Museum in Szolnok. Although the awareness of county tourism attractions is considered favourable, twelve attractions had not been visited by 10% of non-county respondents until the date of surveying, and at least one quarter of respondents in each attraction were negative for a possible future visit. The conclusions of the research point out that by exploiting and developing the existing attractions in the destination, tourism innovation is needed to provide complex experience packages to reach a wide range of tourist segments. This can lead to a significant increase in the number of visitors.

References
  1. Cooper, C. et al. (1998): Tourism: Principles and Practice, Addison Wesley Longman, Singapore, p. 840.
  2. Dávid, L. - Kóródi, M. - Puczkó, L. - Vasvári, M. (2010): A Tisza-tó imázsa és márkázottsága. Turizmus Bulletin 14(1-2), pp. 85-92.
  3. Enright, M. J. – Newton, J. (2004): Tourism destination competitiveness: a quantitative approach. Tourism Management, 25(6), pp. 777-788.
  4. Észak-Alföldi Regionális Fejlesztési Ügynökség Nonprofit Kft. (2013): Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok Megyei Területfejlesztési Program 2014-2020, Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok Megyei Közgyűlés, p. 179.
  5. Freedman, D. – Pisani, R. – Purves, R. (2005): Statisztika, Typotex Kiadó, Budapest, p. 812.
  6. Horner, S.– Swarbrooke, J. (2007): Consumer behaviour in tourism, Butterworth-Heinemann, Linacre House, Oxford, GB, p. 440.
  7. Kaspar, C. et al (1998): Tourismus Management. Turizmus-Marketing und Fremdenverkehrsplanung, Valter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin, Németország, p. 949.
  8. László, É. - Kóródi, M. (2005): A márkák vonzereje, a vonzerő márkái. In Dr. habil Józsa, L. - Dr. habil Varsányi, J. (szerk.): Marketingoktatás és kutatás a változó Európai Unióban. Széchenyi István Egyetem, Győr, pp. 397–402.
  9. Lenténé Puskás, A. et al (2019): A szabadidős sport keresleti és kínálati elemek vizsgálata az Északalföldi régió egészség-turizmusában. Különleges Bánásmód, 5(4), pp. 45‒54.
  10. Lőrincz, K. –Sulyok, J. (2017): Turizmusmarketing, Akadémiai Kiadó Kft., Budapest, p. 357.
  11. Magyar Turisztikai Ügynökség (2017): A magyar háztartások utazási jellemzői, 2016., MTÜ, p. 19.
  12. Magyar Turisztikai Ügynökség (2018): A magyar lakosság belföldi és külföldi utazásai 2017-ben a KSH keresletfelmérések adatai alapján, MTÜ, p. 6.
  13. Ritchie, J. R. Brent - Crouch, G. I. (2003): The competitive destination: a sustainable tourism perspective, CABI Publishing, Oxon, Nagy-Britannia, p. 304.
  14. Uysal, M. – Chen, J. S. – Williams, D. R. (2000): Increasing state market share through a regional positioning, Tourism Management, vol. 21, pp. 89-96.
  15. Wagner, W. E. (2013): Using IBM® SPSS® Statistics for Research Methods and Social Science Statistics, Sage Publications, Amerikai Egyesült Államok, p. 168.
Database Logos